Download PDF
Semin Speech Lang 2008; 29(1): 071-082
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1061626
© Thieme Medical Publishers

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Semantic-Based Treatment for Naming Deficits in Aphasia: What Works?

Swathi Kiran1 , Gina Bassetto1
  • 1Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
28 April 2008 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

This article reviews the basic principles and evidence for the effectiveness of a semantic-based treatment for naming deficits in aphasia. This article focuses on three aspects of semantic-based treatment. First, the theoretical basis for semantic treatment approaches to alleviate naming deficits is explained. Second, the different types of semantic treatment approaches (i.e., substitutive and restitutive treatments) are reviewed. More attention is provided to restitutive treatment approaches, and some ideas regarding why these treatments may be effective are discussed. We argue that strengthening access to impaired semantic and phonologic representations and facilitating generalization to untrained but related targets are two factors determining the success of a restitutive-based semantic treatment. Finally, in the third section of the article, the effect of semantic treatment on the overall communicative effectiveness and suggestions for future research in this field are discussed.

KEYWORDS

Semantic treatment - aphasia - generalization - typicality

REFERENCES

  • 1 Goodglass H. Disorders of naming following brain injury.  Am Sci. 1980;  68 647-655
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Levelt W JM, Roelofs A, Meyer A S. A theory of lexical access in speech production.  Brain Behav Sci. 1999;  22 1-75
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dell G S. A spreading activation theory of retrieval in sentence production.  Psychol Rev. 1986;  92 283-321
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Butterworth B. Lexical access in speech production. In: Wilson WM Lexical Representation and Process. Cambridge, MA; MIT Press 1989: 108-235
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Butterworth B, Howard D, McLoughlin P. The semantic deficit in aphasia: the relationship between semantic errors in auditory comprehension and picture naming.  Neuropsychologia. 1984;  22 409-426
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Levelt W. Accessing words in speech production: stages, processes and representations.  Cognition. 1992;  42 1-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Levelt W. Spoken word production: a theory of lexical access.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;  98 13464-13471
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Humphreys G W, Riddoch M J, Quinlan P T. Cascade processes in picture identification.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1988;  5 67-103
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Dell G S, O'Seaghdha P. Stages of lexical access in language production.  Cognition. 1992;  42 287-314
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Dell G S, Lawler E N, Harris H D, Gordon J K. Models of errors of omission in aphasic naming.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;  21 125-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Dell G S, Schwartz M F, Martin N M, Saffran E M, Gagnon D A. Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers.  Psychol Rev. 1997;  104 801-838
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Schwartz M F, Wilshire C E, Gagnon D A, Polansky M. Origins of nonword phonological errors in aphasic picture naming.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 2004;  21 159-186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Schwartz M F, Dell G S, Martin N, Gahl S, Sobel P. A case-series test of the interactive two-step model of lexical access: evidence from picture naming.  J Mem Lang. 2006;  54 228-264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Cuetos F, Aguado G, Caramazza A. Dissociation of semantic and phonological errors in naming.  Brain Lang. 2000;  75 451-460
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Caramazza A, Papagno C, Ruml W. The selective impairment of phonological processing in speech production.  Brain Lang. 2000;  75 428-450
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Caramazza A, Hillis A E. Where do semantic errors come from?.  Cortex. 1990;  26 95-122
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Hillis A E, Rapp B C, Romani C, Caramazza A. Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1990;  7 191-243
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Howard D, Gatehouse C. Distinguishing semantic and lexical word retreival deficits in people with aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2006;  20 921-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Nickels L, Best W. Therapy for naming disorder: part I. Principles, puzzles, and progress.  Aphasiology. 1996;  10 21-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Best W, Nickels L. From theory to therapy in aphasia: where are we now and where to next?.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2000;  10 231-247
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Nickels L. Therapy for naming disorders: revisiting, revising, and reviewing.  Aphasiology. 2002;  16 935-979
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Maher L M, Raymer A M. Management of anomia.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2004;  11 10-21
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rothi L J. Behavioral compensation in the treatment of acquired language disorders resulting from brain damage. In: Dixon RA, Mackman L Compensating for Psychological Deficits and Declines: Managing Losses and Promoting Gains. Mahwah, NJ; Erlbaum 1995: 219-230
    Google Scholar
  • 24 Rose M. The utility of arm and hand gestures in the treatment of aphasia.  Adv Speech Lang Pathol. 2006;  8 92-109
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Luria A R. Traumatic Aphasia. The Hague; Mouton 1970
    Google Scholar
  • 26 Fridriksson J. Spaced retrieval treatment of anomia.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 99-109
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Renvall K, Laine M, Martin N. Treatment of anomia with contextual priming: Exploration of a modified procedure with additional semantic and phonological tasks.  Aphasiology. 2007;  21 499-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Barbay S, Plautz E J, Friel K M et al.. Behavioral and neurophysiological effects of delayed training following a small ischemic infarct in primary motor cortex of squirrel monkeys.  Exp Brain Res. 2006;  169 106-116
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Nudo R J. Functional and structural plasticity in motor cortex: implications for stroke recovery.  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;  14 S57-S76
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Nudo R J, Milliken G W. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys.  J Neurophysiol. 1996;  75 2144-2149
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Plautz E J, Barbay S, Frost S B et al.. Post-infarct cortical plasticity and behavioral recovery using concurrent cortical stimulation and rehabilitative training: a feasibility study in primates.  Neurol Res. 2003;  25 801-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Nudo R J, Wise B M, SiFuentes F, Milliken G W. Neural substrates for the effects of rehabilitative training on motor recovery after ischemic infarct.  Science. 1996;  272 1791-1794
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Xerri C, Merzenich M M, Peterson B E, Jenkins W. Plasticity of primary somatosensory cortex paralleling sensorimotor skill recovery from stroke in adult monkeys.  J Neurophysiol. 1998;  79 2119-2148
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Taub E, Uswatte G, Morris D M. Improved motor recovery after stroke and massive cortical reorganization following constraint-induced movement therapy.  Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2003;  14 S77-S91,ix
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Howard D, Patterson K, Franklin S, Orchid-Lisle V, Morton J. The facilitation of picture naming in aphasia.  Cogn Neuropsychol. 1985;  2 49-80
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Howard D, Patterson K, Franklin S, Orchard-Lisle V, Morton J. Treatment of word retrieval deficits in aphasia.  Brain. 1985;  108 817-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Marshall J, Pound C, White-Thompson M, Pring T. The use of picture/word matching tasks to assist word retreival in aphasic patients.  Aphasiology. 1990;  4 167-184
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Nickels L, Best W. Therapy for naming disorders (part II): specifics, surprises and suggestions.  Aphasiology. 1996;  10 109-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Davis A, Pring T. Therapy for word-finding deficits: more on the effects of semantic and phonological approaches to treatment with dysphasic patients.  Neuropsychol Rehabil. 1991;  1 135-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Pring T, Hamilton A, Harwood A, Macbride L. Generalization of naming after picture/word matching tasks: only items appearing in therapy benefit.  Aphasiology. 1993;  7 383-394
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Hillis A E. Treatment of naming disorders: new issues regarding old therapies.  J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 1998;  4 648-660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Visch-Brink E G, Bajema I M, Van De Sandt-Koenderman M E. Lexical semantic therapy: BOX.  Aphasiology. 1997;  11 1057-1115
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Herbert R, Best W, Hickin J, Howard D, Osborne F. Combining lexical and interactional approaches to therapy for word finding deficits in aphasia.  Aphasiology. 2003;  17 1163-1186
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Haarbaurer-Krupa J, Moser L, Smith G, Sullivan D, Szekeres S F. Cognitive rehabilitation therapy: middle stages of recovery. In: Yvilsaker M Head Injury Rehabilitation: Children and Adolescents. San Diego, CA; College Hill Press 1985
    Google Scholar
  • 45 Boyle M, Coehlo C. Application of semantic feature analysis as a treatment for aphasic dysnomia.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;  4 94-98
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Boyle M. Semantic feature analysis treatment for anomia in two fluent aphasia syndromes.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2004;  13 236-249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Drew R L, Thompson C K. Model-based semantic treatment for naming deficits in aphasia.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999;  42 972-989
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Kiran S, Thompson C K. The role of semantic complexity in treatment of naming deficits: training semantic categories in fluent aphasia by controlling exemplar typicality.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2003;  46 773-787
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Kiran S, Shamapant S. DeLyria. S. Typicality within well defined categories in aphasia.  Brain Lang. 2006;  99 149-151
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Kiran S, Ntourou K, Eubank M, Shamapant S. Typicality of inanimate category examples in aphasia: Further evidence for the semantic complexity effect.  Brain Lang. 2005;  95 178-180
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Rosch E. Cognitive representations of semantic categories.  J Exp Psychol Gen. 1975;  104 192-233
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kiran S. Semantic complexity in the treatment of naming deficits.  Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2007;  16 1-12
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Barsalou L W. Ad hoc categories.  Mem Cognit. 1983;  11 211-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Collins A M, Loftus E F. A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing.  Psychol Rev. 1975;  82 407-428
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Robey R R. A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia.  J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1998;  41 172-187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Robey R R. The efficacy of treatment for aphasic persons: a meta-analysis.  Brain Lang. 1994;  47 582-608
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Beeson P M, Robey R R. Evaluating single-subject treatment research: lessons learned from the aphasia literature.  Neuropsychol Rev. 2006;  16 161-169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Kertesz A, McCabe P. Recovery patterns and prognosis in aphasia.  Brain. 1977;  100 1-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Kertesz A. The Western Aphasia Battery. Philadelphia, PA; Grune and Stratton 1982
    Google Scholar
  • 60 Hinckley J, Carr T. Comparing the outcomes of intensive and non-intensive context-based aphasia treatment.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 965-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Bhogal S K, Teasell R W, Foley N C, Speechley M R. Rehabilitation of aphasia: more is better.  Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;  10 66-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 62 Basso A. How intensive/prolonged should an intensive/prolonged treatment be?.  Aphasiology. 2005;  19 975-984
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Kaplan E, Goodglass H, Weintraub S. Boston Naming Test. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA; Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2001
    Google Scholar

Swathi KiranPh.D. 

CMA 7.210, Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712

Email: s-kiran@mail.utexas.edu

      >