Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2012; 25(04): 297-300
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-11-07-0098
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Goniometric measurements of the forelimb and hindlimb joints in sheep

V. M. Govoni
1   Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
,
S. C. Rahal
1   Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
,
F. S Agostinho
1   Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
,
R. T. Conceição
1   Department of Veterinary Surgery and Anesthesiology, School of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
,
M. H. Tsunemi
2   Institute of Biosciences, Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), Botucatu, SP, Brazil
,
A. O. El-Warrak
3   Department of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Canada
› Author AffiliationsThis study was supported by The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), and The National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq). We thank Guy Beauchamp for help with the statistical analysis.
Further Information

Publication History

Received 04 July 2011

Accepted 13 March 2012

Publication Date:
19 December 2017 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate angle-of-motion values for the forelimb and hindlimb in clinically healthy adult Santa Ines sheep by means of a standard goniometer.

Methods: Twenty female Santa Ines sheep, ranging in age between three- to six-yearsold, and weighing 32–45 kg (mean ± standard deviation [SD]: 30.4 ± 3.7) were used. A standard transparent plastic goniometer was used to measure passive maximum flexion, maximum extension, and range-of-motion (ROM) of the shoulder, elbow, carpal, hip, stifle, and tarsal joints in the right and left limbs. The goniometric measurements were done with the sheep awake and in a standing position. The measurements were made in triplicate by two independent investigators.

Results: In all evaluated joints, there was no significant difference either between the means of the two sides or between measurements performed by the two investigators. The mean ± SD values of the measurements (degrees) were as follows: 20 ± 1 (flexion), 170 ± 2 (extension), and 150 ± 2 (ROM) for the carpal joint; 34 ± 4 (flexion), 145 ± 6 (extension), and 110 ± 4 (ROM) for the elbow joint; 88 ± 2 (flexion), 144 ± 6 (extension), and 56 ± 5 (ROM) for shoulder joint; 35 ± 4 (flexion), 163 ± 3 (extension), and 129 ± 4 (ROM) for tarsal joint; 46 ± 4 (flexion), 146 ± 6 (extension), and 100 ± 4 (ROM) for the stifle joint; 54 ± 3 (flexion), 143 ± 7 (extension), and 89 ± 5 (ROM) for the hip joint.

Clinical significance: The data obtained provide useful and objective information on the joints. More studies are necessary using other sheep breeds.

Keywords

Sheep - angle - joint - goniometry
 

  • References

  • 1 Hesbach AL. Techniques for objective outcome assessment. Clin Tech Small Anim Pract 2007; 22: 146-154.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Knap K, Johnson AL, Schulz K. Fundamentals of physical rehabilitation. In: Fossum TW. editor. Small Animal Surgery. St Louis: Mosby; 2007. pg. 111-129.
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Gajdosik RL, Bohannon RW. Clinical measurement of range of motion: Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity. Phys Ther 1987; 67: 1867-1872.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Norkin CC, White DJ. Measurement of Joint Motion: a Guide to Goniometry. Philadelphia: FA Davis Company; 2003. pg. 404.
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Jaegger G, Marcellin-Little DJ, Levine D. Reliability of goniometry in Labrador Retrievers. Am J Vet Res 2002; 63: 979-986.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Cook JL, Renfro DC, Tomlinson JL. et al. Measurement of angles of abduction for diagnosis of shoulder instability in dogs using goniometry and digital image analysis. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 463-468.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Thomas TM, Marcellin-Little DJ, Roe SC. et al. Comparison of measurements obtained by use of an electrogoniometer and a universal plastic goniometer for the assessment of joint motion in dogs. Am J Vet Res 2006; 76: 1974-1979.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Araújo FAP, Rahal SC, Machado MRF. et al. Goniometry of the hind limbs of pacas (Cuniculus paca) raised in captivity. Pesq Vet Bras 2009; 29: 1004-1008.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Apelt D, Theiss F, El-Warrak AO. et al. In vivo behavior of three different injectable hydraulic calcium phosphate cements. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 1439-1451.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Hette K, Rahal SC, Volpi RS. et al. Radiographic measurement of tibial joint angles in sheep. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 204-209.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Meller R, Haasper C, Westhoff J. et al. An animal model to study ACL reconstruction during growth. Technol Health Care 2009; 17: 403-410.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Teixeira CR, Rahal SC, Volpi RS. et al. Tibial segmental bone defect treated with bone plate and cage filled with either xenogeneic composite or autologous cortical bone graft. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2007; 20: 269-276.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Hayes K, Walton JR, Szomor ZL. et al. Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion. Aust J Physiother 2001; 47: 289-294.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Rothstein JM, Miller PJ, Roettger RF. Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Elbow and knee measurements. Physical Ther 1983; 63: 1611-1615.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Soucie JM, Wang C, Forsyth A. et al. Range of motion measurements: reference values and a database for comparison studies. Haemophilia 2011; 17: 500-507.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Liljebrink Y, Bergh A. Goniometry: is it a reliable tool to monitor passive range of motion in horses?. Equine Vet J 2010; 42: 676-682.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar