Download PDF
Informationen aus Orthodontie & Kieferorthopädie 2008; 40(1): 83-93
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1004771
Übersichtsartikel

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

Behandlung der Klasse-III-Dysgnathie mit Erweiterung und Vorverlagerung des Oberkiefers[1]

Treatment of the Class III Malocclusion with Maxillary Expansion and ProtractionP. K. Turley1
  • 1Sections of Orthodontics and Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of California, USA
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
05 June 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Zusammenfassung

Obwohl die frühe kieferorthopädische Behandlung in den letzten Jahren einer kritischen Prüfung unterzogen wurde, ist die Notwendigkeit einer frühen Diagnose und Therapie der skelettalen Klasse III allgemein anerkannt. Die meisten Klasse-III-Patienten entwickeln einen retrudierten Oberkiefer mit einem normalen bis negativen Overbite und sind somit ideal geeignet für die kombinierte Behandlung mit einer Expansionsapparatur und einer Protraktionsmaske. Zu der Vorverlagerung der Maxilla bewirkt die Therapie mittels Gesichtsmaske eine Counterclockwise-Rotation des Oberkiefers und eine Clockwise-Rotation des Unterkiefers mit dem Ergebnis, dass die untere Gesichtshöhe ansteigt und das Profil konvexer erscheint. Die frühe Behandlung ist verbunden mit einer besseren Mitarbeit des Patienten und wahrscheinlich mit einem besseren orthopädischen Ergebnis; allerdings kann die Behandlung im Wechselgebiss oder im bleibenden Gebiss ebenfalls günstige Resultate liefern. Eine Überkorrektur ist empfehlenswert, da behandelte Patienten nach Behandlungsende ähnlich wie die unbehandelten Klasse-III-Patienten wachsen. Eine Behandlung über einen kurzen Zeitraum (2-3 Jahre) führt zu guter Stabilität, bei wenigen Patienten ist jedoch noch eine anschließende Therapie mittels Gesichtsmaske nötig.

Abstract

Although some early orthodontic procedures have come under scrutiny in recent years, the need for early identification and treatment of the skeletal Class III malocclusion has become even more universally accepted. Most Class III patients display a retruded maxilla with a normal to deep overbite and are ideally suited for treatment with maxillary expansion and protraction. In addition to maxillary advancement, facemask therapy rotates the maxilla in a counterclockwise direction, and the mandible in a clockwise direction, which results in an increase in lower face height and a profile that is more convex. Early intervention is associated with better patient compliance and possibly a better orthopedic response; however, treatment in the mixed or permanent dentition can produce favorable results. Overcorrection is recommended because treated patients grow similarly to untreated Class III patients after treatment. Treatment in the short term (2-3 years) shows good stability with a minority of patients requiring later facemask therapy.

Schlüsselwörter

Klasse-III-Dysgnathie - Gaumennahterweiterung - Gesichtsmaske

Key words

Class III malocclusion - rapid maxillary expansion - face mask

1 Der Artikel erschien erstmals in der Zeitschrift: Semin Orthod 2007; 13: 143-157. Der Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung.

