Nervenheilkunde 2011; 30(07): 509-516
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1628388
Übersichtsartikel
Schattauer GmbH

Heuristische Typologien von Alkoholabhängigen

Persönlichkeitsbezogene KlassifikationenHeuristic typologies of alcoholicsPersonality related classifications
K. Bühler
1   Institut für Psychotherapie und Medizinische Psychologie, Universität Würzburg
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Eingegangen am: 17 May 2010

angenommen am: 28 September 2010

Publication Date:
23 January 2018 (online)

Zusammenfassung

Trotz der Bedeutung biografischer Faktoren für die Alkoholabhängigkeit und Behandlung von Alkoholabhängigen haben wenige Studien biografische Daten von Alkoholabhängigen untersucht. Deshalb wurden in unserer Studie biografische Variablen zusätzlich zu Persönlichkeitsvariablen berücksichtigt. Die Personen wurden clusteranalysiert. Eine 5-Clusterlösung ergab eine gut interpretierbare Klassifikation. Das hinsichtlich des Schweregrades der Störung am wenigsten gestörte Cluster 2 (normovalenter Typ) wurde gefolgt von Cluster 4 (zielgerichtet neurotischer Typ), Cluster 1 (sozionoxischer Typ), Cluster 5 (desorganisiert neurotischer Typ) und Cluster 3 (neurosozionoxischer Typ). Der normovalente Typ ist der signifikant älteste und der neurosozionoxische Typ der signifikant jüngste Typ. Frauen überwiegen in den Typen mit der stärksten Beeinträchtigung, das heißt, im Cluster 3 und 5. Patienten des Clusters 2 entstammen signifikant seltener, Patienten des Clusters 3 hingegen signifikant häufiger unvollständigen Familien. Patienten des Clusters 2 wuchsen signifikant häufiger bei ihren Eltern auf, Patienten des Clusters 3 und 5 hingegen signifikant weniger. Patienten des Clusters 2 und 4 lebten signifikant häufiger in Partnerschaften als die restlichen Cluster. Den entdeckten Typen von Alkoholabhängigen kommt nicht nur eine deskriptive Bedeutung zu, sondern in Anbetracht des unterschiedlichen Schweregrades der Störung auch eine differenzialtherapeutische. Daher wird entsprechend des Schweregrades der Störung eine Differenzialtherapie vorgeschlagen.

Summary

In spite of the impact of biographical factors on alcoholism and on the therapy of alcoholics there are few studies which investigate statistically biographical data of alcoholics. This is the reason why biographical variables in addition to personality variables are taken into consideration in our investigation. The 5-clustersolution was accepted, which yields a well-interpretable classification. The least impaired cluster is cluster 2 (named: normovalent cluster) followed by cluster 4 (aim-related neurotic cluster), cluster 1 (socionoxic cluster), cluster 5 (desorganised-neurotic cluster), and cluster 3 (neurosocionoxic cluster). Cluster 2 is significantly the oldest cluster and cluster 3 the youngest cluster. Female subjects prevail significantly in clusters with higher severity of impairment, i. e. in cluster 3 and 5. Subjects of cluster 2 originate significantly less often from broken homes, whereas subjects of cluster 3 originate significantly more often from broken homes. Subjects of cluster 2 were significantly more often brought up by their parents, whereas subjects of cluster 3 and 5 were significantly less often brought up by their parents. Subjects of cluster 2 and 4 significantly less often spent their life as singles than the rest of the clusters, cluster 1, 3, and 5. The questionnaire is also suitable for the selection of alcoholics and for allocation to appropriate therapy settings. Thus, the reported clusters of alcoholics have not only a descriptive or classificatory importance but also, considering the severity of impairment attributed to the clusters, an impact on differential therapy with regard to the severity of impairment. A differential therapy of alcoholics according to the severity of impairment and therefore to the clusters is suggested.

