Hay fever & homeopathy: a case series evaluation

Background: Seasonal allergic rhinitis (hay fever) is common and can considerably reduce the quality of life of sufferers. Despite the wide everyday application and promising results with homeopathy, scientific evidence of its effectiveness for most ailments is scarce.

Aim: The assessment of the clinical effectiveness of homeopathic remedies in the alleviation of hay fever symptoms in a typical clinical setting.

Methods: We performed a clinical observational study of eight patients in the treatment of hay fever symptoms over a two-year period (2012 and 2013) using Measure Yourself Medical Outcome Profile (MYMOP) self-evaluation questionnaires at baseline and again after two weeks and four weeks of homeopathic treatment. The individualized prescription – either a single remedy or multiple remedies – was based on the totality of each patient's symptoms.

Results: The average MYMOP scores for the eyes, nose, activity and wellbeing had improved significantly after two and four weeks of homeopathic treatment. The overall average MYMOP profile score at baseline was 3.83 (standard deviation, SD, 0.78). After 14 and 28 days of treatment the average score had fallen to 1.14 (SD, 0.36; P < 0.001) and 1.06 (SD, 0.25; P < 0.001) respectively.

Conclusions: Individualized homeopathic treatment was associated with significant alleviation of hay fever symptoms, enabling the reduction in use of conventional treatment. The results presented in this study can be considered as a step towards a pilot pragmatic study that would use more robust outcome measures and include a larger number of patients prescribed a single or a multiple homeopathic prescription on an individualized basis.

Keywords

Hay fever - Homeopathy - MYMOP questionnaires

• References

• 1 Hammersley V.S., Walker S., Elton R., Sheikh A. Protocol for the adolescent hayfever trial: cluster randomised controlled trial of an educational intervention for healthcare professionals for the management of school-age children with hayfever. Trials 2010; 11: 84.
• 2 NHS Choices. Hay fever facts – live well. 2014. [Accessed 14 July 2015].
• 3 Schapowal A. Petasites Study Group Randomised controlled trial of butterbur and cetirizine for treating seasonal allergic rhinitis. BMJ 2002; 324: 144-146.
• 4 Cunha J.P. Side effects of Nasonex (Mometasone Furoate (nasal spray)) drug center. RxList. 2015. [Accessed 23 June 2015].
• 5 Durham S.R., Yang W.H., Pedersen M.R., Johansen N., Rak S. Sublingual immunotherapy with once-daily grass allergen tablets: a randomized controlled trial in seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 117: 802-809.
• 6 Buckingham S, Mardon J. Allergy: a modern epidemic, British Homeopathic Association. <http://www.britishhomeopathic.org/bha-charity/how-we-can-help/conditions-a-z/allergy-a-modern-epidemic-2/ > [Accessed 23 June 2015].
• 7 Watson I. A guide to the methodologies of homeopathy. 2004. Cutting Edge Publications; Cumbria.:
• 8 Goossens M., Laekeman G., Aertgeerts B. et al Evaluation of the quality of life after individualized homeopathic treatment for seasonal allergic rhinitis. A prospective, open, non-comparative study. Homeopathy 2009; 98: 11-16.
• 9 Reilly D., Taylor M.A., Beattie N.G.M. et al Is evidence for homoeopathy reproducible?. Lancet 1994; 344: 1601-1606.
• 10 Banerjee K., Costelloe C., Mathie R.T., Howick J. Homeopathy for allergic rhinitis: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev 2014; 3: 59.
• 11 Herbert A.R. The principles and art of cure by homoeopathy. 2006. B. Jain Publications; New Delhi.:
• 12 Taylor M.A., Reilly D., Llewellyn-Jones R.H., McSharry C., Aitchison T.C. Randomised controlled trial of homoeopathy versus placebo in perennial allergic rhinitis with overview of four trial series commentary: larger trials are needed. BMJ 2000; 321: 471-476.
• 13 Lüdtke R., Wiesenauer M. A meta-analysis of homeopathic treatment of pollinosis with Galphimia glauca . Wien Med Wochenschr 1997; 147: 323-327.
• 14 Wiesenauer M., Heidl R. New approaches to treating pollenosis – a pilot study. Complement Ther Med 1999; 7: 222-224.
• 15 University of Bristol. General information. <http://www.bris.ac.uk/primaryhealthcare/resources/mymop/general-information/ [Accessed 20 Oct 2015].
• 16 Paterson C. Measuring outcomes in primary care: a patient-generated measure, MYMOP, compared with the SF-36 health survey. BMJ 1996; 312: 1016-1020.
• 17 Relton C., Weatherley-Jones E. Homeopathy service in a National Health Service community menopause clinic: audit of clinical outcomes. J Br Menopause Soc 2005; 11: 72-73.
• 18 Meteorological Office. Pollen forecast. <http://www.metoffice.gov.uk/health/public/pollen-forecast [Accessed 1 Dec 2015].
• 19 Ernst E. A systematic review of systematic reviews of homeopathy. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2002; 54: 577-582.