Hamostaseologie 2016; 36(01): 33-43
DOI: 10.5482/hamo-14-10-0048
Review
Schattauer GmbH

Why we should not skip aspirin in cardiovascular prevention

K. Schrör
1   Institut für Pharmakologie und Klinische Pharmakologie, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

received: 29 January 2015

Accepted after major revision: 06 March 2015

Publication Date:
09 February 2018 (online)

Summary

Since more than 20 years, aspirin is an approved and established first-line antiplatelet medication in cardiovascular prevention. This is partially due to ist unique mode of action which is not shared with any other antiplatelet agent as well by the reliability of its pharmacological efficacy: inhibition of platelet COX-1 and subsequent thromboxane formation in almost every patient. Aspirin acts synergistic with ADP-antagonists in dual antiplatelet therapy of acute coronary syndroms (ACS) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) and is also approved for long-term secondary prevention. Patients with atrial fibrillation are an exception and benefit more from anticoagulants. After the introduction of the new oral anticoagulants (NOACs), i.e. direct inhibitors of factor Xa or thrombin formation, there is a renewed discussion about the role of antiplatelet agents, specifically if additional dual antiplatelet treatment is still necessary for an optimum clinical effect or whether one component, such as aspirin might be skipped in favor of other classes of oral antiplatelet agents, such as ADP-antagonists. The available data are insufficient to recommend this because of a low number of studies and a still uncertain benefit/ risk (bleeding) ratio. More research on aspirin as a chemopreventive appears also to be necessary and is going on, in particular in individuals at high-risk for vascular thrombotic diseases (diabetics, preeclampsia, venous thrombembolism).

Zusammenfassung

Acetylsalizylsäure (ASS) ist seit über 20 Jahren zugelassene und bewährte Antiplättchenmedikation zur kardiovaskulären Prävention. Dies beruht pharmakologisch auf dem besonderen Wirkmechanismus, den keine andere Antiplättchensubstanz aufweist: Hemmung der Plättchen-COX-1 und der nachfolgenden Thromboxansynthese bei fast jedem Patienten. ASS wirkt synergistisch mit ADP-Rezeptorantagonisten in der dualen Antiplättchentherapie des akuten Koronarsyndroms (ACS) sowie bei perkutanen Koronarinterventionen (PCI) und ist Langzeitmedikation der ersten Wahl in der Sekundärprävention der Atherothrombose. Patienten mit Vorhofflimmern sind eine Besonderheit und profitieren mehr von einer Antikoagulation. Nach Einführung der neuen oralen Antikoagulantien (NOACs), direkten Inhibitoren von Faktor Xa oder Thrombin, wurde diskutiert, ob nicht auf eine zusätzliche duale Antiplättchentherapie verzichtet werden kann und eventuell eine Anti-plättchensubstanz, genügt, d. h., ob z. B. ASS durch einen ADP-Antagonisten ersetzt werden kann. Die vorhandenen Daten sind unzureichend und erlauben zurzeit keine klare Aussage über das Nutzen/Risikoverhältnis, insbesondere das Blutungsrisiko. Mehr Forschung zu ASS ist erforderlich und erfolgt in mehreren Studien und Patientenpopulationen. Dazu gehören insbesondere Personen mit einem erhöhten Risiko für Gefäßthrombosen (Diabetes mellitus, Präeklampsie, idiopathische venöse Thromboembolie).