 
  • Literatur

  • 1 Alterman AI. et al. Personality pathology and drinking in young men at high and low familial risk for alcoholism. J Stud Alc 1998; 59: 495-502.
  • 2 Antons K, Hampel R. Empirische Taxonometrie: Ein Weg zur differentiellen Therapieindikation. In: Antons K, Schulz W. Normales Trinken und Suchtentwicklung. Bd. 2. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1977
  • 3 Babor TF, Lauerman J. Classification and forms of inebrity. recent dev alcohol 1986; 04: 13-144.
  • 4 Babor TF. et al. Types of alcoholics. Arch Gen Psychiat 1992; 49: 599-608.
  • 5 Becker K. et al. Soziales Umfeld von Alkoholikern und sein Einfluss auf den Behandlungserfolg. Psychiat Prax 1986; 13: 121-7.
  • 6 Blashfield RK. Propositions regarding the use of cluster analysis in clinical research. J Consult Clin Psychol 1980; 48: 4.
  • 7 Bowman KM, Jellinek EM. (1941): Alcohol addiction and its treatment. Quart J Stud Alc 1941; 02: 98-175.
  • 8 Brown J. et al. Type A/Type B distinction. subtyping alcoholics according to indicators of vulnerability and severity. Annals New York Academy of science 1994; 708: 23-33.
  • 9 Bucholz KK. et al. A latent class analysis of data from relatives of alcoholics in a multicenter family study of alcoholism. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1996; 20: 1462-71.
  • 10 Bühler KE, Bardeleben H. Heuristic cluster analysis of alcoholics according to biographic and personality features, in: Addiction Research and Theory. 2008 16. 453-73.
  • 11 Cattell RB, Eber HJ. The sixteen personality factor questionnaire; Institute for personality and ability testing (IPAT); Champaign/Ill. 1964
  • 12 Cloninger CR. A systematic method for clinical description and classification of personality description variants. Arch Gen Psychiat 1987; 44: 573-88.
  • 13 Corbisiero JR, Reznikoff M. The relationship between personality type and style of alcohol use. J Clin Psychol 1991; 47: 291-8.
  • 14 Donovan DM, Kivlahan DR, Walker RD. Alcoholic subtypes based on multiple assessment domains: Validation against treatment outcome. Recent dev alcohol 1986; 04: 207-22.
  • 15 Driessen M. et al. Axis I and Axis II comorbidity in alcohol dependence and the two types of alcoholism. Alc Clin Exp Res 1998; 22: 77-86.
  • 16 Evenson RC. et al. Factors in the description and grouping of alcoholics. Am J Psychiat 1973; 130: 49-54.
  • 17 Farren CK. et al. Alcoholism and typology: findings in an irish private hospital population. J Stud Alc 1996; 57: 249-52.
  • 18 Finney JW, Moos RH. Treatment and outcome for empirical subtypes of alcoholic patients. J Consult Clin Psychol 1979; 47: 25-38.
  • 19 Fink EB. et al. Effectiveness of alcoholism treatment in partial versus inpatient settings. Addict behav 1985; 10: 235-48.
  • 20 Funke W. Differentielle Diagnostik bei Alkoholauffälligen. Suchtgefahren 1987; 33: 321-9.
  • 21 Funke J, Funke W. Erste Hinweise auf die differentielle Brauchbarkeit des Trierer Alkoholismus Inventars. Suchtgefahren 1985; 32: 57-64.
  • 22 Funke J, Klein M, Scheller R. Zur Klassifikation von Alkoholikern durch Persönlichkeitsmerkmale. Psychol Beitr 1981; 23: 146-58.
  • 23 Goldstein SG, Linden JD. Multivariate Classification of alcoholics by means of the MMPI. J Abnorm Psychol 1969; 74: 661-9.
  • 24 Graham JR, Strenger VE. MMPI Characteristics of alcoholics: a review. J Consult Clin Psychol 1986; 56: 197-205.
  • 25 Hart LS, Stueland D. An application of the multidimensional model of alcoholism. J Stud Alc 1979; 40: 283-90.
  • 26 Hart LS, Stueland D. An application of the multidimensional model of alcoholism to program effectiveness. J Stud Alc 1979; 40: 645-55.
  • 27 Hathaway SR, McKinley JC. Minnesota multiphasic personality inventory, 2. University of Minnesotapress; Minneapolis: 2000
  • 28 Hauser J, Zakrzewska M. The typological analysis of males with alcohol dependence disorder. Psychiat Pol 1996; 30: 821-33.
  • 29 Hauser J, Rybakowski J. Three clusters of male alcoholics. Drug Alc Dep 1997; 48: 243-50.
  • 30 Hill HE. et al. A MMPI factor analytic study of alcoholics, narcotic addicts and criminals. Quart J Stud Alc 1962; 23: 411-31.
  • 31 Hoffmann M. et al. Identifying future alcoholics with MMPI alcoholism scales. Quart J Stud Alc 1974; 35: 490-8.
