Int J Sports Med 2022; 43(05): 434-443
DOI: 10.1055/a-1648-4653
Training & Testing

Interval Training with Different Intensities in Overweight/Obese Adolescent Females

Wissal Abassi
1   University of Jendouba, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, UR13JS01, 7100 Kef, Tunisia
2   University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Rabta Hospital, LR99ES11, 1007 Tunis, Tunisia
3   Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of “La Manouba”, Manouba 2010, Tunisia
,
1   University of Jendouba, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, UR13JS01, 7100 Kef, Tunisia
2   University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Rabta Hospital, LR99ES11, 1007 Tunis, Tunisia
,
4   School of Health and Caring Sciences, University of West Attica, Athens, Greece
,
Lee Hill
5   Division of Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
,
Ghazi Racil
3   Higher Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Ksar Said, University of “La Manouba”, Manouba 2010, Tunisia
,
6   Medbase St. Gallen Am Vadianplatz, St. Gallen, Switzerland
7   Institute of Primary Care, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
2   University of Tunis El Manar, Faculty of Medicine of Tunis, Rabta Hospital, LR99ES11, 1007 Tunis, Tunisia
,
Anissa Bouassida
1   University of Jendouba, High Institute of Sport and Physical Education of Kef, UR13JS01, 7100 Kef, Tunisia
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

To compare the effects of 12 weeks of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) versus moderate-intensity interval training (MIIT) on hematological and inflammatory markers in youth females, 38 overweight/obese females (16.4±1.0 yrs.) were randomly assigned to HIIT (2×6–8 repetitions of 30 s at 100–110% maximal aerobic speed (MAS), with 30 s active recovery between repetitions at 50% MAS; n=13), MIIT (2×6–8 repetitions of 30 s at 70–80% MAS, with 30 s active recovery between repetitions at 50% MAS; n=13), and a control group (CG, no intervention; n=12). Body composition, blood pressure, maximal heart rate, hematological and inflammatory markers (C-reactive protein [CRP], and erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) markers were assessed in all groups before and following the training program. Results revealed a significant (P<0.05) interaction effect for body composition, systolic blood pressure (SBP), MAS, maximal heart rate, and CRP. Within-group analyses for the HIIT and MIIT groups showed significant improvements in body mass (P=0.009 and P=0.025, respectively), BMI Z-score (P=0.011 and P=0.028, respectively), and MAS (P<0.001 and P=0.011, respectively). The HIIT program showed a significant decrease in body fat (P=0.002), waist circumference (P=0.002), maximal heart rate (P=0.003), SBP (P=0.001), and plasma CRP (P=0.004). In both groups, no significant changes were observed in ESR and hematological markers after intervention. No variable changed in CG. HIIT was the effective method to manage cardiometabolic health and inflammatory disorders in obese youth.



Publication History

Received: 21 October 2020

Accepted: 08 September 2021

Article published online:
08 November 2021

© 2021. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany