Potential and Requirements of IT for Ambient Assisted Living Technologies^[*]

Summary

Objectives: Ambient Assisted Living (AAL) technologies are developed to enable elderly to live independently and safely. Innovative information technology (IT) can interconnect personal devices and offer suitable user interfaces. Often dedicated solutions are developed for particular projects. The aim of our research was to identify major IT challenges for AAL to enable generic and sustainable solutions.

Methods: Delphi Survey. An online questionnaire was sent to 1800 members of the German Innovation Partnership AAL. The first round was qualitative to collect statements. Statements were reduced to items by qualitative content analysis. Items were assessed in the following two rounds by a 5-point Likert-scale. Quantitative analyses for second and third round: descriptive statistics, factor analysis and ANOVA.

Results: Respondents: 81 in first, 173 in second and 70 in third round. All items got a rather high assessment. Medical issues were rated as having a very high potential. Items related to user-friendliness were regarded as most important requirements. Common requirements to all AAL-solutions are reliability, robustness, availability, data security, data privacy, legal issues, ethical requirements, easy configuration. The complete list of requirements can be used as framework for customizing future AAL projects.

Conclusions: A wide variety of IT issues have been assessed important for AAL. The extensive list of requirements makes obvious that it is not efficient to develop dedicated solutions for individual projects but to provide generic methods and reusable components. Experiences and results from medical informatics research can be used to advance AAL solutions (e.g. eHealth and knowledge-based approaches).

Keywords

Health information technologies - Delphi study - health services for elderly - medical informatics - ambient assisted living

^* Supplementary material published on our website www.methods-online.com

• References

• 1 FUTURAGE: A road map for ageing research (Internet, cited May 13, 2012). Available from. http://futurage.group.shef.ac.uk/home.html.
• 2 Evans RG, McGrail KM, Morgan SG, Barer ML, Hertzman C. APOCALYPSE NO: Population Aging and The Future of Health Care Systems. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement 2001; 20 S [phone].
• 3 Steg H, Strese H, Loroff C, Hull J, Schmidt S. Europe Is Facing a Demographic Challenge Ambient Assisted Living Offers Solutions. Report: VDI-VDE-IT. Berlin: 2010.
• 4 Ludwig W, Wolf K-H. Duwenkamp C, Gusew N, Hellrung N, Marschollek M. et al Health-enabling technologies for the elderly - An overview of services based on a literature review. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 2011; 106 (02) 70-78.
• 5 Demiris G, Hensel BK. Technologies for an aging society: a systematic review of “smart home” applications. Yearbook of Medical Informatics. 2008: 33-40.
• 6 Koch S, Marschollek M, Wolf KH, Plischke M, Haux R. On health-enabling and ambient-assistive technologies. What has been achieved and where do we have to go?. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (01) 29-37.
• 7 Blaschke CM, Freddolino PP, Mullen EE. Ageing and Technology: A Review of the Research Literature. British Journal of Social Work 2009; 39 (04) 641-656.
• 8 European innovation partnership on active and healthy ageing - innovation union - European Commission (Internet, cited Jun 13, 2012). Available from. http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/index_en.cfm?section=active-healthy-ageing.
• 9 Whole Systems Demonstrators: an overview of telecare and telehealth (Internet). Department of Health, Richmond House, 79 Whitehall, London SW1A 2NJ, UK. [e-mail]. (Cited Jun 13, 2012). Available from http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsPolicyAndGuidance/DH_100946.
• 10 Henderson C, Knapp M, Fernández J-L, Beecham J, Hirani S, Beynon M. et al Cost-effectiveness of telehealth in people with social care needs: the Whole Systems Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. International Journal of Integrated Care. 2012.
• 11 Steventon a, Bardsley M, Billings J, Dixon J, Doll H, Hirani S. et al Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. Bmj 2012; 344: e3874-e3874.
• 12 Huch M. Bridging Research in Ageing and ICT Development - “D2: Identification and characterisation of the main stakeholder groups for “ICT for Ageing” solutions.”. 2010: 46
• 13 Bharucha AJ, Anand V, Forlizzi J, Dew MA, Reynolds CF, Stevens S. et al Intelligent Assistive Technology Applications to Dementia Care: Current Capabilities, Limitations, and Future Challenges. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 2009; 17 (02) 88-104.
• 14 Dawadi P, Cook D, Parsey C, Schmitter-Edgecombe M, Schneider M. An approach to cognitive assessment in smart home. Proceedings of the 2011 workshop on Data mining for medicine and healthcare. New York and NY and USA: ACM; 2011: 56-59.
• 15 Frenken Thomas; Steen E-E. BMNWHA. Motion Pattern Generation and Recognition for Mobility Assessments in Domestic Environments. Proceedings of the 1st International Living Usability Lab Workshop on AAL Latest Solutions, Trends and Applications. In conjunction with BIOSTEC 2011. 2011: 3-12.
• 16 Kleinberger T. An approach to and evaluations of assisted living systems using ambient intelligence for emergency monitoring and prevention. Universal access in human-computer interaction. 5th international conference, UAHCI 2009. Vol.2: Intelligent and ubiquitous interaction environments. 2009: 199-208.
• 17 Strese H, Seidel U, Knape T, Botthof A. Smart Home in Deutschland. Berlin: VDI/VDE-IT GmBH;
• 18 Chan M, Campo E, Estève D, Fourniols J-Y. Smart homes - Current features and future perspectives. Maturitas 2009; 64 (02) 90-97.
• 19 BRAID Project Bridging Research in Ageing and ICT Development (Internet, cited May 13, 2012). Available from. http://www.braidproject.eu/.
• 20 Cummings E, Nixon P. An Australian roadmap for ICT research and development for ageing? Lessons from a European Union initiative. Studies in health technology and informatics 2012; 178: 20-25.
• 21 Demiris G, Thompson H. Smart Homes and Ambient Assisted Living Applications: From Data to Knowledge-Empowering or Overwhelming Older Adults? Contribution of the IMIA Smart Homes and Ambiant Assisted Living Working Group. Yearbook of Medical Informatics 2011; 6 (01) 51-57.
• 22 Jimison H, Gorman P, Woods S, Nygren P, Walker M, Norris S. et al Barriers and drivers of health information technology use for the elderly, chronically ill, and underserved. Evidence report/technology assessment 2008; (175) 1-1422.
• 23 Morris MG, Venkatesch V. Age differences in technology adoption decisions: Implementation for a changing work force. Personnel Psychology 2000; 53 (02) 375-403.
• 24 Norgall T WR. Towards interoperability and integration of Personal Health AAL ecosystems. Stud Health Technol Inform 2012; 177: 272-282.
• 25 Antipolis S. ETSI Technical Report 130: Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); Interoperability and conformance testing - A classification scheme. Frankreich. 1994.
• 26 Eichelberg M. Interoperabilität von AAL-Systemkomponenten, Teil 1: Stand der Technik. Berlin: VDE-Verlag; 2010.
• 27 DIMDI - Medical Devices Law (Internet). DIMDI: German Institute of Medical Documentation and Information. (Cited Oct 11, 2012). Available from. http://www.dimdi.de/static/en/mpg/recht/index.htm.
• 28 European Parliament Counsil: Directive 2009/136/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council. 2009: 11-36.
• 29 Dalkey NC. Delphi. Santa Monica and CA: The RAND Corporation; 1967.
• 30 Häder M. Delphi-Befragungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften; 2009.
• 31 Oppenheim AN. Questionnaire Design, Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. Continuum. 2000: 312
• 32 Mayring P. Qualitative Content Analysis (28 paragraphs). Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2000; 1 (02) 10
• 33 Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 5th ed. Hartman S. editor New York: Allyn and Bacon; 2007: 980
• 34 Altman DG, Bland JM. Comparing several groups using analysis of variance. British Medical Journal. British Medical Journal Publishing Group 1996; 312 7044 1472-1473.
• 35 IBM SPSS Software für Predictive Analytics - Deutschland. IBM Corporation; 2012.
• 36 Project TL. LimeSurvey - the free and open source survey software tool (Internet). Carsten Schmitz. 2011. (cited Mar 7,2012). Available from http://www.limesurvey.org/de.
• 37 Holtmannspötter D, Rijkers-Defrasne S, Ploetz C, Thaller-Honold S, Zweck A. Technologieprognosen: Internationaler Vergleich 2010. Düsseldorf: VDI. 2010.
• 38 Meyrick J de. The Delphi method and health research. Health Education 2003; 103 (01) 7-16.
• 39 Iljaž RJ, Megliè M, švab I. Building consensus about eHealth in Slovene primary health care: Delphi study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making 2011; 11 (01) 25
• 40 Jaana M, Tamim H, Paré G, Teitelbaum M. Key IT management issues in hospitals: Results of a Delphi study in Canada. Int J Med Inform 2011; 80 (12) 828-840.
• 41 Hübner-Bloder G, Ammenwerth E. Key performance indicators to benchmark hospital information systems - a Delphi study. Methods Inf Med 2009; 48 (06) 508-518.
• 42 Leslie LL. Are high response rates essential to valid surveys?. Social Science Research 1972; 1 (03) 323-334.