Literatur

  • 1 Gianelly A A. One-phase versus two-phase treatment.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;  13 145-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Harrison R L, Kennedy D B, Leggott J P et al. The association of simple anterior dental crossbite to gingival margin discrepancy.  Pediatr Dent. 1991;  13 296-300
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Harrison R L, Kennedy D H, Leggott J P. Anterior dental crossbite: relationship between incisor crown length and incisor irregularity before and after orthodontic treatment.  Pediatr Dent. 1993;  15 394-397
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Muto T, Kawakarni J, Kanazawa M et al. Relationship between disc displacement and morphologic features of skeletal Class III malocclusion.  Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1998;  13 145-151
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Kobayashi T, Honma K, Izumi K et al. Temporomandibular joint symptoms and disc displacement in patients with mandibular prognathism.  Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1999;  37 455-458
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Wisth J. Mandibular function and dysfunction in patients with mandibular prognathism.  Am J Orthod. 1984;  85 193-198
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Gavakos K, Witt E. The functional status of orthodontically treated prognathic patients.  Eur J Orthod. 1991;  13 124-128
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Macdonald K E, Kapust A J, Turley P K. Cephalometric changes after the correction of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion / facemask therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1999;  116 13-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Miyajima K, McNarnara Jr J A, Sana M et al. An estimation of craniofacial growth in the untreated Class III female with anterior crossbite.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;  112 425-434
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Turley P K. Orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion with palatal expansion and custom protraction headgear.  J Clin Orthod. 1988;  22 314-325
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Saadia M, Torres E. Sagittal changes after maxillary protraction with expansion in Class III patients in the primary, mixed, and late mixed dentitions. A longitudinal retrospective study.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;  117 669-680
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Turley P K. Orthopedic correction of Class III malocclusion: retention and phase II therapy.  J Clin Orthod. 1996;  30 313-324
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Turley P K. Management of common orthodontic problems. In: Barber TK, Luke LS (eds). Pediatric Dentistry. J Wright / PSG, Boston 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Eismann D, Prusas R. Periodontal findings before and after orthodontic therapy in cases of incisor crossbite.  Eur J Orthod. 1990;  12 281-283
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Sohn B W, Miyawaki S, Noguchi H et al. Changes in jaw movement and jaw closing muscle activity after orthodontic correction of incisor crossbite.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;  112 403-409
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Kerr W JS. Mandibular position in Class III malocclusion.  Br J Orthod. 1988;  15 241-245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Tsai H-H. Components of anterior crossbite in the primary dentition.  J Dent Child. 2001;  68 27-32
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Ellis E, McNamara Jr J A. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.  Am J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1984;  42 L 295-305
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Guyer E C, Ellis E, McNamara Jr J A et al. Components of Class III malocclusion in juveniles and adolescents.  Angle Orthod. 1986;  56 7-30
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Sue G, Chaconas S J, Turley P K et al. Indicators of Class III skeletal growth.  J Dent Res. 1987;  66 348
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Williams S, Andersen C E. The morphology of the potential Class III skeletal pattern in the growing child.  Am J Orthod. 1986;  89 302-311
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Hopkin G B. Craniofacial pattern in mesio-occlusion.  Nederlandse Verein Orthod Stud. 1965;  1 81-105
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Hopkin G B, Houston W JB, James G A. The cranial base as an aetiological factor in malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1968;  38 250-255
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Jacobson A, Evans W G, Preston C B et al. Mandibular prognathism.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1974;  66 140-171
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Steiner C C. The use of cephalometrics as an aid to planning and assessing orthodontic treatment.  Am J Orthod. 1960;  46 721-735
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Harvold E P. The Activator in Orthodontics. CV Mosby, St. Louis 1974
    Google Scholar
  • 27 Ricketts R M. Perspectives in the clinical application of cephalometrics.  Angle Orthod. 1981;  51 115-150
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 McNamara Jr J A. A method of cephalometric analysis. In: McNamara Jr JA (ed). Clinical Alteration of the Growing Face. Monograph 12, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, Ann Arbor, University of Michigan 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Broadbent Sr B H, Broadbent Jr B H, Golden W H. Bolton standards of dentofacial developmental growth. CV Mosby, St. Louis 1975
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Bishara S E. Facial and dental changes in adolescents and their clinical implications.  Angle Orthod. 2000;  70 471-483
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Mounkeh M. Cephalometric evaluation of craniofacial pattern of Syrian children with Class III malocclusion.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;  119 640-649
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nartallo-Turley P E, Turley P K. Cephalometric effects of combined palatal expansion and facemask therapy on Class III malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1998;  68 217-224
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Baccetti T, McGill J S, Franchi L et al. Skeletal effects of early treatment of Class III malocclusion with maxillary expansion and face-mask therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 333-343
    Google Scholar
  • 34 Baik H S. Clinical results of maxillary protraction in Korean children.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;  108 583-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Chong Y H, Ive J C, Artun J. Changes following the use of protraction headgear for early correction of Class III malocclusion.  Angle Orthod. 1996;  66 351-362
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Gallagher W, Miranda F, Buschang P H. Maxillary protraction: treatment and post-treatment effects.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 612-619
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Kapust A J, Sinclair P M, Turley P K. Cephalometric effects of face mask / expansion therapy in Class III children. A comparison of three age groups.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 204-212
    Google Scholar
  • 38 Kilicoglu H, Kirlic Y. Profile changes in patients with Class III malocclusions after Delaire mask therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 453-462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Mermigos J, Full C A, Andreasen G. Protraction of the maxillofacial complex.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1990;  98 47-55
    Google Scholar
  • 40 Ngan P W, Hagg U, Yiu C et al. Treatment response and long term dentofacial adaptations to maxillary expansion and protraction.  Semin Orthod. 1997;  3 255-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Pangrazio-Kulbersh V. Effects of protraction mechanics on the midface.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  114 484-491
