Noninvasive Imaging of the Biliary System Relevant to Percutaneous Interventions

Abstract

Clinical data such as history, physical examination, and laboratory tests are useful in identifying patients with biliary obstruction and biliary sources of infection. However, if intervention is planned, noninvasive imaging is needed to confirm the presence, location, and extent of the disease process. Currently, the most commonly available and used noninvasive modalities are ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR), and nuclear medicine hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HIDA). US is quick, portable, readily available, and is commonly the first imaging modality used when biliary pathology is suspected. It is excellent in the detection of cholelithiasis and acute cholecystitis but is limited in detecting choledocholithiasis. CT is excellent at detecting infected postoperative fluid collections, bilomas, biliary obstruction, and biliary infection but is limited in the detection of cholelithiasis. Therefore, US may be more useful than CT for the initial screening of acute biliary disease. MR has inherent advantages over CT, as it does not use ionizing radiation, can be done without intravenous contrast, and its detection of cholelithiasis is not affected by the internal composition of the stone. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography can be used to determine the cause and location of biliary obstruction but is limited in the detection of small stones and the evaluation of the biliary tract near the ampulla. HIDA is used to evaluate for cholecystitis, biliary obstruction, and bile leaks. The main limitation is its lack of anatomical detail, and it is therefore frequently performed in conjunction with other described modalities.

Keywords

cholelithiasis - cholecystitis - interventional radiology - biliary obstruction - biloma

• References

• 1 Shea JA, Berlin JA, Escarce JJ , et al. Revised estimates of diagnostic test sensitivity and specificity in suspected biliary tract disease. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154 (22) 2573-2581
• 2 Bortoff GA, Chen MY, Ott DJ, Wolfman NT, Routh WD. Gallbladder stones: imaging and intervention. Radiographics 2000; 20 (3) 751-766
• 3 Tse F, Barkun JS, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Bornstein JD, Barkun AN. Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction. HPB (Oxford) 2006; 8 (6) 409-425
• 4 Lee CM, Stewart L, Way LW. Postcholecystectomy abdominal bile collections. Arch Surg 2000; 135 (5) 538-542 , discussion 542–544
• 5 Chan WC, Joe BN, Coakley FV , et al. Gallstone detection at CT in vitro: effect of peak voltage setting. Radiology 2006; 241 (2) 546-553
• 6 Soyer P, Hoeffel C, Dohan A , et al. Acute cholecystitis: quantitative and qualitative evaluation with 64-section helical CT. Acta Radiol 2013; 54 (5) 477-486
• 7 Grayson DE, Abbott RM, Levy AD, Sherman PM. Emphysematous infections of the abdomen and pelvis: a pictorial review. Radiographics 2002; 22 (3) 543-561
• 8 Miller FH, Hwang CM, Gabriel H, Goodhartz LA, Omar AJ, Parsons III WG. Contrast-enhanced helical CT of choledocholithiasis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (1) 125-130
• 9 Choi SH, Han JK, Lee JM , et al. Differentiating malignant from benign common bile duct stricture with multiphasic helical CT. Radiology 2005; 236 (1) 178-183
• 10 Thomas S, Patel RP, Oto A. Resolution of pneumobilia as a predictor of biliary stent occlusion. Clin Imaging 2015; 39 (4) 650-653
• 11 Bang BW, Jeong S, Lee DH, Kim CH, Cho SG, Jeon YS. Curved planar reformatted images of MDCT for differentiation of biliary stent occlusion in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010; 194 (6) 1509-1514
• 12 Kim SW, Shin HC, Kim HC, Hong MJ, Kim IY. Diagnostic performance of multidetector CT for acute cholangitis: evaluation of a CT scoring method. Br J Radiol 2012; 85 (1014) 770-777
• 13 Arai K, Kawai K, Kohda W, Tatsu H, Matsui O, Nakahama T. Dynamic CT of acute cholangitis: early inhomogeneous enhancement of the liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003; 181 (1) 115-118
• 14 Tsai HM, Lin XZ, Chen CY, Lin PW, Lin JC. MRI of gallstones with different compositions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 182 (6) 1513-1519
• 15 Romagnuolo J, Bardou M, Rahme E, Joseph L, Reinhold C, Barkun AN. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary disease. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139 (7) 547-557
• 16 David V, Reinhold C, Hochman M , et al. Pitfalls in the interpretation of MR cholangiopancreatography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998; 170 (4) 1055-1059
• 17 Griffin N, Charles-Edwards G, Grant LA. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: the ABC of MRCP. Insights Imaging 2012; 3 (1) 11-21
• 18 Sinha R, Rajiah P, Ramachandran I, Sanders S, Murphy PD. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the gastrointestinal tract: technique, indications, and imaging findings. Radiographics 2013; 33 (3) 655-676 , discussion 676–680
• 19 Ziessman HA. Nuclear medicine hepatobiliary imaging. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2010; 8 (2) 111-116
• 20 Weissmann HS, Frank MS, Bernstein LH, Freeman LM. Rapid and accurate diagnosis of acute cholecystitis with 99mTc-HIDA cholescintigraphy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1979; 132 (4) 523-528
• 21 O'Connor OJ, Maher MM. Imaging of cholecystitis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011; 196 (4) W367-74
• 22 Rayter Z, Tonge C, Bennett C, Thomas M, Robinson P. Ultrasound and HIDA: scanning in evaluating bile leaks after cholecystectomy. Nucl Med Commun 1991; 12 (3) 197-202