Download PDF
Facial Plast Surg
DOI: 10.1055/a-2274-0586
Original Article

The Nuances and Techniques of Deep Plane Face and Neck Lifting to Maximize the Defined Neck and Jawline and Obtain a Sharp and Beautiful Neck Contour

Benjamin Talei
1   Beverly Hills Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California
,
Ritu Chopra
2   Plastic Surgery Institute, Beverly Hills, California
,
Hedyeh Ziai
1   Beverly Hills Center for Facial Plastic Surgery, Beverly Hills, California
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

This article seeks to expand on our understanding of lifting by utilizing the benefits of deep plane release and repositioning. The deep plane is a more logical and natural approach to lifting of the face and neck, lifting along the natural anatomic glide planes. Deep plane face and neck lifting have demonstrated superior results in the authors' experience with less dependence on ancillary measures such as fat grafting or implantation for midface volumization. The deep plane technique allows for the face and neck to be treated and lifted as a single composite unit, providing a more natural and long-lasting result and less distortion of underlying structures (i.e., mimetic muscle function). Among facelift surgeons, there is still debate and discussion over treatment of various regions including submandibular gland prominence, jowling and deepened prejowl sulcus, anterior digastric prominence, and a low hyoid. In this article, given the opportunity to share personal experiences, we seek to provide additional insight on the merits of deep plane release in rhytidectomy and our novel approaches to avoiding surgical failures.

Keywords

deep plane - face lift - neck lift - rhytidectomy - SMAS


Publication History

Accepted Manuscript online:
22 February 2024

Article published online:
11 April 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Talei B, Shauly O, Marxen T, Menon A, Gould DJ. The mastoid crevasse and 3-dimensional considerations in deep plane neck lifting. Aesthet Surg J 2024; 44 (02) NP132-NP148
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Jacono AA, Talei B. Vertical neck lifting. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am 2014; 22 (02) 285-316
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Jacono AA, Malone MH, Talei B. Three-dimensional analysis of long-term midface volume change after vertical vector deep-plane rhytidectomy. Aesthet Surg J 2015; 35 (05) 491-503
    Google Scholar
  • 4 Weinstein AL, Nahai F. A layered approach to neck lift. Plast Aesthet Res 2021; 8: 11
    Google Scholar
  • 5 Baker DC. Neck lift. Plast Reconstr Surg 2007; 120 (06) 1735
    Google Scholar
  • 6 Pérez P, Hohman MH. Neck rejuvenation. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing; 2021
    Google Scholar
  • 7 Guerrerosantos J. Necklift. In: Fisher JC, Guerrerosantos J, Gleason M. eds. Manual of Aesthetic Surgery. Comprehensive Manuals of Surgical Specialties. New York: Springer; 1985: 75-83
    Google Scholar
  • 8 O'Daniel TG. Optimizing outcomes in neck lift surgery. Aesthet Surg J 2021; 41 (08) 871-892
    Google Scholar
  • 9 Connell BF, Hosn W. Importance of the digastric muscle in cervical contouring: an update. Aesthet Surg J 2000; 20 (01) 12-16
    Google Scholar
  • 10 Le Louarn C. Hyo-neck lift evolution: neck lift with fixation of the platysma to the deep cervical fascia. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2018; 63 (02) 164-174
    Google Scholar
  • 11 Feldman JJ. Neck lift my way: an update. Plast Reconstr Surg 2014; 134 (06) 1173-1183
    Google Scholar
  • 12 de Castro CC, Carvalho Rodrigues SM. Neck lift (restoring the neck contour). In: Avelar JM. ed. Aesthetic Facial Surgery. Brazil: Springer International Publishing; 2021: 425-437
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Yalamanchili S, Talei B, Azizzadeh B, Auersvald A, Frankel AS. Wound healing complications with tranexamic acid: not the silver bullet after all. Aesthet Surg J 2023; 43 (12) 1409-1415
    Google Scholar
  • 14 Bravo FG. Neck contouring and rejuvenation in male patients through dual-plane reduction neck lift. Clin Plast Surg 2022; 49 (02) 257-273
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Bravo FG. Reduction neck lift: the importance of the deep structures of the neck to the successful neck lift. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 485-506
    Google Scholar
  • 16 McCleary SP, Moghadam S, Le C, Perez K, Sim MS, Roostaeian J. Age-related changes in the submandibular gland: an imaging study of gland ptosis versus volume. Aesthet Surg J 2022; 42 (11) 1222-1235
    Google Scholar
  • 17 Jacono AA, Malone MH. The effect of midline corset platysmaplasty on degree of face-lift flap elevation during concomitant deep-plane face-lift: a cadaveric study. JAMA Facial Plast Surg 2016; 18 (03) 183-187
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Kamer FM, Frankel AS. SMAS rhytidectomy versus deep plane rhytidectomy: an objective comparison. Plast Reconstr Surg 1998; 102 (03) 878-881
    Google Scholar
  • 19 Jacono A, Bryant LM. Extended deep plane facelift: incorporating facial retaining ligament release and composite flap shifts to maximize midface, jawline and neck rejuvenation. Clin Plast Surg 2018; 45 (04) 527-554
    Google Scholar
  • 20 Schmidt KL, Ambadar Z, Cohn JF, Reed LI. MOVEMENT DIFFERENCES BETWEEN DELIBERATE AND SPONTANEOUS FACIAL EXPRESSIONS: ZYGOMATICUS MAJOR ACTION IN SMILING. J Nonverbal Behav 2006; 30 (01) 37-52
    Google Scholar