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 da Silva Q G, Magro A C, Capelozza L. Early treatment of the Class III malocclusion with rapid maxilIary expansion and maxillary protraction.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 196-203
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Sung S J, Baik H S. Assessment of skeletal and dental changes by maxillary protraction.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  14 492-502
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Wiiliams M D, Sarver D M, Sadowsky P L et al. Combined rapid maxillary expansion and protraction facemask in the treatment of Class III malocclusions in growing children: a prospective long term study.  Semin Orthod. 1997;  3 265-274
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Wisth P J, Tritapunt A, Rygh P et al. The effect of maxillary protraction on front occlusion and facial morphology.  Acta Odontol Scand. 1987;  45 227-237
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Tulloch J FC, Philips C, Proffit W R. Benefit of early Class II treatment: progress report of a 2-phase randomized clinical trial.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 62-72
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Keeling S D, Wheeler V P, King G J et al. Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 40-50
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Ghafari J, Shofer F S, Jacobsson-Hunt U et al. Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division I malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  113 51-61
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Proffit W R. Contemporary Orthodontics. 2nd ed. Mosby, St. Louis 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 50 Merwin D, Ngan P, Hägg U et al. Timing for effective application of anteriorly directed orthopedic force to maxilla.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1997;  112 292-299
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr J A. Shape-coordinate analysis of skeletal changes induced by rapid maxillary expansion and facial mask therapy.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998;  114 418-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Anderson D L, Thompson G W, Popovich F. Interrelationships of dental maturity, height, and weight from 4 to 14 years.  Growth. 1975;  36 453-462
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Demirjian A, Buschang P H, Tanguy R et al. Interrelationships among measures of somatic, skeletal, dental and sexual maturity.  Am J Orthod. 1985;  88 433-438
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Björk A, Helm S. Prediction of the age of maximum pubertal growth in body height.  Angle Orthod. 1967;  37 134-143
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Kuroda T, Natori H, Kawanobe O. Prediction of the age at maximum pubertal growth ossification of the adductor sesanicid of thumb in Japanese children.  J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1969;  28 68-73
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Sato K, Abe M, Shirato Y et al. Standard growth curve of maxilla and mandible applied to the growth prediction based on standards of bone age (Tanner-Whitehouse 2 method) for Japanese females.  Jpn J Orthod Soc. 1996;  55 545-548
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Bergersen E O. The male adolescent facial growth spurt: its prediction and relation to skeletal maturation.  Angle Orthod. 1972;  42 319-338
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Iwara R. The relationship of complete fusion time on the distal phalanx of the first digit and mandibular growth.  J Jpn Orthod Soc. 1994;  53 1-9
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Bowden B D. Epiphysial changes in the hand / wrist area as indicators of adolescent stage.  Aust Orthodont J. 1976;  4 87-104
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Fishman L S. Radiographic evaluation of skeletal maturation: a clinically oriented method based on hand-wrist films.  Angle Orthod. 1982;  52 88-112
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Tanner J M, Whitehouse R H, Cameron N et al. Assessment of skeletal maturity and prediction of adult height (TW2 method). Academic Press, San Diego 1983
    Google Scholar
  • 62 Murata M, Matsuo N, Tanaka T et al. Atlas of Standard Bone Maturation for Japanese: Based on TW2 Method. Kanehara Shuppan, Tokyo 1993
    Google Scholar
  • 63 Goto S, Kondo T, Negoro T et al. Ossification of the distal phalanx of the first digit as a maturity indicator for initiation of orthodontic treatment of Class III malocclusion in Japanese women.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;  110 490-501
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara Jr J A. Thin-plate spline analysis of mandibular growth.  Angle Orthod. 2001;  71 83-92
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 Suda N, Ishii-Suzuki M, Hirose K et al. Effective treatment plan for maxillary protraction: is the bone age useful to determine the treatment plan?.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000;  118 56-62
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Johnston Jr L E. A comparative analysis of Class TI treatments. In: Vig PS, Ribbens KA (eds). Science and Clinical Judgment in Orthodontics. Monograph No. 19, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1986; 103-148
    Google Scholar
  • 67 McGill J. Orthopedic alteration induced by rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy. Master's Thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 68 Shanker S, Ngan P, Wade D et al. Cephalometric A point changes during and after maxillary protraction and expansion.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996;  110 423-430
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Westwood P V, McNamara J A, Baccetti T, Franchi L, Sarver D M. Long term effects of Class III treatment with rapid maxillary expansion and facemask therapy followed by fixed appliances.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;  123 306-320
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Franchi L, Baccetti T, McNamara J A. Postpubertal assessment of treatment timing for maxillary expansion and protraction therapy followed by fixed appliances.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004;  126 555-568
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 McNamara J A. An orthopedic approach to the treatment of Class III malocclusion in young patients.  J Clin Orthod. 1987;  21 598-608
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Haas A J. Rapid expansion of the maxillary dental arch and nasal cavity by opening the mid-palatal suture.  Angle Orthod. 1961;  31 73-90
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 73 Wertz R A. Skeletal and dental changes accompanying rapid midpalatal suture opening.  Am J Orthod. 1970;  58 41-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Wertz R A. Midpalatal suture opening: a normative study.  Am J Orthod. 1977;  71 367-381
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 da Silva O G, Boas M CV, Capelozza L. Rapid maxillary expansion in the primary and mixed dentition: a cephalometric evaluation.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991;  100 171-181
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Vaughn G, Mason B, Moon H-B et al. The effects of maxillary protraction therapy with or without rapid palatal expansion: a prospective, randomized clinical trial.  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;  128 299-309
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 77 Behrents R G. Growth in the Aging Craniofacial Skeleton. Monograph 17, Craniofacial Growth Series. Center for Human Growth and Development, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 1985
    Google Scholar

1 Der Artikel erschien erstmals in der Zeitschrift: Semin Orthod 2007; 13: 143-157. Der Abdruck erfolgt mit freundlicher Genehmigung.

Prof. emer. Dr. P. Turley

3104 The Strand

USA-Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

Phone: +0 01 / 3 10 / 5 46 50 97

Email: info@drpatrickturley.com

      >