Download PDF
Semin Hear 2007; 28(2): 110-119
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-973437
Published in 2007 by Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc., 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Perceptual Training of Phoneme Identification for Hearing Loss

David L. Woods1 , 2 , E. William Yund1
  • 1Human Cognitive Neurophysiology Laboratory, VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, California
  • 2Department of Neurology, University of California Davis, Martinez, California
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 April 2007 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Synaptic connections in the auditory system change throughout life in response to the changing acoustic environment. These changes help to compensate for sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and the consequent impairment of high-frequency hearing by enhancing the efficiency of synaptic transmission of low-frequency signals. They also help to compensate for the inevitable deterioration in the central auditory system that occurs with normal aging even without clinically significant hearing loss. However, in many cases the neuroplastic changes are insufficient to maintain optimal speech comprehension. Indeed, the enhanced transmission of low-frequency phonetic cues that occurs with longstanding SNHL may interfere with a patient's ability to use the high-frequency phonetic cues that are restored by hearing aids. Adaptive perceptual training using tasks that require high-frequency phonetic cue processing can drive neuroplastic change in auditory cortex to improve speech discrimination. The authors tested the benefits of at-home personal computer-based phoneme identification training in new hearing aid (HA) users and found that it produced significant benefit in phoneme identification by reducing phonetic confusions and enhancing the patient's abilities to identify previously difficult syllables. Perceptual training is a promising and cost-effective tool for enhancing speech perception in HA users who have difficulty in understanding everyday speech.

KEYWORDS

Computer-based training - hearing aids - speech perception - phonemes - neuroplasticity - adaptive learning

