The Evidence against Prophylactic Nasogastric Intubation and Oral Restriction

Abstract

Evidence-based perioperative care plans after colorectal surgery serve to improve quality outcome, decrease complications, and reduce medical cost. The benefits of routine nasogastric decompression and prolonged enteral restriction after bowel resection are not supported in this new era of evidence-based surgical care. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression fails to improve bowel function, length of stay, and prevent anastomotic leak, wound complications (infection, fascial dehiscence, incisional hernia), pulmonary complications (atelectasis, aspiration, pneumonia, fever, pharyngolaryngitis), and abdominal discomfort (distension, nausea, vomiting). Patients have earlier return of bowel function without the use of a nasogastric tube (NGT). Early refeeding within 24 hours after bowel resection is well tolerated in 80 to 90% of patients, and associated with earlier hospital discharge, decreased risk of infection, and improved postoperative hyperglycemic control. Abdominal discomfort is the most common complication observed in patients treated with early feeding and without a NGT, but does not result in higher therapeutic nasogastric intubation, postoperative ileus, aspiration, or other complications. The use of multimodal adjuncts in combination with these guidelines should be considered to improve outcome. The current literature is reviewed with suggestions for achieving better outcomes after colorectal resection.

Keywords

prophylactic - nasogastric tube - decompression - intestinal resection - colorectal surgery - early enteral nutrition - early feeding - postoperative ileus - enhanced recovery - complications

• References

• 1 Chernoff R. An overview of tube feeding: from ancient times to the future. Nutr Clin Pract 2006; 21 (4) 408-410
• 2 McCamish MA, Bournous G, Geraghty ME. History of enteral feeding: past and present perspectives. In: Rombeau JL, Rolandelli RH, , eds. Clinical Nutrition: Enteral Tube Feeding. 3^rd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders; 1997: 1-11
• 3 Flanagan RJ, Jones AL. Antidotal treatment in the nineteenth century. In: Flanagan RJ, Jones AL, Marrs TC, Maynard RL, , eds. Antidotes: Principles and Clinical Application. London, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2001: 1-34
• 4 Paine JR, Carlson HA, Wangensteen OH. The postoperative control of distention, nausea, and vomiting. A clinical study with reference to the employment of narcotics, cathartics, and nasal catheter suction-siphonage. JAMA 1933; 100 (24) 1910-1917
• 5 Cheatham ML, Chapman WC, Key SP, Sawyers JL. A meta-analysis of selective versus routine nasogastric decompression after elective laparotomy. Ann Surg 1995; 221 (5) 469-476 , discussion 476–478
• 6 Nelson R, Edwards S, Tse B. Prophylactic nasogastric decompression after abdominal surgery. [Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3): CD004929] Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007; (3) CD004929
• 7 Olesen KL, Birch M, Bardram L, Burcharth F. Value of nasogastric tube after colorectal surgery. Acta Chir Scand 1984; 150 (3) 251-253
• 8 Colvin DB, Lee W, Eisenstat TE, Rubin RJ, Salvati EP. The role of nasointestinal intubation in elective colonic surgery. Dis Colon Rectum 1986; 29 (5) 295-299
• 9 Ortiz H, Armendariz P, Yarnoz C. Is early postoperative feeding feasible in elective colon and rectal surgery?. Int J Colorectal Dis 1996; 11 (3) 119-121
• 10 Lei WZ, Zhao GP, Cheng Z, Li K, Zhou ZG. Gastrointestinal decompression after excision and anastomosis of lower digestive tract. World J Gastroenterol 2004; 10 (13) 1998-2001
• 11 Zhou T, Wu XT, Zhou YJ, Huang X, Fan W, Li YC. Early removing gastrointestinal decompression and early oral feeding improve patients' rehabilitation after colorectostomy. World J Gastroenterol 2006; 12 (15) 2459-2463
• 12 Wolff BG, Pembeton JH, van Heerden JA , et al. Elective colon and rectal surgery without nasogastric decompression. A prospective, randomized trial. Ann Surg 1989; 209 (6) 670-673 , discussion 673–675
• 13 Racette DL, Chang FC, Trekell ME, Farha GJ. Is nasogastric intubation necessary in colon operations?. Am J Surg 1987; 154 (6) 640-642
• 14 Otchy DP, Wolff BG, van Heerden JA, Ilstrup DM, Weaver AL, Winter LD. Does the avoidance of nasogastric decompression following elective abdominal colorectal surgery affect the incidence of incisional hernia? Results of a prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38 (6) 604-608
• 15 Cunningham J, Temple WJ, Langevin JM, Kortbeek J. A prospective randomized trial of routine postoperative nasogastric decompression in patients with bowel anastomosis. Can J Surg 1992; 35 (6) 629-632
• 16 Petrelli NJ, Stulc JP, Rodriguez-Bigas M, Blumenson L. Nasogastric decompression following elective colorectal surgery: a prospective randomized study. Am Surg 1993; 59 (10) 632-635
• 17 Phillips EH, Franklin M, Carroll BJ, Fallas MJ, Ramos R, Rosenthal D. Laparoscopic colectomy. Ann Surg 1992; 216 (6) 703-707
• 18 Jacobs M, Verdeja JC, Goldstein HS. Minimally invasive colon resection (laparoscopic colectomy). Surg Laparosc Endosc 1991; 1 (3) 144-150
• 19 Reissman P, Teoh TA, Cohen SM, Weiss EG, Nogueras JJ, Wexner SD. Is early oral feeding safe after elective colorectal surgery? A prospective randomized trial. Ann Surg 1995; 222 (1) 73-77
• 20 Carr CS, Ling KDE, Boulos P , et al. Randomized trial of safety and efficacy of immediate postoperative enteral feeding in patients undergoing gastrointestinal resection. BMJ 1996; 312: 896-871
• 21 Lassen K, Soop M, Nygren J , et al; Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group. Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Group recommendations. Arch Surg 2009; 144 (10) 961-969
• 22 Wang G, Jiang ZW, Xu J , et al. Fast-track rehabilitation program vs conventional care after colorectal resection: a randomized clinical trial. World J Gastroenterol 2011; 17 (5) 671-676
• 23 Andersen HK, Lewis SJ, Thomas S. Early enteral nutrition within 24 h of colorectal surgery versus later commencement of feeding for postoperative complications. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (4) CD004080 10.1002/14651858.CD004080.pub2
• 24 Lewis SJ, Egger M, Sylvester PA. Early enteral feeding versus nil by mouth after gastrointestinal surgery; systemic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. BJM 2001; 323: 1-5
• 25 Sagar S, Harland P, Shields R. Early postoperative feeding with elemental diet. BMJ 1979; 1 (6159) 293-295
• 26 Binderow SR, Cohen SM, Wexner SD, Nogueras JJ. Must early postoperative oral intake be limited to laparoscopy?. Dis Colon Rectum 1994; 37 (6) 584-589
• 27 Delaney CP, Zutshi M, Senagore AJ, Remzi FH, Hammel J, Fazio VW. Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2003; 46 (7) 851-859
• 28 Soop M, Carlson GL, Hopkinson J , et al. Randomized clinical trial of the effects of immediate enteral nutrition on metabolic responses to major colorectal surgery in an enhanced recovery protocol. Br J Surg 2004; 91 (9) 1138-1145
• 29 Stewart BT, Woods RJ, Collopy BT, Fink RJ, Mackay JR, Keck JO. Early feeding after elective open colorectal resections: a prospective randomized trial. Aust N Z J Surg 1998; 68 (2) 125-128
• 30 Carlisle JB, Stevenson CA. Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2006; (3) CD004125
• 31 Delaney CP, Wolff BG, Viscusi ER , et al. Alvimopan, for postoperative ileus following bowel resection: a pooled analysis of phase III studies. Ann Surg 2007; 245 (3) 355-363
• 32 Watters JM, Kirkpatrick SM, Norris SB, Shamji FM, Wells GA. Immediate postoperative enteral feeding results in impaired respiratory mechanics and decreased mobility. Ann Surg 1997; 226 (3) 369-377 , discussion 377–380