Download PDF
Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes 2024; 132(03): 125-135
DOI: 10.1055/a-2166-6695
Therapie des Typ-1-Diabetes

Therapy for Type 1 Diabetes

Abridged Version of the S3 Guideline (AWMF Register Number: 057-013; 4th Edition, 2018)
Thomas Haak
1   Diabetes Centre Bad Mergentheim, Bad Mergentheim, Germany
,
Stefan Gölz
2   Diabetological Practice, Esslingen, Germany
,
Andreas Fritsche
3   Department of Internal Medicine IV, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
,
Martin Füchtenbusch
4   Diabetes Centre am Marienplatz Munich, Munich, Germany
,
Thorsten Siegmund
5   Isar Hospital, Munich, Germany
,
Elisabeth Schnellbächer
6   Birkenfeld, Germany
,
Harald H. Klein
7   Department of Internal Medicine I - General Internal Medicine, Endocrinology and Diabetology, Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Bergmannsheil University Hospitals, Bochum, Germany
,
Til Uebel
8   prima-diab Practice Drs. Uebel/Nittka/Mayer/Merkle, Ittlingen, Germany
,
Diana Droßel
9   Eschweiler, Germany
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Notice of update

The DDG clinical practice guidelines are updated regularly during the second half of the calendar year. Please note that due to the overlap of the deadlines for the printing version of this clinical practice guideline and the publication of the 5th edition of the S3 guideline on the treatment of type 1 diabetes in September 2023, the present clinical practice guideline still refers to the version from 2018. The current long version of the S3 guideline (09/2023) can be found at: https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/057–013 and on the DDG homepage.



Publication History

Article published online:
16 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • References

  • 1 American Diabetes Association. 2. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: S11-S24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Johnson DD, Palumbo PJ, Chu CP. Diabetic ketoacidosis in a communitybased population. Mayo Clin Proc 1980; 55: 83-88 CoE III
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Bottazzo GF, Florin-Christensen A, Doniach D. Islet-cell antibodies in diabetes mellitus with autoimmune polyendocrine deficiencies. Lancet 1974; 2: 1279-1283 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Palmer JP, Asplin CM, Clemons P. et al. Insulin antibodies in insulin-dependent diabetics before insulin treatment. Science 1983; 222: 1337-1339 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Wiest-Ladenburger U, Hartmann R, Hartmann U. et al. Combined analysis and single-step detection of GAD65 and IA2 autoantibodies in IDDM can replace the histochemical islet cell antibody test. Diabetes 1997; 46: 565-571 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Bingley PJ, Bonifacio E, Mueller PW. Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: first assay proficiency evaluation. Diabetes 2003; 52: 1128-1136 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Törn C, Mueller PW, Schlosser M. et al. Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for autoantibodies to glutamic acid decarboxylase and islet antigen-2. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 846-852 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Schlosser M, Mueller PW, Torn C. et al. Diabetes Antibody Standardization Program: evaluation of assays for insulin autoantibodies. Diabetologia 2010; 53: 2611-2620 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Imagawa A, Hanafusa T, Miyagawa J. et al. A novel subtype of type 1 diabetes mellitus characterized by a rapid onset and an absence of diabetes-related antibodies. Osaka IDDM Study Group. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 301-307 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Type 1 diabetes in adults: diagnosis and management. 2015 CoE IV
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes – 2017. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: 01 CoE IV
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 DCCT Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulindependent diabetes mellitus. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986 CoE Ib
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Fanelli CG, Epifano L, Rambotti AM. et al. Meticulous prevention of hypoglycemia normalizes the glycemic thresholds and magnitude of most of neuroendocrine responses to, symptoms of, and cognitive function during hypoglycemia in intensively treated patients with short-term IDDM. Diabetes 1993; 42: 1683-1689 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Fritsche A, Stefan N, Häring H. et al. Avoidance of hypoglycemia restores hypoglycemia awareness by increasing beta-adrenergic sensitivity in type 1 diabetes. Ann Intern Med 2001; 134: 729-736 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft. S2k-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Verlaufskontrolle des Diabetes mellitus im Alter. Angemeldete Leitlinie in Entstehung. Im Internet: http://www.awmf.org/leitlinien/detail/anmeldung/1/ll/057-017.html CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 16 Lipska KJ, Hirsch IB, Riddle MC. Human Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes: An Effective, Less-Expensive Option. JAMA 2017; 318: 23-24 CoE IV/LoE 4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lucidi P, Porcellati F, Marinelli Andreoli A. et al. Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of NPH Insulin in Type 1 Diabetes: The Importance of Appropriate Resuspension Before Subcutaneous Injection. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 2204-2210 CoE IV
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Wutte A, Plank J, Sinner F. Dose-response relationship and within-subject variability of insulin detemir and NPH insulin in subjects with Type 1 diabetes. Diabetes 2004; 53: A152 CoE IV
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Becker RHA, Frick AD. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin glulisine. Clin Pharmacokinet 2008; 47: 7-20 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Weyer C, Heise T, Heinemann L. Insulin Aspart in a 30/70 Premixed Formulation. Pharmacodynamic properties of a rapid-acting insulin analog in stable mixture. Diabetes Care 1997; 20: 1612-1614 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Woodworth JR, Howey DC, Bowsher RR. et al. Comparative pharmacokinetics and glucodynamics of two human insulin mixtures. 70/30 and 50/50 insulin mixtures. Diabetes Care 1994; 17: 366-371 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Heise T, Hövelmann U, Nosek L. et al. Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles of insulin degludec and insulin glargine. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2015; 11: 1193-1201 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Haahr H, Heise T. A review of the pharmacological properties of insulin degludec and their clinical relevance. Clin Pharmacokinet 2014; 53: 787-800 CoE I
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Nosek L, Coester HV, Roepstorff C. et al. Glucose-Lowering Effect of Insulin Degludec is Independent of Subcutaneous Injection Region. Clin Drug Investig 2014; 34: 673-679 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Koehler G, Treiber G, Wutte A. et al. Pharmacodynamics of the longacting insulin analogues detemir and glargine following single-doses and under steady-state conditions in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2014; 16: 57-62 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Heise T, Pieber TR. Towards peakless, reproducible and long-acting insulins. An assessment of the basal analogues based on isoglycaemic clamp studies. Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 648-659 CoE I
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Becker RHA, Dahmen R, Bergmann K. et al. New insulin glargine 300 Units · mL-1 provides a more even activity profile and prolonged glycemic control at steady state compared with insulin glargine 100 Units · mL-1: The ELEMENT 1 study. Diabetes Care 2015; 38: 637-643 CoEII
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Shiramoto M, Eto T, Irie S. et al. Single-dose new insulin glargine 300 U/ml provides prolonged, stable glycaemic control in Japanese and European people with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab 2015; 17: 254-260 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Heise T, Pieber TR, Danne T. et al. A Pooled Analysis of Clinical Pharmacology Trials Investigating the Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Characteristics of Fast-Acting Insulin Aspart in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Clin Pharmacokinet 2017; 56: 551-559 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Heise T, Eckers U, Kanc K. et al. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of different formulations of biphasic insulin aspart: A randomized, glucose clamp, crossover study. Diabetes Technol Ther 2008; 10: 479-485 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Famulla S, Hovelmann U, Fischer A. et al. Insulin Injection Into Lipohypertrophic Tissue: Blunted and More Variable Insulin Absorption and Action and Impaired Postprandial Glucose Control. Diabetes Care 2016; 39: 1486-1492 CoE II/LoE
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Heise T, Weyer C, Serwas A. et al. Time-Action Profiles of Novel Premixed Preparations of Insulin Lispro and NPL Insulin. Diabetes Care 1998; 21: 800-803 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Rave K, Heinemann L, Puhl L. et al. Premixed formulations of insulin lispro. Activity profiles in type 1 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 1999; 22: 865-866 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Brunner M, Pieber T, Korsatko S. et al. The Distinct Prandial and Basal Pharmacodynamics of IDegAsp Observed in Younger Adults Are Preserved in Elderly Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes. Drugs Aging 2015; 32: 583-590 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Heise T, Nosek L, Roepstorff C. et al. Distinct Prandial and Basal Glucose-Lowering Effects of Insulin Degludec/Insulin Aspart (IDegAsp) at Steady State in Subjects with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus. Diabetes Ther 2014; 5: 255-265 CoE II
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Kurzwirksame Insulinanaloga zur Behandlung des Diabetes mellitus Typ 1. Abschlussbericht. Auftrag A05-02. Version 1.0; 2007. CoE Ia
    PubMed
  • 37 Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. Langwirksame Insulinanaloga zur Behandlung des Diabetes mellitus Typ 1. Abschlussbericht. Auftrag A05-01. Version 1.0; 2010. CoE Ia
    PubMed
  • 38 Singh SR, Ahmad F, Lal A. et al. Efficacy and safety of insulin analogues for the management of diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis. CMAJ 2009; 180: 385-397 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Monami M, Marchionni N, Mannucci E. Long-acting insulin analogues vs. NPH human insulin in type 1 diabetes. A meta-analysis. Diabetes Obes Metab 2009; 11: 372-378 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Mullins P, Sharplin P, Yki-Jarvinen H. et al. Negative binomial meta-regression analysis of combined glycosylated hemoglobin and hypoglycemia outcomes across eleven Phase III and IV studies of insulin glargine compared with neutral protamine Hagedorn insulin in type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus. Clin Ther 2007; 29: 1607-1619 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Ashwell SG, Bradley C, Stephens JW. et al. Treatment satisfaction and quality of life with insulin glargine plus insulin lispro compared with NPH insulin plus unmodified human insulin in individuals with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2008; 31: 1112-1117 CoE Ib
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Hermansen K, Fontaine P, Kukolja KK. et al. Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetologia 2004; 47: 622-629 CoE Ib
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Bühn S, Breuing J, Mathes T. et al. Evidenzbericht zu ausgewählten Rechercheaufträgen im Rahmen der S3-Leitlinie „Therapie des Typ-1-Diabetes“. Witten/Herdecke: IFOM – Institut für Forschung in der Operativen Medizin (Universität Witten/Herdecke); 2016
    Google Scholar
  • 44 Fullerton B, Siebenhofer A, Jeitler K. et al. Short-acting insulin analogues versus regular human insulin for adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016; CD012161 CoE Ia/LoE 1++
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Vardi M, Jacobson E, Nini A. et al. Intermediate acting versus long acting insulin for type 1 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008; CD006297 CoE Ia/LoE 1+
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Retnakaran R, Hochman J, DeVries JH. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections: the impact of baseline A1c. Diabetes Care 2004; 27: 2590-2596 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Fatourechi MM, Kudva YC, Murad MH. et al. Clinical review: Hypoglycemia with intensive insulin therapy: a systematic review and meta-analyses of randomized trials of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009; 94: 729-740 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Jeitler K, Horvath K, Berghold A. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily insulin injections in patients with diabetes mellitus: systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetologia 2008; 51: 941-951 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Pickup JC, Sutton AJ. Severe hypoglycaemia and glycaemic control in Type 1 diabetes: meta-analysis of multiple daily insulin injections compared with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion. Diabet Med 2008; 25: 765-774 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Bolli GB, Kerr D, Thomas R. et al. Comparison of a multiple daily insulin injection regimen (basal once-daily glargine plus mealtime lispro) and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (lispro) in type 1 diabetes: a randomized open parallel multicenter study. Diabetes Care. 2009; 32: 1170-1176 CoE Ib
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Steineck I, Cederholm J, Eliasson B. et al. Insulin pump therapy, multiple daily injections, and cardiovascular mortality in 18168 people with type 1 diabetes: observational study. BMJ 2015; 350: h3234 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Barnard KD, Lloyd CE, Skinner TC. Systematic literature review: quality of life associated with insulin pump use in Type 1 diabetes. Diabet Med 2007; 24: 607-617 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 Hoogma RP, Hammond PJ, Gomis R. et al. Comparison of the effects of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) and NPH-based multiple daily insulin injections (MDI) on glycaemic control and quality of life: results of the 5-nations trial. Diabet Med 2006; 23: 141-147 CoE Ib
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Mukhopadhyay A, Farrell T, Fraser RB. et al. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion vs intensive conventional insulin therapy in pregnant diabetic women: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized, controlled trials. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 447-456 CoE Ia
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Farrar D, Tuffnell DJ, West J. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion versus multiple daily injections of insulin for pregnant women with diabetes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; 3: CD005542 CoE Ia
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Chen R, Ben-Haroush A, Weismann-Brenner A. et al. Level of glycemic control and pregnancy outcome in type 1 diabetes: a comparison between multiple daily insulin injections and continuous subcutaneous insulin infusions. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 404-405 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Cypryk K, Kosinski M, Kaminska P. et al. Diabetes control and pregnancy outcomes in women with type 1 diabetes treated during pregnancy with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or multiple daily insulin injections. Pol Arch Med Wewn 2008; 118: 339-344 CoE IIb
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Gimenez M, Conget I, Nicolau J. et al. Outcome of pregnancy in women with type 1 diabetes intensively treated with continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion or conventional therapy. A case-control study. Acta Diabetol 2007; 44: 34-37 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Alto WA, Meyer D, Schneid J. et al. Assuring the accuracy of home glucose monitoring. J Am Board Fam Pract 2002; 15: 1-6 CoE III
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Saudek CD, Derr RL, Kalyani RR. Assessing glycemia in diabetes using self-monitoring blood glucose and hemoglobin A1c. JAMA 2006; 295: 1688-1697 CoE IV
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 61 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Diabetes – Strukturierte Schulungsprogramme – Langfassung, 1. Auflage. Version 4. CoE IV. Zugriff am 04.11.2017 unter http://www.dm-schulung.versorgungsleitlinien.de
    PubMed
  • 62 Kulzer B, Albus C, Herpertz S. et al. Psychosoziales und Diabetes (Teil 1). Diabetologie 2013; a 8 198-242 CoE IV
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 63 Kulzer B, Albus C, Herpertz S. et al. Psychosoziales und Diabetes (Teil 2). Diabetologie 2013; b 8 292-324 CoE IV
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 64 Hermanns N, Kulzer B, Krichbaum M. Problemspezifische Patientenschulung. Übersicht zu einem wesentlichen Bestandteil der Diabetestherapie. Diabetologe 2008; 4: 361-367 CoE III
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 65 American Diabetes Association. 14. Diabetes Care in the Hospital. Diabetes Care 2017; 40: S120-S127 CoE IV
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 66 Chen HS, Wu TE, Jap TS. et al. Effects of health education on glycemic control during holiday time in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Am J Manag Care 2008; 14: 45-51 CoE Ib/LoE
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 67 Canadian Diabetes Association. 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Prevention and Management of Diabetes in Canada. CoE IV. Zugriff am 23.07.2017 unter http://guidelines.diabetes.ca/app_themes/cdacpg/resources/cpg_2013_full_en.pdf
    PubMed
  • 68 Graveling AJ, Frier BM. Hypoglycaemia: an overview. Prim Care Diabetes 2009; 3: 131-139 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 69 Cryer PE. The barrier of hypoglycemia in diabetes. Diabetes 2008; 57: 3169-3176 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 70 Deary IJ, Hepburn DA, MacLeod KM. et al. Partitioning the symptoms of hypoglycaemia using multi-sample confirmatory factor analysis. Diabetologia 1993; 36: 771-777 CoE III/LoE 3
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 71 McAulay V, Deary IJ, Frier BM. Symptoms of hypoglycaemia in people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2001; 18: 690-705 CoE III
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 72 Haak T, Kellerer M, Deutsche Diabetes Gesellschaft. Diagnostik, Therapie und Verlaufskontrolle des Diabetes mellitus im Kindes- und Jugendalter. Mainz: Kirchheim; 2009. CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 73 Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Murphy MB. et al. Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes: a consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2006; 29: 2739-2748 CoE IV
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 74 Kitabchi AE, Umpierrez GE, Miles JM. et al. Hyperglycemic crises in adult patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009; 32: 1335-1343 CoE IV
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 75 Bull SV, Douglas IS, Foster M. et al. Mandatory protocol for treating adult patients with diabetic ketoacidosis decreases intensive care unit and hospital lengths of stay: results of a nonrandomized trial. Crit Care Med 2007; 35: 41-46 CoE IIb
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 76 Joint British Diabetes Societies for inpatient care. The Management of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Adults. Second Edition Update: September 2013. CoE IV. Zugriff am 23.09.2017 unter; http://www.diabetologistsabcd.org.uk/JBDS/JBDS_IP_DKA_Adults_Revised.pdf
    PubMed
  • 77 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Typ-2-Diabetes – Nierenerkrankungen bei Diabetes im Erwachsenenalter. Version Konsultation 1.0.; 2010. CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 78 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Prävention und Therapie von Netzhautkomplikationen bei Diabetes – Langfassung, 2. Auflage. Version 2. CoE IV. Zugriff am 19.10.2017 unter; http://www.netzhautkomplikationen.versorgungsleitlinien.de
    PubMed
  • 79 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Neuropathie bei Diabetes im Erwachsenenalter. 2010. CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 80 Bundesärztekammer, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Typ-2-Diabetes – Präventions- und Behandlungsstrategien für Fuβkomplikationen. Version 2.8; 2006. CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 81 Bundesärztekammer, Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Wissenschaftlichen Medizinischen Fachgesellschaften, Kassenärztliche Bundesvereinigung. Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Nierenerkrankungen bei Diabetes im Erwachsenenalter. 2010. CoE IV
    PubMed
  • 82 Linnebjerg H, Zhang Q, LaBell E. et al. Pharmacokinetics and Glucodynamics of Ultra Rapid Lispro (URLi) versus Humalog (Lispro) in Younger Adults and Elderly Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomised Controlled Trial. Clin Pharmacokinet 2020; 59: 1589-1599
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar