Double-balloon colonoscopy after failed conventional colonoscopy: a pilot series with a new instrument

Background and study aims: The endoscopes that were developed for double-balloon enteroscopy have been successfully used in cases of failed colonoscopy. This study was a pilot series in which a new colonoscope was tested that utilized this double-balloon principle.

Patients and methods: A total of 29 patients (5 men, 24 women; mean age 54 years) in whom conventional colonoscopy had failed were included in this study. Both the failed colonoscopy and the double-balloon colonoscopy procedures were performed under general anesthesia, the usual practice in France. A prototype instrument (working length 152 cm, diameter 9.4 mm) designed to incorporate the principles of double-balloon enteroscopy was used. The completeness of colonoscopy was assessed according to conventional criteria by the achievement of a stable position in the cecum. The indicatons for the procedure, the time to reach the cecum, the need for fluoroscopic control, and adverse events were recorded.

Results: The previous colonoscopy failed due adhesions (n = 16), or to long or fixed loops (n = 13). Complete colonoscopy using the balloon method was achieved in 28/29 patients, taking an average time of 18 ± 14 minutes; a long sigmoid loop limited the examination to the left flexure in one patient. Balloon colonoscopy using double-balloon methodology was used in 24 patients and the instrument was used without an overtube (i. e. using a single-balloon technique) in five patients. Fluoroscopy was used in 16 patients to monitor endoscope progression. No complications were reported.

Conclusions: Double-balloon colonoscopy enables full colonic examination in almost all patients with a previous incomplete colonoscopy. The overtube should be used in most cases. The use of fluoroscopic assessment of scope progression could be reduced further with increasing experience.

References

• 1 Micksche M, Lynge E, Diehl V. et al . and Groupe des Experts Cancérologue de l’Union Européenne. Recommendations on cancer screening in the European Union [in French, no abstract].  Bull Cancer. 2001;  88 687-692
• 2 Anderson J C, Gonzalez J D, Messina C R, Pollack B J. Factors that predict incomplete colonoscopy: thinner is not always better.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;  95 2784-2787
• 3 Waye J D, Yessayan S A, Lewis B S, Fabry T L. The technique of abdominal pressure in total colonoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 147-151
• 4 Belaiche J, van Kemseke C, Louis E. Use of the enteroscope for colo-ileoscopy: low yield in unexplained lower gastrointestinal bleeding.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 298-301
• 5 Marshall J B, Perez R A, Madsen R W. Usefulness of a pediatric colonoscope for routine colonoscopy in women who have undergone hysterectomy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 838-841
• 6 Rex D K, Goodwine B W. Method of colonoscopy in 42 consecutive patients presenting after prior incomplete colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2002;  97 1148-1151
• 7 Ruffolo T A, Lehman G A, Rex D. Colonoscope damage from internal straightener use.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1991;  37 107-108
• 8 Yamamoto H, Kita H, Sugano K. Other applications of double balloon technique. In: Sugano K, Yamamoto H, Kita H (eds). Double balloon endoscopy. Heidelberg; Springer 2006: 101-113
• 9 May A, Nachbar L, Ell C. Push-and-pull enteroscopy using a single-balloon technique for difficult colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 395-398
• 10 Napoleon B, Ponchon T, Lefebvre R. et al . French Society of Digestive Endoscopy (SFED) guidelines on performing a colonoscopy.  Endoscopy. 2006;  38 1152-1155
• 11 Yamamoto H, Sekine Y, Sato Y. et al . Total enteroscopy with a nonsurgical steerable double-balloon method.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  53 216-220
• 12 Vucelic B, Rex D, Pulanic R. et al . The Aer-O-Scope: proof of concept of a pneumatic, skill-independent, self-propelling, self-navigating colonoscope.  Gastroenterology. 2006;  130 672-677
• 13 Horiuchi A, Nakayama Y, Kajiyama M. et al . Usefulness of a small-caliber, variable-stiffness colonoscope as a backup in patients with difficult or incomplete colonoscopy.  Am J Gastroenterol. 2004;  99 1936-1940
• 14 Rösch T, Adler A, Wiedenman B H, Hoepffner N. A prospective pilot study to assess technical performance of a new single use colonoscope with inverted sleeve technology [abstract].  Gastrointest Endosc. 2007;  65 AB340