Endoscopy 2007; 39(11): 937-941
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966857
Original article

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: A prospective comparative study

M.  Kato1 , M.  Kaise1 , J.  Yonezawa1 , Y.  Yoshida1 , H.  Tajiri1, 2
  • 1Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
  • 2Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
Further Information

Publication History

submitted 17 December 2006

accepted after revision 14 June 2007

Publication Date:
16 November 2007 (online)

Background and study aims: Preliminary studies have suggested autofluorescence endoscopy (AFE) to be accurate in the diagnosis of gastric tumors. Our prospective blinded study systematically compared AFE with white light endoscopy (WLE) for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia.

Patients and methods: An enriched population included 33 patients with superficial gastric neoplasia referred for endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD), and 18 control patients undergoing follow-up endoscopy after curative ESD. At the direction of a study coordinator, two endoscopists who were blinded to the patient’s history and to each other’s findings, performed WLE followed by AFE or performed AFE alone, in random order. Both endoscopists independently recorded the presence of lesions seen at AFE and WLE. All lesions identified in either test were biopsied and the pathological results were used as the gold standard.

Results: 39 gastric neoplasias were histologically confirmed and 52 non-neoplastic lesions were found to be either WLE- and/or AFE-positive. Sensitivities of WLE and AFE alone were 74 % vs. 64 % (n. s.) and specificities were 83 % vs. 40 % (P = 0.0003), respectively. WLE followed by AFE had a sensitivity of 69 % (n. s.) and a specificity of 64 % (P = 0.046 compared with WLE alone). Of all neoplasias finally diagnosed, 13 % (or in the case of elevated neoplasias, 23 %) were detected by AFE but not by WLE.

Conclusions: Although one quarter of elevated gastric neoplasias were detected only by AFE, its specificity is poor; therefore its clinical value is limited.

References

  • 1 Rall D P, Loo T L, Lane M. et al . Appearance and persistence of fluorescence material in tumor tissue after tetracycline administration.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1957;  19 79-85
  • 2 Panjehpour M, Overholt B F, Vo-Dinh T. et al . Endoscopic fluorescence detection of high-grade dysplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastroenterology. 1996;  111 93-101
  • 3 Vo-Dinh T, Panjehpour M, Overholt B F. Laser-induced fluorescence for esophageal cancer and dysplasia.  Ann NY Acad Sci. 1998;  838 116-122
  • 4 Mayinger B, Neidhardt S, Reh H. et al . Fluorescence induced with 5 aminolevulinic acid for the endoscopic detection and follow-up of esophageal lesions.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 572-578
  • 5 Mayinger B, Horner P, Jordan M. et al . Light-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy for the endoscopic detection of esophageal cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;  54 195-201
  • 6 Kara M A, Peters F P, ten Kate F JW. et al . Endoscopic video autofluorescence imaging may improve the detection of early neoplasia in patients with Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 679-685
  • 7 Kobayashi M, Tajiri H, Seike E. et al . Detection of early gastric cancers by a real-time autofluorescence imaging system.  Cancer Lett. 2001;  165 155-159
  • 8 Chwirot B W, Chwirot S, Jedrzejczyk W. et al . Ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence of human stomach tissues:detection of cancer tissues by imaging techniques.  Laser Surg Med. 1997;  21 149-158
  • 9 Berk J E, Burland W J, Irland M J. et al . Description of fluorometer for use in fluorescence test for gastric cancer.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1964;  10 16-17
  • 10 Bhunchet E, Hatakawa H, Sakai Y. et al . Fluorescein electronic endoscopy: a novel method for detection of early stage gastric cancer not evident to routine endoscopy.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2002;  55 562-571
  • 11 Izuishi K, Tajiri H, Fujii T. et al . The histological basis of detection of adenoma and cancer in the colon by autofluorescence endoscopic imaging.  Endoscopy. 1999;  31 1-6
  • 12 Thomas D W, James M C, Michael S F. et al . In vivo identification of colonic dysplasia using fluorescence endoscopic imaging.  Gastrointest Endosc. 1999;  49 447-455
  • 13 Schomacker K T, Frisoli J K, Compton C C. et al . Ultraviolet laser-induced fluorescence of colonic polyps.  Gastroenterology. 1992;  102 1155-1161
  • 14 Kapadia C R, Cutruzzola F W, O’Brien K M. et al . Laser-induced fluorescence spectroscopy of human colonic mucosa:detection of adenomatous transformation.  Gastroenterology. 1990;  99 150-157
  • 15 Kara M A, Smits M E, Rosmolen W D. et al . A randomized crossover study comparing light-induced fluorescence endoscopy with standard videoendoscopy for the detection of early neoplasia in Barrett’s esophagus.  Gastrointest Endosc. 2005;  61 671-678
  • 16 Schlemper R J, Riddell R H, Kato Y. et al . The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia.  Gut. 2000;  47 251-255
  • 17 Dixon M F. Gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia: Vienna revisited.  Gut. 2002;  51 130-131
  • 18 Abe S, Izuishi K, Tajiri H. et al . Correlation of in vitro autofluorescence endoscopy images with histopathologic findings in stomach cancer.  Endoscopy. 2000;  32 281-286
  • 19 Ohkawa A, Miwa H, Namihisa A. et al . Diagnostic performance of light-induced fluorescence endoscopy for gastric neoplasms.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 515-521
  • 20 Nakayoshi T, Tajiri H, Matsuda K. et al . Magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging system for early gastric cancer.  Endoscopy. 2004;  36 1080-1084

M. Kaise, MD

Department of Endoscopy
The Jikei University School of Medicine

3-25-8, Nishishinbashi, Minato-ku
Tokyo 105-8461
Japan

Fax: + 81-3-34594524

Email: kaise@jikei.ac.jp

    >