REFERENCES

  • 1 Syka J. Plastic changes in the central auditory system after hearing loss, restoration of function, and during learning.  Physiol Rev. 2002;  82(3) 601-636
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Trachtenberg J T, Chen B E, Knott G W et al.. Long-term in vivo imaging of experience-dependent synaptic plasticity in adult cortex.  Nature. 2002;  420(6917) 788-794
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Tailby C, Wright L L, Metha A B, Calford M B. Activity-dependent maintenance and growth of dendrites in adult cortex.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2005;  102(12) 4631-4636
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Wang X. The unexpected consequences of a noisy environment.  Trends Neurosci. 2004;  27(7) 364-366
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kuhl P K. Early language acquisition: cracking the speech code.  Nat Rev Neurosci. 2004;  5(11) 831-843
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Chisolm T H, Willott J F, Lister J J. The aging auditory system: anatomic and physiologic changes and implications for rehabilitation.  Int J Audiol. 2003;  42(Suppl 2) 2S3-10
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Dubno J R, Levitt H. Predicting consonant confusions from acoustic analysis.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1981;  69(1) 249-261
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Nilsson M, Soli S D, Sullivan J A. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1994;  95(2) 1085-1099
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Boothroyd A. Perception of speech pattern contrasts from auditory presentation of voice fundamental frequency.  Ear Hear. 1988;  9(6) 313-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Kuk F, Keenan D, Lau C C, Dinulescu N, Cortez R, Keogh P. Real-world performance of a reverse-horn vent.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;  16(9) 653-661
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Pearsons K S, Bennett R L, Fidell S. Speech levels in various noise environments. In: EPA EPA-600/1-77-025. Vol 600 Washington, DC; Office of Health and Ecological Effects 1977
    Google Scholar
  • 12 Saunders G H, Cienkowski K M. Acclimatization to hearing aids.  Ear Hear. 1997;  18(2) 129-139
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Ricketts T, Henry P, Gnewikow D. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.  Ear Hear. 2003;  24(5) 424-439
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Revoile S G, Holden-Pitt L, Pickett J M. Perceptual cues to the voiced-voiceless distinction of final fricatives for listeners with impaired or with normal hearing.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1985;  77(3) 1263-1265
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Hedrick M S, Younger M S. Labeling of /s/ and [see text] by listeners with normal and impaired hearing, revisited.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;  46(3) 636-648
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Launer L J, Berger K, Breteler M M et al.. Regional variability in the prevalence of cerebral white matter lesions: an MRI study in 9 European countries (CASCADE).  Neuroepidemiology. 2006;  26(1) 23-29
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Salat D H, Buckner R L, Snyder A Z et al.. Thinning of the cerebral cortex in aging.  Cereb Cortex. 2004;  14(7) 721-730
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ge Y, Grossman R I, Babb J S, Rabin M L, Mannon L J, Kolson D L. Age-related total gray matter and white matter changes in normal adult brain. Part II: quantitative magnetization transfer ratio histogram analysis.  Am J Neuroradiol. 2002;  23(8) 1334-1341
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Frisina R D, Walton J P. Age-related structural and functional changes in the cochlear nucleus.  Hear Res. 2006;  216-217 216-223
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Willott J F, Hnath Chisolm T, Lister J J. Modulation of presbycusis: current status and future directions.  Audiol Neurootol. 2001;  6(5) 231-249
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Divenyi P L, Stark P B, Haupt K M. Decline of speech understanding and auditory thresholds in the elderly.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2005;  118(2) 1089-1100
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Schneider B A, Daneman M, Murphy D R. Speech comprehension difficulties in older adults: cognitive slowing or age-related changes in hearing?.  Psychol Aging. 2005;  20(2) 261-271
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Edeline J M. Learning-induced physiological plasticity in the thalamo-cortical sensory systems: a critical evaluation of receptive field plasticity, map changes and their potential mechanisms.  Prog Neurobiol. 1999;  57 165-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Robertson I H, Murre J M. Rehabilitation of brain damage: brain plasticity and principles of guided recovery.  Psychol Bull. 1999;  125(5) 544-575
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Stecker G C, Bowman G A, Yund E W, Herron T J, Roup C M, Woods D L. Perceptual training improves syllable identification in new and experienced hearing-aid users.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;  43 537-552
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Yund E W, Roup C M, Simon H J, Bowman G A. Acclimatization in wide dynamic range multichannel compression and linear hearing aids.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2006;  43 517-535
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Boothroyd A, Nittrouer S. Mathematical treatment of context effects in phoneme and word recognition.  J Acoust Soc Am. 1988;  84(1) 101-114
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Benki J R. Quantitative evaluation of lexical status, word frequency, and neighborhood density as context effects in spoken word recognition.  J Acoust Soc Am. 2003;  113(3) 1689-1705
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 McCoy S L, Tun P A, Cox L C, Colangelo M, Stewart R A, Wingfield A. Hearing loss and perceptual effort: downstream effects on older adults' memory for speech.  Q J Exp Psychol A. 2005;  58(1) 22-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Wingfield A, Tun P A, McCoy S L. Hearing loss in older adulthood: What it is and how it interacts with cognitive performance.  Curr Dir Psych Sci.. 2005;  14 144-148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Ahissar M. Perceptual training: a tool for both modifying the brain and exploring it.  Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;  98(21) 11842-11843
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Goldstone R L. Perceptual learning.  Annu Rev Psychol. 1998;  49 585-612
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Krakauer J W. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation.  Curr Opin Neurol. 2006;  19(1) 84-90
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Murphy D R, Daneman M, Schneider B A. Why do older adults have difficulty following conversations?.  Psychol Aging. 2006;  21(1) 49-61
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Watson C S. Time course of auditory perceptual learning.  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl. 1980;  89(5 Pt 2) 96-102
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Willott J F. Physiological plasticity in the auditory system and its possible relevance to hearing aid use, deprivation effects, and acclimatization.  Ear Hear. 1996;  17(3 Suppl) 66S-77S
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Sweetow R W, Henderson Sabes J. The need for and development of an adaptive listening and communication enhancement (LACE) program.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2006;  17 538-558
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Sweetow R, Palmer C V. Efficacy of individual auditory training in adults: a systematic review of the evidence.  J Am Acad Audiol. 2005;  16(7) 494-504
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar

David Woods

Neurology Service (127E), Building R4, VANCHCS

150 Muir Rd., Martinez, CA 94553

Email: dlwoods@ucdavis.edu

      >