 
  • References

  • 1 ISIS-2.. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1988; 2: 349-360.
  • 2 US-PHS.. Findings from the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. N Engl J Med 1988; 318: 262-264.
  • 3 US-PHS.. Final report on the aspirin component of the ongoing Physicians’ Health Study. Steering Committee of the Physicians’ Health Study Research Group. N Engl J Med 1989; 321: 129-135.
  • 4 Antithrombotic Trialists (ATT) collaboration, B., C, Blackwell L. et al. Aspirin in the primary and secondary prevention of vascular disease: collaborative meta-analysis of individual participant data from randomized trials. Lancet 2009; 373: 1849-1860.
  • 5 Gaglia Jr MA, Clavijo L. Cardiovascular pharmacology core reviews: aspirin. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther 2013; 18: 505-513.
  • 6 Dauerman HL. Reconsidering the necessity of aspirin in stable coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 1437-1440.
  • 7 Yusuf S. et al. Effects of clopidogrel in addition to aspirin in patients with acute coronary syndromes without ST-segment elevation. N Engl J Med 2001; 345: 494-502.
  • 8 Simes J. et al. Aspirin for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism: The INSPIRE Collaboration. Circulation 2014; 130: 1062-1071.
  • 9 Mehta SR. et al. Dose comparisons of clopidogrel and aspirin in acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 930-942.
  • 10 Wiviott SD. et al. Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2007; 357: 2001-2015.
  • 11 Wallentin L. et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 1045-1057.
  • 12 Wright IS. Present status of anticoagulant therapy in the treatment of myocardial infarction; the use and misuse of anticoagulants; an evaluation of new anticoagulants, their indications and dosage. Ann Intern Med 1955; 43: 942-954.
  • 13 Rothberg MB. et al. Warfarin plus aspirin after myocardial infarction or the acute coronary syndrome: meta-analysis with estimates of risk and benefit. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143: 241-250.
  • 14 TPT.. Thrombosis prevention trial: randomised trial of low-intensity oral anticoagulation with warfarin and low-dose aspirin in the primary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in men at increased risk. The Medical Research Council’s General Practice Research Framework. Lancet 1998; 351: 233-241.
  • 15 Geisler T. et al. Impact of antithrombotic treatment on short-term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention for left main disease: a pooled analysis from REPLACE-2, ACUITY, and HORIZONS-AMI trials. EuroIntervention 2014; 10: 97-104.
  • 16 Dewilde WJM, Oirbans T, Verheugt FWA. Use of clopidogrel with or without aspirin in patients taking oral anticoagulant therapy and undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an open-label, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet 2013; 381: 1107-1115.
  • 17 Zhou G. et al. Aspirin hydrolysis in plasma is a variable function of butyrylcholinesterase and platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase 1b2 (PAFAH1b2). J Biol Chem 2013; 288: 11940-11948.
  • 18 Zhou Y, Boudreau DM, Freedman AN. Trends in the use of aspirin and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in the general U.S. population. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2013; 23: 43-50.
  • 19 Nagelschmitz J, Blunk M, Krätschmar J. et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of acetylsalicylic acid after intravenous and oral administration to healthy volunteers. Clin Pharmacol:Adv Applic 2013; 5: 1-9.
  • 20 Siller-Matula JM. et al. Response variability to P2Y12 receptor inhibitors: expectations and reality. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2013; 6: 1111-1128.
  • 21 Kovacs EG. et al. New direct and indirect methods for the detection of cyclooxygenase 1 acetylation by aspirin; the lack of aspirin resistance among healthy individuals. Thromb Res 2013; 131: 320-324.
  • 22 Morris T. et al. Effects of low-dose aspirin on acute inflammatory responses in humans. J Immunol 2009; 183: 2089-2096.
  • 23 Ikonomidis I. et al. Increased proinflammatory cytokines in patients with chronic stable angina and their reduction by aspirin. Circulation 1999; 100: 793-798.
  • 24 Kennon S. et al. The effect of aspirin on C-reactive protein as a marker of risk in unstable angina. J Am Coll Cardiol 2001; 37: 1266-1270.
  • 25 Ridker PM. et al. Inflammation, aspirin, and the risk of cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy men. N Engl J Med 1997; 336: 973-979.
  • 26 Ridker PM. et al. Prospective study of C-reactive protein and the risk of future cardiovascular events among apparently healthy women. Circulation 1998; 98: 731-733.
  • 27 Muhlestein JB. Effect of antiplatelet therapy on inflammatory markers in atherothrombotic patients. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 71-82.
  • 28 Ulrych T. et al. Release of sphingosine-1-phosphate from human platelets is dependent on thromboxane formation. J Thromb Haemost 2011; 9: 790-798.
  • 29 Polzin A. et al. Aspirin inhibits release of platelet-derived sphingosine-1-phosphate in acute myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 2013; 170: e23-e24.
  • 30 Passacquale G, Ferro A. Current concepts of platelet activation: possibilities for therapeutic modulation of heterotypic vs. homotypic aggregation. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2011; 72: 604-618.
  • 31 Weyrich AS, Lindemann S, Zimmerman GA. The evolving role of platelets in inflammation. J Thromb Haemost 2003; 1: 1897-1905.
  • 32 Hennekens CH. et al. Terms and conditions: semantic complexity and aspirin resistance. Circulation 2004; 110: 1706-1708.
  • 33 Schrör K, Huber K, Hohlfeld T. Functional testing methods for the antiplatelet effects of aspirin. Biomark Med 2011; 5: 31-42.
  • 34 Cattaneo M. Letter by cattaneo regarding article, “incomplete inhibition of thromboxane biosynthesis by acetylsalicylic Acid: determinants and effect on cardiovascular risk”. Circulation 2009; 119: e594.
  • 35 Frelinger AL 3rd . et al. Residual arachidonic acid-induced platelet activation via an adenosine diphosphate-dependent but cyclooxygenase-1– and cyclooxygenase-2-independent pathway: a 700-patient study of aspirin resistance. Circulation 2006; 113: 2888-2896.
  • 36 Frelinger AL 3rd . et al. Association of cyclooxygenase-1-dependent andindependent platelet function assays with adverse clinical outcomes in aspirin-treated patients presenting for cardiac catheterization. Circulation 2009; 120: 2586-2596.
  • 37 Reny JL. et al. Antiplatelet drug response status does not predict recurrent ischemic events in stable cardiovascular patients: results of the Anti-platelet Drug Resistances and Ischemic Events study. Circulation 2012; 125: 3201-3210.
  • 38 Stone GW. et al. Platelet reactivity and clinical outcomes after coronary artery implantation of drug-eluting stents (ADAPT-DES): a prospective multi-centre registry study. Lancet 2013; 382: 614-623.
  • 39 Mayer K. et al. Aspirin Treatment and Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Results of the ISAR-ASPI Registry. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014; 64: 863-871.
  • 40 Brummel KE. et al. Thrombin functions during tissue factor-induced blood coagulation. Blood 2002; 100: 148-152.
  • 41 Steinberg SF. The cardiovascular actions of pro-tease-activated receptors. Mol Pharmacol 2005; 67: 2-11.
  • 42 Alexander KS, Fried MG, Farrell DH. Role of electrostatic interactions in binding of thrombin to the fibrinogen gamma’ chain. Biochemistry 2012; 51: 3445-5340.
  • 43 Szczeklik A. et al. Antiplatelet drugs and generation of thrombin in clotting blood. Blood 1992; 80: 2006-2011.
  • 44 Kessels H. et al. Measurement of thrombin generation in whole blood--the effect of heparin and aspirin. Thromb Haemost 1994; 72: 78-83.
  • 45 Undas A, Brummel-Ziedins KE, Mann KG. Anti-thrombotic properties of aspirin and resistance to aspirin: beyond strictly antiplatelet actions. Blood 2007; 109: 2285-2292.
  • 46 Wolzt M. et al. Open-label, randomized study of the effect of rivaroxaban with or without acetylsalicylic acid on thrombus formation in a perfusion chamber. Thromb Res 2013; 132: 240-247.
  • 47 Gurbel PA. et al. Delayed thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot generation by clopidogrel: a new dose-related effect demonstrated by thrombelastography in patients undergoing coronary artery stenting. Thromb Res 2007; 119: 563-570.
  • 48 Undas A. et al. Lack of aspirin-induced decrease in thrombin formation in subjects resistant to aspirin. Thromb Haemost 2007; 97: 1056-1058.
  • 49 Yasu T. et al. Effects of aspirin DL-lysine on thrombin generation in unstable angina pectoris. Am J Cardiol 1993; 71: 1164-1168.
  • 50 Parodi G. et al. Comparison of prasugrel and ticagrelor loading doses in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients: RAPID (Rapid Activity of Platelet Inhibitor Drugs) primary PCI study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013; 61: 1601-1606.
  • 51 Alexopoulos D. et al. Randomized assessment of ticagrelor versus prasugrel antiplatelet effects in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Interv 2012; 5: 797-804.
  • 52 Valgimigli M. et al. Randomized, double-blind comparison of effects of abiciximab bolus only vs. on-label regimen on ex vivo inhibition of platelet aggregation in responders to clopidogrel undergoing coronary stenting. J Thromb Haemost 2010; 8: 1903-1911.
  • 53 Schlitt A. et al. Antiplatelet therapy and anticoagulants. Lancet 2013; 382: 24-25.
  • 54 Oldgren J. et al. New oral anticoagulants in addition to single or dual antiplatelet therapy after an acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2013; 34: 1670-1680.
  • 55 Mega JL. et al. Rivaroxaban in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2012; 366: 9-19.
  • 56 Weitz JI. Insights into the role of thrombin in the pathogenesis of recurrent ischaemia after acute coronary syndrome. Thromb Haemost 2014; 112: 924-931.
  • 57 Lanas A. et al. Low doses of acetylsalicylic acid increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in a meta-analysis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2011; 9: 762-768.
  • 58 Cea Soriano L. et al. Cardiovascular and upper gastrointestinal bleeding consequences of low-dose acetylsalicylic acid discontinuation. Thromb Hae-most 2013; 110: 1298-1304.
  • 59 Rothwell PM. et al. Short-term effects of daily aspirin on cancer incidence, mortality, and non-vascular death: analysis of the time course of risks and benefits in 51 randomised controlled trials. Lancet 2012; 379: 1602-1612.
  • 60 ATT.. Collaborative meta-analysis of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy for prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke in high risk patients. BMJ 2002; 324: 71-86.
  • 61 CAPRIE.. A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events. CAPRIE Steering Committee. Lancet 1996; 348: 1329-1339.
  • 62 Biondi-Zoccai GG. et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the hazards of discontinuing or not adhering to aspirin among 50,279 patients at risk for coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J 2006; 27: 2667-2674.
  • 63 Sung JJ. et al. Continuation of low-dose aspirin therapy in peptic ulcer bleeding: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010; 152: 1-9.
  • 64 Bhatt DL. et al. Clopidogrel and aspirin versus aspirin alone for the prevention of atherothrombotic events. N Engl J Med 2006; 354: 1706-1717.
  • 65 Swaim L, Hillman RS. Aspirin administered to women at 100 mg every other day produces less platelet inhibition than aspirin administered at 81 mg per day: implications for interpreting the women’s health study. J Thromb Thrombolysis 2009; 28: 94-100.
  • 66 Belch J. et al. The prevention of progression of arterial disease and diabetes (POPADAD) trial: factorial randomised placebo controlled trial of aspirin and antioxidants in patients with diabetes and asymptomatic peripheral arterial disease. BMJ 2008; 337: a1840.
  • 67 Di Minno MN. et al. Aspirin resistance, platelet turnover, and diabetic angiopathy: a 2011 update. Thromb Res 2011; 129: 341-344.
  • 68 DiChiara J. et al. The effect of aspirin dosing on platelet function in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: an analysis from the aspirin-induced platelet effect (ASPECT) study. Diabetes 2007; 56: 3014-3019.
  • 69 Pulcinelli FM. et al. COX-1 sensitivity and thromboxane A2 production in type 1 and type 2 diabetic patients under chronic aspirin treatment. Eur Heart J 2009; 30: 1279-1286.
  • 70 DiMinno G. et al. Trial of repeated low-dose aspirin in diabetic angiopathy. Blood 1986; 68: 886-891.
  • 71 Gurbel PA. et al. Evaluation of dose-related effects of aspirin on platelet function: results from the Aspirin-Induced Platelet Effect (ASPECT) study. Circulation 2007; 115: 3156-3164.
  • 72 Addad F. et al. Antiplatelet effect of once- or twice-daily aspirin dosage in stable coronary artery disease patients with diabetes. Int J Hematol 2010; 92: 296-301.
  • 73 Dillinger JG. et al. Biological efficacy of twice daily aspirin in type 2 diabetic patients with coronary artery disease. Am Heart J 2012; 164: 600-606.
  • 74 Henry P. et al. 24-hour time-dependent aspirin efficacy in patients with stable coronary artery disease. Thromb Haemost 2011; 105: 336-344.
  • 75 Anderson DR. et al. Aspirin versus low-molecular-weight heparin for extended venous thromboembolism prophylaxis after total hip arthroplasty: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2013; 158: 800-806.
  • 76 Schrör K. Aspirin and venous thromboses. Inter-nist (Berl) 2015; 56: 84-90.
  • 77 Henderson JT. et al. Low-dose aspirin for prevention of morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia: a systematic evidence review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2014; 160: 695-703.
  • 78 Chan AT. et al. Aspirin in the chemoprevention of colorectal neoplasia: an overview. Cancer Prev Res 2011; 5: 164-178.
  • 79 Schrör K, Rauch B. Aspirin in primary and secondary prevention of colorectal carcinomas. Med Monatsschr Pharm 2014; 36: 411-421.
  • 80 Bonaca MP. et al. Long-term use of ticagrelor in patients with prior myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2015 DOI: 10.19056/NEJMoal500857