Download PDF
Hamostaseologie 2012; 32(04): 249-257
DOI: 10.5482/ha-12050008
Review
Schattauer GmbH

Vitamin K antagonists

Ready to be replaced?Vitamin-K-AntagonistenKönnen sie ersetzt werden?
J. Steffel
1   CardioVascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, and Institute of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland
,
T. F. Luscher
1   CardioVascular Center, University Hospital Zurich, and Institute of Physiology, Cardiovascular Research, University of Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 22 May 2012

accepted: 28 August 2012

Publication Date:
28 December 2017 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

For the last decades, anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation (AF) as well as for the prophylaxis and long-term treatment of venous thromboembolism has been entirely based on vitamin K antagonists (VKA). Although very effective under optimal conditions, long-term treatment with these drugs is flawed by the fact that the time in the therapeutic range frequently is suboptimal due to biological factors, drug interactions and compliance.

The direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, as well as the direct FXa inhibitors rivaroxaban and apixaban provide more consistent anticoagulation and have proven their efficacy and safety against VKAs in several large scale randomized clinical trials for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation as well as for the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism. In view of these convincing data and other advantages such as the lack of mandatory monitoring and only few drug interactions,VKAs will most likely be replaced in a majority of patients for these indications. Based on the most recent trial evidence, the current review discusses the role of VKA treatmentand that of the novel anticoagulants.

Zusammenfassung

Während der vergangenen Jahrzehnte kamen zur Schlaganfallprophylaxe bei Vorhofflimmern sowie zur Behandlung der venösen Thromboembolie in erster Linie Vitamin-KAntagonisten zum Einsatz. Obgleich diese unter optimalen Bedingungen sehr effektiv und verhältnismäßig sicher sind, wird ihre Langzeitanwendung durch häufige Quickbzw. INR-Schwankungen bedingt durch die zahlreichen Medikamenten- und Arzneimittelnebenwirkungen sowie Complianceproblematik beeinträchtigt.

Der direkte Thrombinhemmer Dabigatran sowie die Faktor-Xa-Inhibitoren Rivaroxaban und Apixaban bewirken eine verlässlichere Blutverdünnung, und haben verglichen mit den Vitamin-K-Antagonisten in großen klinischen Studien sowohl beim Vorhofflimmern als auch in der Behandlung der venösen Thromboembolie eine bessere Effizienz und Sicherheit gezeigt. In Anbetracht der überzeugenden Datenlage sowie weiterer Vorteile wie fehlender Notwendigkeit eines Monitorings und selteneren Medikamenteninteraktionen ist davon auszugehen, dass Vitamin-K-Antagonisten wohl in der Mehrzahl der Fälle durch die neuen Antikoagulanzien ersetzt werden. In diesem Review wird, basierend auf den Ergebnissen der Studien, die Rolle der Vitamin-K-Antagonisten und der neuen Antikoagulanzien diskutiert.

Keywords

Apixaban - atrial fibrillation - dabigatran - ovel oral anticoagulants - rivaroxaban - RE-LY - AVERROES - ARISTOTLE - ROCKET AF

Schlüsselwörter

Apixaban - Vorhofflimmern - dabigatran - neue orale Antikoagulanzien - Rivaroxaban - RE-LY - AVERROES - ARISTOTLE - ROCKET AF
 

