Simpson's Grading Scale for WHO Grade I Meningioma Resection in the Modern Neurosurgical Era: Are We Really Asking the Right Question?

Abstract

The Simpson grading scale for the classification of the extent of meningioma resection provided a tremendous movement forward in 1957 suggesting increasing the extent of resection improves recurrence rates. However, equal, if not greater, movements forward have been made in the neurosurgical community over the last half a century owing to improvements in neuroimaging capabilities, microsurgical techniques, and radiotherapeutic strategies. Sughrue et al proposed the idea that these advancements have altered what a “recurrence” and “subtotal resection” truly means in modern neurosurgery compared with Simpson's era, and that a mandated use of the Simpson Scale is likely less clinically relevant today. A subsequent period of debate ensued in the literature which sought to re-examine the clinical value of using the Simpson Scale in modern neurosurgery. While a large body of evidence has recently been provided, these data generally continue to support the clinical importance of gross tumor resection as well as the value of adjuvant radiation therapy and the importance of recently updated World Health Organization classifications. However, there remains a negligible interval benefit in performing overly aggressive surgery and heroic maneuvers to remove the last bit of tumor, dura, and/or bone just for the simple act of achieving a lower Simpson score. Ultimately, meningioma surgery may be better contextualized as a continuous set of weighted risk–benefit decisions throughout the entire operation.

Keywords

Simpson Scale - meningiomas - recurrence - neuroimaging - subtotal resection - neurosurgery - gross total resection

Authors' Contributions

Conceptualization, M.E.S.; methodology, M.E.S and N.D.; formal analysis, N.D.; writing—original draft preparation, M.E.S and N.D.; writing—review and editing, M.E.S and N.D.; visualization, N.D.; supervision, M.E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Publication History

Received: 05 October 2022

Accepted: 21 January 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
29 January 2023

Article published online:
22 February 2023

• References

• 1 Sughrue ME, Kane AJ, Shangari G. et al. The relevance of Simpson Grade I and II resection in modern neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2010; 113 (05) 1029-1035
• 2 Simpson D. The recurrence of intracranial meningiomas after surgical treatment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1957; 20 (01) 22-39
• 3 Otero-Rodriguez A, Tabernero MD, Munoz-Martin MC. et al. Re-evaluating Simpson Grade I, II, and III resections in neurosurgical treatment of World Health Organization Grade I Meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2016; 96: 483-488
• 4 Oya S, Kawai K, Nakatomi H, Saito N. Significance of Simpson grading system in modern meningioma surgery: integration of the grade with MIB-1 labeling index as a key to predict the recurrence of WHO Grade I meningiomas. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (01) 121-128
• 5 Hasseleid BF, Meling TR, Rønning P, Scheie D, Helseth E. Surgery for convexity meningioma: Simpson Grade I resection as the goal: clinical article. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (06) 999-1006
• 6 Gousias K, Schramm J, Simon M. The Simpson grading revisited: aggressive surgery and its place in modern meningioma management. J Neurosurg 2016; 125 (03) 551-560
• 7 Heros RC. Editorial: Simpson grades. J Neurosurg 2012; 117 (06) 997-998 , discussion 998
• 8 Cushing H, Eisenhardt L. Meningiomas: their classification, regional behaviour, life history, and surgical end results. Bull Med Libr Assoc 1938; 27 (02) 185
• 9 Maiuri F, Mariniello G, Peca C. et al. Multicentric and diffuse recurrences of meningiomas. Br J Neurosurg 2020; 34 (04) 439-446
• 10 Voß KM, Spille DC, Sauerland C. et al. The Simpson grading in meningioma surgery: does the tumor location influence the prognostic value?. J Neurooncol 2017; 133 (03) 641-651
• 11 Brokinkel B, Spille DC, Brokinkel C. et al. The Simpson grading: defining the optimal threshold for gross total resection in meningioma surgery. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44 (03) 1713-1720
• 12 Fukushima Y, Oya S, Nakatomi H. et al. Effect of dural detachment on long-term tumor control for meningiomas treated using Simpson grade IV resection. J Neurosurg 2013; 119 (06) 1373-1379
• 13 Lemée JM, Corniola MV, Da Broi M. et al. Extent of resection in meningioma: predictive factors and clinical implications. Sci Rep 2019; 9 (01) 5944
• 14 Borovich B, Doron Y, Braun J. et al. Recurrence of intracranial meningiomas: the role played by regional multicentricity. Part 2: clinical and radiological aspects. J Neurosurg 1986; 65 (02) 168-171
• 15 Slot KM, Verbaan D, Bosscher L, Sanchez E, Vandertop WP, Peerdeman SM. Agreement Between extent of meningioma resection based on surgical Simpson Grade and based on postoperative magnetic resonance imaging findings. World Neurosurg 2018; 111: e856-e862
• 16 Kinjo T, al-Mefty O, Kanaan I. Grade zero removal of supratentorial convexity meningiomas. Neurosurgery 1993; 33 (03) 394-399 , discussion 399
• 17 Dadario NB, Brahimaj B, Yeung J, Sughrue ME. Reducing the cognitive footprint of brain tumor surgery. Front Neurol 2021; 12: 711646
• 18 Dadario NB, Sughrue ME. Should neurosurgeons try to preserve non-traditional brain networks? A systematic review of the neuroscientific evidence. J Pers Med 2022; 12 (04) 587
• 19 Dadario NB, Khatri D, Reichman N, Nwagwu CD, D'Amico RS. 5-Aminolevulinic acid-shedding light on where to focus. World Neurosurg 2021; 150: 9-16
• 20 Dadario NB, Zaman A, Pandya M. et al. Endoscopic-assisted surgical approach for butterfly glioma surgery. J Neurooncol 2022; 156 (03) 635-644
• 21 DeMonte F, Smith HK, al-Mefty O. Outcome of aggressive removal of cavernous sinus meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1994; 81 (02) 245-251
• 22 Sanai N, Sughrue ME, Shangari G, Chung K, Berger MS, McDermott MW. Risk profile associated with convexity meningioma resection in the modern neurosurgical era. J Neurosurg 2010; 112 (05) 913-919
• 23 Nanda A, Bir SC, Maiti TK, Konar SK, Missios S, Guthikonda B. Relevance of Simpson grading system and recurrence-free survival after surgery for World Health Organization Grade I meningioma. J Neurosurg 2017; 126 (01) 201-211
• 24 Schwartz TH, McDermott MW. The Simpson grade: abandon the scale but preserve the message. J Neurosurg 2020; Oct 09 (e-pub ahead of print). DOI: 10.3171/2020.6.JNS201904.
• 25 Rogers L, Barani I, Chamberlain M. et al. Meningiomas: knowledge base, treatment outcomes, and uncertainties. A RANO review. J Neurosurg 2015; 122 (01) 4-23
• 26 Natarajan SK, Sekhar LN, Schessel D, Morita A. Petroclival meningiomas: multimodality treatment and outcomes at long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2007; 60 (06) 965-979 , discussion 979–981
• 27 Heald JB, Carroll TA, Mair RJ. Simpson grade: an opportunity to reassess the need for complete resection of meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2014; 156 (02) 383-388
• 28 Gallagher MJ, Jenkinson MD, Brodbelt AR, Mills SJ, Chavredakis E. WHO grade 1 meningioma recurrence: are location and Simpson grade still relevant?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2016; 141: 117-121
• 29 van Alkemade H, de Leau M, Dieleman EM. et al. Impaired survival and long-term neurological problems in benign meningioma. Neuro-oncol 2012; 14 (05) 658-666
• 30 Behling F, Fodi C, Hoffmann E. et al. The role of Simpson grading in meningiomas after integration of the updated WHO classification and adjuvant radiotherapy. Neurosurg Rev 2021; 44 (04) 2329-2336
• 31 Zentner J, Meyer B, Vieweg U, Herberhold C, Schramm J. Petroclival meningiomas: is radical resection always the best option?. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1997; 62 (04) 341-345
• 32 Goldbrunner R, Minniti G, Preusser M. et al. EANO guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of meningiomas. Lancet Oncol 2016; 17 (09) e383-e391
• 33 Kleihues P, Burger PC, Scheithauer BW. The new WHO classification of brain tumours. Brain Pathol 1993; 3 (03) 255-268
• 34 Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD. et al. The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 2007; 114 (02) 97-109
• 35 Louis DN, Perry A, Reifenberger G. et al. The 2016 World Health Organization Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta Neuropathol 2016; 131 (06) 803-820
• 36 Pearson BE, Markert JM, Fisher WS. et al. Hitting a moving target: evolution of a treatment paradigm for atypical meningiomas amid changing diagnostic criteria. Neurosurg Focus 2008; 24 (05) E3
• 37 Wilson TA, Huang L, Ramanathan D. et al. Review of atypical and anaplastic meningiomas: classification, molecular biology, and management. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 565582
• 38 Rogers L, Gilbert M, Vogelbaum MA. Intracranial meningiomas of atypical (WHO grade II) histology. J Neurooncol 2010; 99 (03) 393-405
• 39 Behling F, Hempel JM, Schittenhelm J. Brain invasion in meningioma-a prognostic potential worth exploring. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13 (13) 3259
• 40 Huntoon K, Toland AMS, Dahiya S. Meningioma: a review of clinicopathological and molecular aspects. Front Oncol 2020; 10: 579599
• 41 Al-Rashed M, Foshay K, Abedalthagafi M. Recent advances in meningioma immunogenetics. Front Oncol 2020; 9: 1472
• 42 Goutagny S, Nault JC, Mallet M, Henin D, Rossi JZ, Kalamarides M. High incidence of activating TERT promoter mutations in meningiomas undergoing malignant progression. Brain Pathol 2014; 24 (02) 184-189
• 43 Amrhein V, Greenland S, McShane B. Scientists rise up against statistical significance. Nature 2019; 567 (7748): 305-307
• 44 Day SE, Halasz LM. Radiation therapy for WHO grade I meningioma. Chin Clin Oncol 2017; 6 (Suppl. 01) S4
• 45 Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Utter A, Giannini C, Schreiner SA. Stereotactic radiosurgery provides equivalent tumor control to Simpson Grade 1 resection for patients with small- to medium-size meningiomas. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2003; 55 (04) 1000-1005
• 46 Materi J, Mampre D, Ehresman J, Rincon-Torroella J, Chaichana KL. Predictors of recurrence and high growth rate of residual meningiomas after subtotal resection. J Neurosurg 2020; 134 (02) 410-416
• 47 Ehresman JS, Garzon-Muvdi T, Rogers D. et al. The Relevance of Simpson Grade Resections in Modern Neurosurgical Treatment of World Health Organization Grade I, II, and III Meningiomas. World Neurosurg 2018; 109: e588-e593