Prevalence of hip dysplasia according to official radiographic screening, among 31 breeds of dogs in France

Summary

In order to determine the prevalence of hip dysplasia (HD) from radiographs that were submitted for authorative grading, and its changes over the time in 31 breeds of dogs in France, a 14-year retrospective study was conducted. Significant differences were observed between breeds, with HD prevalence ranging from 59.7% (Cane Corso) to 3.9% (Siberian Husky). When comparing the 1993–1999 with the 2000–2006 period in 15 breeds, a significant decrease in HD prevalence was detected in Berger Picard, Bernese Mountain dog, Briard, Gordon Setter, White Swiss Sheepdog and Rottweiler. Modifications observed in the other breeds were not statistically significant.

Keywords

Hip dysplasia - dog - radiographic screening

• References

• 1 Genevois J-P, Fau D, Brunon G. et al. Hip dysplasia : epidemiologic considerations based on the analysis of 9738 radiographs. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 2000; 151: 8-9 829-834.
• 2 Genevois J-P, Fau D, Carozzo C. et al. Depistage officiel de la dysplasie coxo-femorale: determination, au sein de 16 races canines en France, de la population faisant l‘objet d’un depistage radiographique systematique. Etude retrospective sur laperiode 1993-2002. Revue de Medecine Veterinaire 2005; 156: 299-310.
• 3 Fluckiger M, Friedrich GA, Binder H. A radiographic stress technique for evaluation of coxofemoraljoint laxity in dogs. Vet Surg 1999; 28: 1-9.
• 4 Swenson L, Audell L, Hedhammar A. Prevalence and inheritance of and selection for hip dysplasia in seven breeds of dogs in Sweden and benefit: cost analysis of a screening and control program. JAVMA 1997; 210: 215-221.
• 5 Leppanen M, Maki K, Juga J. et al. Factors affecting hip dysplasia in German Shepherd dogs in Finland: efficacy of the current improvement programme. J Small Anim Pract 2000; 41: 19-23.
• 6 Kaneene JB, Mostosky UV, Padgett GA. Retrospective cohort study of changes in hip joint phe- notypeofdogs in the United States. JAVMA 1997; 211: 1542-1544.
• 7 Paster ER, Lafond E, Biery DN. et al. Estimates of prevalence ofhip dysplasia in Golden Retrievers and Rottweilers and the influence of bias on published prevalence figures. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2005; 226: 387-392.
• 8 Smith GK. Advances in diagnosing canine hip dysplasia. J am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 1451-1457.
• 9 Leppanen Leppanen, Saloniemi H. Controlling canine hip dysplasia in Finland. Prev Vet Med 1999; 42: 121-131.
• 10 Linnmann SM. Die Huftgelenksdysplasie des Hundes. Paul Parey Edition; Berlin: 1998
• 11 Fluckiger M, Lang J, Binder H. et al. Die Bekamp- fung der Huftgelenkdysplasie in der Schweiz. Ein Ruckblick auf die vergangenen 24 Jahre. Schweiz ArchTierheilkd 1995; 137: 243-250.
• 12 Reed AL, Keller GG, Vogt DW. et al. Effectofdam and sire qualitative hip conformation scores on progeny hip conformation. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000; 217: 675-680.
• 13 Anonymous Trends in hip dysplasia (selected breeds). on http://www.offa.org Accessed on January 2 2007
• 14 Willis MB. A review of the progress in canine hip dysplasia control in Britain. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997; 210: 1480-1482.
• 15 Thompson R, Roe SC, Robertson ID. et al. Effects of pelvic positioning and simulated dorsal acet- abular rim remodeling on the radiographic shape of the dorsal acetabular edge. Vet Radiol Ultrasound 2007; 48: 8-13.
• 16 Genevois JP, Cachon T, Fau D. et al. Canine hip dysplasia radiographic screening : prevalence of rotation of the pevis along its length axis in 7012 conventional hip extended radiographs. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 296-298.
• 17 Malm S, Strandberg E, Danell B. et al. Impact of sedation on the diagnosis ofhip and elbow dysplasia in Swedish dogs. Prev Vet Med 2007; 78: 196-209.
• 18 Genevois JP, Chanoit G, Carozzo C. et al. Influence of anaesthesia on canine hip dysplasia score. JVet Med 2006; 53: 415-417.
• 19 Puerto DA, Smith GK, Gregor TP. et al. Relationships between results of the Ortolani methods of hip joint palpation and distraction index, Norberg angle, and hip score in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1999; 214: 497-501.
• 20 Smith GK, Biery DN, Gregor TP. New concepts of coxofemoral joint stability and the development of a clinical stress-radiographic method for quantitating hip joint laxity in the dog. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc 1990; 196: 59-70.
• 21 Smith GK, Gregor TP, Rhodes WH. et al. Coxofe- moral joint laxity from distraction radiography and its contemporaneous and prospective correlation withlaxity, subjective score, and evidence of degenerative joint disease from conventional hip-extended radiography in dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1021-1042.
• 22 Smith GK, Popovitch CA, Gregor TP. et al. Evaluation of risk factors for degenerativejoint disease associated with hip dysplasia in dogs. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1995; 206: 642-647.