  • References

  • 1 Steffel J, Luscher TF, Tanner FC. Tissue factor in cardiovascular diseases: molecular mechanisms and clinical implications. Circulation 2006; 113: 722-731.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Schenone M, Furie BC, Furie B. The blood coagulation cascade. Curr Opin Hematol 2004; 11: 272-277.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Steffel J, Braunwald E. Novel oral anticoagulants: focus on stroke prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. Eur Heart J 2011; 32: 1968-1976.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Ansell J, Hirsh J, Poller L. et al. The pharmacology and management of the vitamin K antagonists: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy. Chest 2004; 126 (03) Suppl 204S-233S.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Hart RG, Pearce LA, Aguilar MI. Meta-analysis: antithrombotic therapy to prevent stroke in patients who have nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Ann Intern Med 2007; 146: 857-867.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Hirsh J, Guyatt G, Albers GW. et al. Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines. 8th ed. Chest. 2008. 133 (6 Suppl): 110S-112S.
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Camm AJ, Kirchhof P, Lip GY. et al. Guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation: the Task Force for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Europace 2010; 12: 1360-1420.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Steffel J, Luscher TF. Novel anticoagulants in clinical development: focus on factor Xa and direct thrombin inhibitors. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 2009; 10: 616-623.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Steffel J, Beer JH. Anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation. Kardiovaskuläre Medizin 2007; 10: 168-173.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Holbrook AM, Pereira JA, Labiris R. et al. Systematic overview of warfarin and its drug and food interactions. Arch Intern Med 2005; 165: 1095-1106.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wittkowsky AK. Warfarin and other coumarin derivatives: pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and drug interactions. Semin Vasc Med 2003; 03: 221-230.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 O’Reilly RA. Warfarin metabolism and drug-drug interactions. Adv Exp Med Biol 1987; 214: 205-212.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Stangier J, Rathgen K, Stahle H. et al. The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2007; 64: 292-303.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Stangier J. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the oral direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran etexilate. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47: 285-295.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Perzborn E, Strassburger J, Wilmen A. et al. In vitro and in vivo studies of the novel antithrombotic agent BAY 59-7939--an oral, direct Factor Xa inhibitor. J Thromb Haemost 2005; 03: 514-521.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Perzborn E, Roehrig S, Straub A. et al. Rivaroxaban: a new oral factor Xa inhibitor. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 2010; 30: 376-381.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Wong PC, Crain EJ, Xin B. et al. Apixaban, an oral, direct and highly selective factor Xa inhibitor: in vitro, antithrombotic and antihemostatic studies. J Thromb Haemost 2008; 06: 820-829.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Jiang X, Crain EJ, Luettgen JM. et al. Apixaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, inhibits human clotbound factor Xa activity in vitro. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 780-782.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Raghavan N, Frost CE, Yu Z. et al. Apixaban metabolism and pharmacokinetics after oral administration to humans. Drug Metab Dispos 2009; 37: 74-81.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1139-1151.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD, Yusuf S. et al. Newly identified events in the RE-LY trial. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1875-1876.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Oldgren J. American College of Cardiology Meeting. 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Diener HC, Connolly SJ, Ezekowitz MD. et al. Dabigatran compared with warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous transient ischaemic attack or stroke: a subgroup analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet Neurol 2010; 09: 1157-1163.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nagarakanti R, Ezekowitz MD, Oldgren J. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation: An analysis of patients undergoing cardioversion. Circulation 2011; 123: 131-136.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Wallentin L, Yusuf S, Ezekowitz MD. et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran compared with warfarin at different levels of international normalised ratio control for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the RE-LY trial. Lancet 2010; 376: 975-983.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Patel MR, Mahaffey KW, Garg J. et al. Rivaroxaban versus warfarin in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 883-891.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Mahaffey KW. American Heart Association Meeting. 2010
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Connolly SJ, Eikelboom J, Joyner C. et al. Apixaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2010; 364: 806-817.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Granger CB, Alexander JH, McMurray JJ. et al. Apixaban versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 981-992.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Oral dabigatran etexilate vs. subcutaneous enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total knee replacement: the RE-MODEL randomized trial. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 05: 2178-2185.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Dabigatran etexilate versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip replacement: a randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Lancet 2007; 370 (9591): 949-956.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Friedman RJ, Dahl OE, Rosencher N. et al. Dabigatran versus enoxaparin for prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty: A pooled analysis of three trials. Thromb Res 2010; 126: 175-182.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Eriksson BI, Dahl OE, Huo MH. et al. Oral dabigatran versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after primary total hip arthroplasty (RE-NOVATE II). A randomised, double-blind, non-inferiority trial. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 721-729.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK. et al. Dabigatran versus warfarin in the treatment of acute venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 2342-2352.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Eriksson BI, Borris LC, Friedman RJ. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after hip arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2765-2775.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Lassen MR, Ageno W, Borris LC. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty. N Engl J Med 2008; 358: 2776-2786.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Davidson BL. et al. Rivaroxaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after total knee arthroplasty (RECORD4): a randomised trial. Lancet 2009; 373: 1673-1680.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Kakkar AK, Brenner B, Dahl OE. et al. Extended duration rivaroxaban versus short-term enoxaparin for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after total hip arthroplasty: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2008; 372: 31-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Turpie AG, Lassen MR, Eriksson BI. et al. Rivaroxaban for the prevention of venous thromboembolism after hip or knee arthroplasty. Pooled analysis of four studies. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 444-453.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 The EINSTEIN Investigators. Oral Rivaroxaban for Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 2499-2510.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Van Ryn J, Stangier J, Haertter S. et al. Dabigatran etexilate--a novel, reversible, oral direct thrombin inhibitor: interpretation of coagulation assays and reversal of anticoagulant activity. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 1116-1127.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Asmis LM, Alberio L, Angelillo-Scherrer A. et al. Rivaroxaban: Quantification by anti-FXa assay and influence on coagulation tests A study in 9 Swiss laboratories. Thromb Res 2011; 129: 492-498.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Freyburger G, Macouillard G, Labrouche S. et al. Coagulation parameters in patients receiving dabigatran etexilate or rivaroxaban: two observational studies in patients undergoing total hip or total knee replacement. Thromb Res 2011; 127: 457-465.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Barrett YC, Wang Z, Frost C. et al. Clinical laboratory measurement of direct factor Xa inhibitors: AntiXa assay is preferable to prothrombin time assay. Thromb Haemost 2010; 104: 1263-1271.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Gladstone DJ, Bui E, Fang J. et al. Potentially preventable strokes in high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation who are not adequately anticoagulated. Stroke 2009; 40: 235-240.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Alexander JH, Lopes RD, James S. et al. Apixaban with antiplatelet therapy after acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 699-708.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Mega JL, Braunwald E, Wiviott SD. et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2011; 366: 9-19.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar