Download PDF
J Knee Surg 2014; 27(04): 289-294
DOI: 10.1055/s-0033-1360660
Original Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

A New Simplified Onlay Technique for Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Rodrigo Salim
1   Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Locomotor System, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
,
Fabricio Fogagnolo
1   Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Locomotor System, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
,
Mauricio Kfuri Jr.
1   Department of Biomechanics, Medicine and Rehabilitation of Locomotor System, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, São Paulo University, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

09 September 2013

23 September 2013

Publication Date:
13 November 2013 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

The integrity of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is essential for the normal kinematics of the knee. Injury to the PCL has adverse consequences, with worsening of functional performance and an increased risk to develop osteoarthritis. Conservative treatment is sometimes adopted, not only because it is an acceptable option for selected patients but also due to the lack of consensus in the orthopedic literature regarding the best surgical method. Hereby we describe a simplified technique for onlay PCL reconstruction pointing out possible advantages if compared with the traditional transtibial or inlay techniques.

Keywords

cruciate ligament - ligament reconstruction - technique
 

  • References

  • 1 Schulte KR, Chu ET, Fu FH. Arthroscopic posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 1997; 16 (1) 145-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Boynton MD, Tietjens BR. Long-term followup of the untreated isolated posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee. Am J Sports Med 1996; 24 (3) 306-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Dandy DJ, Pusey RJ. The long-term results of unrepaired tears of the posterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1982; 64 (1) 92-94
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Keller PM, Shelbourne KD, McCarroll JR, Rettig AC. Nonoperatively treated isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. Am J Sports Med 1993; 21 (1) 132-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Parolie JM, Bergfeld JA. Long-term results of nonoperative treatment of isolated posterior cruciate ligament injuries in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 1986; 14 (1) 35-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Patel DV, Allen AA, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Simonian PT. The nonoperative treatment of acute, isolated (partial or complete) posterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: an intermediate-term follow-up study. HSS J 2007; 3 (2) 137-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Shelbourne KD, Davis TJ, Patel DV. The natural history of acute, isolated, nonoperatively treated posterior cruciate ligament injuries. A prospective study. Am J Sports Med 1999; 27 (3) 276-283
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Hermans S, Corten K, Bellemans J. Long-term results of isolated anterolateral bundle reconstructions of the posterior cruciate ligament: a 6- to 12-year follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 2009; 37 (8) 1499-1507
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Lee GW, Jang SJ, Choi Y, Son JH. Accessory anterolateral portal in arthroscopic PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2013; 21 (5) 1043-1049
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Jung YB, Tae SK, Jung HJ, Lee KH. Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (9) 1878-1883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Bergfeld JA, McAllister DR, Parker RD, Valdevit AD, Kambic HE. A biomechanical comparison of posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29 (2) 129-136
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 McAllister DR, Markolf KL, Oakes DA, Young CR, McWilliams J. A biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Am J Sports Med 2002; 30 (3) 312-317
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Markolf KL, Zemanovic JR, McAllister DR. Cyclic loading of posterior cruciate ligament replacements fixed with tibial tunnel and tibial inlay methods. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (4) 518-524
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Oakes DA, Markolf KL, McWilliams J, Young CR, McAllister DR. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay and tibial tunnel techniques for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Analysis of graft forces. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002; 84-A (6) 938-944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Margheritini F, Mauro CS, Rihn JA, Stabile KJ, Woo SL, Harner CD. Biomechanical comparison of tibial inlay versus transtibial techniques for posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: analysis of knee kinematics and graft in situ forces. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (3) 587-593
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Cooper DE, Stewart D. Posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using single-bundle patella tendon graft with tibial inlay fixation: 2- to 10-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (2) 346-360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Chuang TY, Ho WP, Chen CH, Liao YS, Chen WJ. Double-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using inlay technique with quadriceps tendon-bone autograft. Arthroscopy 2004; 20 (4) e23-e28
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Noyes FR, Barber-Westin S. Posterior cruciate ligament replacement with a two-strand quadriceps tendon-patellar bone autograft and a tibial inlay technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87 (6) 1241-1252
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Stannard JP, Riley RS, Sheils TM, McGwin Jr G, Volgas DA. Anatomic reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament after multiligament knee injuries. A combination of the tibial-inlay and two-femoral-tunnel techniques. Am J Sports Med 2003; 31 (2) 196-202
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Berg EE. Posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Arthroscopy 1995; 11 (1) 69-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Thomann YR, Gaechter A. Dorsal approach for reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1994; 113 (3) 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Abbott LC, Carpenter WF. Surgical approaches to the knee joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1945; 27 (2) 277-310
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Trickey EL. Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment of early injuries and reconstruction of late instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 147 (147) 76-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Park SE, Stamos BD, DeFrate LE, Gill TJ, Li G. The effect of posterior knee capsulotomy on posterior tibial translation during posterior cruciate ligament tibial inlay reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 2004; 32 (6) 1514-1519
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Burks RT, Schaffer JJ. A simplified approach to the tibial attachment of the posterior cruciate ligament. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1990; 254 (254) 216-219
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Nicandri GT, Klineberg EO, Wahl CJ, Mills WJ. Treatment of posterior cruciate ligament tibial avulsion fractures through a modified open posterior approach: operative technique and 12- to 48-month outcomes. J Orthop Trauma 2008; 22 (5) 317-324
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Trickey EL. Injuries to the posterior cruciate ligament: diagnosis and treatment of early injuries and reconstruction of late instability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980; 147 (147) 76-81
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Jung Y-B, Tae S-K, Jung HJ, Lee K-H. Replacement of the torn posterior cruciate ligament with a mid-third patellar tendon graft with use of a modified tibial inlay method. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004; 86-A (9) 1878-1883
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Noyes FR, Medvecky MJ, Bhargava M. Arthroscopically assisted quadriceps double-bundle tibial inlay posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis of techniques and a safe operative approach to the popliteal fossa. Arthroscopy 2003; 19 (8) 894-905
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Lin YC, Chen SK, Liu TH, Cheng YM, Chou PP. Arthroscopic transtibial single-bundle posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using patellar tendon graft compared with hamstring tendon graft. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2013; 133 (4) 523-530
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Höher J, Scheffler S, Weiler A. Graft choice and graft fixation in PCL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2003; 11 (5) 297-306
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar