Download PDF
Methods Inf Med 2009; 48(03): 282-290
DOI: 10.3414/ME0570
Original Articles
Schattauer GmbH

Efficiency of CYP2C9 Genetic Test Representation for Automated Pharmacogenetic Decision Support

V. G. Deshmukh
1   University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
M. A. Hoffman
2   Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA
,
C. Arnoldi
2   Cerner Corporation, Kansas City, MO, USA
,
B. E. Bray
1   University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
,
J. A. Mitchell
1   University of Utah, School of Medicine, Department of Biomedical Informatics, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 04 May 2008

accepted: 11 March 2008

Publication Date:
17 January 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: We investigated the suitability of representing discrete genetic test results in the electronic health record (EHR) as individual single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and as alleles, using the CYP2C9 gene and its polymorphic states, as part of a pilot study. The purpose of our investigation was to determine the appropriate level of data abstraction when reporting genetic test results in the EHR that would allow meaningful interpretation and clinical decision support based on current knowledge, while retaining sufficient information in order to enable reinterpretation of the results in the context of future discoveries.

Methods: Based on the SNP & allele models, we designed two separate lab panels within the laboratory information system, one containing SNPs and the other containing alleles, built separate rules in the clinical decision support system based on each model, and evaluated the performance of these rules in an EHR simulation environment using real-world scenarios.

Results: Although decision-support rules based on allele model required significantly less computational time than rules based on SNP model, no difference was observed on the total time taken to chart medication orders between rules based on these two models.

Conclusions: Both, SNP- and allele-based models, can be used effectively for representing genetic test results in the EHR without impacting clinical decision support systems. While storing and reporting genetic test results as alleles allow for the construction of simpler decision-support rules, and make it easier to present these results to clinicians, SNP-based model can retain a greater amount of information that could be useful for future reinterpretation.

Keywords

Pharmacogenetics - clinical decision support systems - SNP - allele
 

  • References

  • 1 International Human Genome Sequencing Consortium. Finishing the euchromatic sequence of the human genome. Nature 2004; 431 7011 931-945.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 GeneTests.org at the University of Washington. http://www.genetests.org. 1-15–2007.
    PubMed
  • 3 Personalised medicines: hopes and realities. http://www.royalsoc.ac.uk/displaypagedoc.asp?id=15874. 9-1–2005. The Royal Society (UK).
    PubMed
  • 4 Collins FS, Green ED, Guttmacher AE, Guyer MS. A vision for the future of genomics research. Nature 2003; 422 6934 835-847.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Mitchell DR, Mitchell JA. Status of clinical gene sequencing data reporting and associated risks for information loss. J Biomed Inform 2007; 40 (01) 47-54.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Health Level 7. http://www.hl7.org. 3-2–2007.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shabo A. Introduction to the Clinical Genomics Specifications and Documentation of the Genotype Topic. HL7 Clinical Genomics SIG DSTU Update 2 (Geno-type topic update 1)[V0.9]. 11-5–2006. HL7.org.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Shabo A, Dotan D. The seventh layer of the clinical-genomics information infrastructure. IBM Systems Journal 2007; 46 (01) 57-67. International Business Machines Corporation.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Bioinformatic Sequence Markup Language.. http://www.bsml.org. 3-2–2007.
    PubMed
  • 10 SNOMED CT. http://www.snomed.org/snomedct. 3-2–2007.
    PubMed
  • 11 McDonald CJ, Huff SM, Suico JG. et al. LOINC, a Universal Standard for Identifying Laboratory Observations: A 5-Year Update. Clin Chem 2003; 49 (04) 624-633.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Hoffman M, Arnoldi C, Chuang I. The clinical bioinformatics ontology: a curated semantic network utilizing RefSeq information. Pac Symp Biocomput 2005; 139-150.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Clinical Bioinformatics Ontology Whitepaper. https://www.clinbioinformatics.org/cbopublic. 2004 Cerner Corporation.
    PubMed
  • 14 Furuya H, Fernandez-Salguero P, Gregory W. et al. Genetic polymorphism of CYP2C9 and its effect on warfarin maintenance dose requirement in patients undergoing anticoagulation therapy. Pharmacogenetics 1995; 5 (06) 389-392.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Rettie AE, Wienkers LC, Gonzalez FJ, Trager WF, Korzekwa KR. Impaired (S)-warfarin metabolism catalysed by the R144C allelic variant of CYP2C9. Pharmacogenetics 1994; 4 (01) 39-42.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Takahashi H, Echizen H. Pharmacogenetics of CYP2C9 and interindividual variability in anticoagulant response to warfarin. Pharmacogenomics J 2003; 3 (04) 202-214.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Stubbins MJ, Harries LW, Smith G, Tarbit MH, Wolf CR. Genetic analysis of the human cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 locus. Pharmacogenetics 1996; 6 (05) 429-439.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Oscarson M, Ingelman-Sundberg M. CYP alleles: a web page for nomenclature of human cytochrome P450 alleles. Drug Metab Pharmacokinet 2002; 17 (06) 491-495.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bell RG, Sadowski JA, Matschiner JT. Mechanism of action of warfarin Warfarin and metabolism of vitamin K 1. Biochemistry 1972; 11 (10) 1959-1961.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Kaminsky LS, Zhang ZY. Human P450 metabolism of warfarin. Pharmacol Ther 1997; 73 (01) 67-74.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Horton JD, Bushwick BM. Warfarin therapy: evolving strategies in anticoagulation. Am Fam Physician 1999; 59 (03) 635-646.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Rost S, Fregin A, Ivaskevicius V. et al. Mutations in VKORC1 cause warfarin resistance and multiple coagulation factor deficiency type 2. Nature 2004; 427 6974 537-541.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 United States Food and Drug Administration.. FDA Approves Updated Warfarin (Coumadin) Prescribing Information. 8-16–2007.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Sconce EA, Khan TI, Wynne HA. et al. The impact of CYP2C9 and VKORC1 genetic polymorphism and patient characteristics upon warfarin dose requirements: proposal for a new dosing regimen. Blood. 2005
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Ackoff RL. From Data to Wisdom. Journal of Applied Systems Analysis 1989; 16: 3-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Aithal GP, Day CP, Kesteven PJ, Daly AK. Association of polymorphisms in the cytochrome P450 CYP2C9 with warfarin dose requirement and risk of bleeding complications. Lancet 1999; 353 9154 717-719.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Guttmacher AE, Collins FS. Welcome to the genomic era. N Engl J Med 2003; 349 (10) 996-998.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Mitchell JA, McCray AT, Bodenreider O. From phenotype to genotype: issues in navigating the available information resources. Methods Inf Med 2003; 42 (05) 557-563.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Martin-Sanchez F, Maojo V, Lopez-Campos G. Integrating genomics into health information systems. Methods Inf Med 2002; 41 (01) 25-30.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Mitchell JA. The impact of genomics on E-health. Stud Health Technol Inform 2004; 106: 63-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Navigenics. http://www.navigenics.com. 9-3–2008.
    PubMed
  • 32 23andMe. https://www.23andme.com. 9-3–2008.
    PubMed
  • 33 Klein TE, Altman RB. PharmGKB: the pharmacogenetics and pharmacogenomics knowledge base. Pharmacogenomics J 2004; 4: 1.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Greenman C, Stephens P, Smith R. et al. Patterns of somatic mutation in human cancer genomes. Nature 2007; 446 7132 153-158.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar