Endoscopy 2007; 39(5): 394-400
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966430
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Endoscopic transgastric procedures in anesthetized pigs: technical challenges, complications, and survival

C.  Feretis1 , D.  Kalantzopoulos1 , P.  Koulouris1 , C.  Kolettas1 , F.  Archontovasilis1 , S.  Chandakas2 , H.  Patsea3 , A.  Pantazopoulou3 , M.  Sideris4 , A.  Papalois4 , K.  Simopoulos5 , E.  Leandros6
  • 1Department of Therapeutic Endoscopy, Iaso General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 2Department of Minimal Access Gynaecological Surgery, Iaso Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 3Department of Pathology, Iaso General Hospital, Athens, Greece
  • 4Experimental/Research Unit, ELPEN Pharma, Athens, Greece
  • 5Department of Surgery, Medical School, Democritus University of Thrace, Alexandroupolis, Greece
  • 6Department of Surgery, Medical School, University of Athens, Hippocration Hospital, Athens, Greece
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 19 November 2006

accepted after revision 8 March 2007

Publication Date:
22 May 2007 (online)

Preview

Background and study aims: An incisionless endoscopic peroral transgastric approach to the peritoneal cavity has shown promise in animals as a potentially less invasive form of surgery. We present our experience with various endoscopic peroral transgastric procedures, reporting on the technical aspects and challenges that arose. Materials and methods: The following procedures were performed in 10 anesthetized pigs using a double-channel endoscope: peritoneoscopy (10 pigs), liver biopsy (one pig), cholecystectomy (six pigs), fallopian tube excision (one pig), and hysterectomy (one pig). Results: All the procedures were accomplished successfully. There were six minor intraoperative complications. Complete gastric cleansing and elimination of all bacteria was found to be impossible to achieve in the porcine model. Overinflation was a common problem. The lack of adequate endoscope support was a major limitation. Safe closure of the gastrotomy incision was difficult using the available clipping devices. Six pigs made an uncomplicated recovery after a follow-up period of 4 - 6 weeks. Subsequent pathological examination revealed deep gastric ulceration in one animal and a gastric wall abscess in another. Conclusions: Peroral transgastric surgery is technically feasible and safe in a porcine model. Although all the procedures were performed successfully, the study highlights some technical difficulties and illustrates the need for major technical innovations and extensive animal studies in order to evaluate the merits of incisionless surgery.

References

C. FeretisMD, PhD 

Department of Therapeutic Endoscopy
Iaso General Hospital

Athens
Greece

Fax: +30-210-6502966

Email: chrisferetis@gmail.com