  • 32 Isenhart CE. Motivational subtypes in an inpatient sample of substance abusers. Addict Behav 1994; 19: 463-75.
  • 33 Jackson DN, Messica S. A differential personality inventory. London, Ontario: Gilford; 1971
  • 34 Jellinek EM. Alcoholism, a genus and some of its species. Canad Med Ass J 1960; 83: 1341-5.
  • 35 Jessor R, Jessor S. Die Entwicklung Jugendlicher und der Beginn des Alkoholismus. Eine Längsschnittuntersuchung. In: Vogler RE, Revenstorf D. Fortschritte der Klinischen Psychologie. München: Urban und Schwarzenberg; 1978
  • 36 Johnson EO. et al. subtypes of alcoholdependent men. Amer Soc Alc 1996; 20: 1472-80.
  • 37 Jones MC. Personality correlates and antecedants of drinking patterns in adult males. J Consult Clin Psychol 1968; 32: 2-12.
  • 38 von Knorring L. et al. Relationship between treatment outcome and subtype of alcoholism in men. J Stud Alcohol 1985; 46: 388-91.
  • 39 Lemere F. What causes alcoholism?. J Clin Exp Psychopath 1956; 17: 202-6.
  • 40 Loper RG. et al. MMPI characteristics of college freshman males who later became alcoholics. J Abnorm Psychol 1973; 82: 159-62.
  • 41 Matano RA. et al. Millon clinical multiaxial inventory personality subtypes for male and female alcoholics. J Personal Ass 1994; 63: 250-64.
  • 42 McKinley AP. Ancient experience with intoxicating drink: Non-classical peoples. Quart J Stud Alcohol 1949; 09: 388-414.
  • 43 McCord J. Etiological factors in alcoholism. Quart J Stud Alc 1972; 33: 1020-7.
  • 44 McGue M. et al. Personality an substance use disorders. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 1997; 21: 513-20.
  • 45 Morey LC, Blashfield RK. Empirical classification of alcoholism. J Stud Alc 1981; 42: 925-37.
  • 46 Morey LC, Skinner HA. Empirically derived classification of alcohol-related problems. Galanter M. Recent dev alcohol 1986; 04: 145-68.
  • 47 Morey LC, Skinner HA, Blashfield RK. A typology of alcohol abusers: Correlates and implications. J Abnorm Psychol 1984; 93 (04) 408-17.
  • 48 Nerviano VJ. Common personality patterns among alcoholic males: a Multivariate study. J Consult Clin Psychol 1976; 44: 104-10.
  • 49 Nerviano VJ. Personality patterns of alcoholics revisited: Delineation against the MMPI and clinical Implications. Int J Addict 1981; 16: 723-9.
  • 50 Nerviano VJ, Gross HW. Personality types of alcoholics on objective inventories: A Review. J Stud Alcohol 1983; 44: 837-49.
  • 51 Ohanassian CM. et al. Temperament and personality typologies in adult offsprings of alcoholics. J Stud Alc 1995; 56: 318-27.
  • 52 O’Leary MR. et al. Relationship of alcoholic personality subtypes to treatment follow-up measure. J Nerv Ment Dis 1980; 168: 475-80.
  • 53 Overall JE. MMPI personality patterns of alcoholics and narcotic addicts. Quart. J Stud Alc 1973; 34: 104-11.
  • 54 Partington JD, Johnson FG. Personality types among alcoholics. Quart J Stud Alcohol 1969; 30: 21-34.
  • 55 Rist F, Watzl H. Clusteranalysen von Persönlichkeitsmerkmalen: ein Weg zur differentiellen Therapiezuweisung von Alkoholkranken. Z Klin Psychol 1989; 27: 166-72.
  • 56 Rohan WP. et al. MMPIchanges in alcoholics during hospitalization. Quart J Stud Alc 1969; 30: 389-400.
  • 57 Rosen AC. A comparative study of alcoholics and psychiatric patients with the MMPI. Quart J Stud Alc 1960; 21: 253-66.
  • 58 Rubio G. et al. Clinical significance of cloninger’s classification in a sample of alcoholic spanish men. Addiction 1998; 93: 93-101.
  • 59 Scheller R, Klein M. Persönlichkeitspsychologische Determinanten des Therapieerfolges bei Alkoholabhängigen. Z Diff Diag Psychol 1982; 03: 47-54.
  • 60 Skinner HA. et al. Alcoholic personality types: Identification and correlates. J Abnorm Psychol 1974; 83: 658-66.
  • 61 Skinner HA, Reed PL, Jackson DN. Toward the objektive diagnosis of psychopathology: Generalizability of modal personality profiles. J Couns Clin Psychol 1976; 44 (01) 111-7.
  • 62 Snowdon LR. et al. An empirical typology of problem drinkers from the Michigan Alcoholism Screening Test. Addict Behav 1986; 11: 37-48.
  • 63 Tarter RE. Multivariate typology of adolescents with alcohol use disorder. Am J Add 1997; 06: 150-8.
  • 64 Whitelock PR. et al. Personality patterns and alcohol abuse in a state hospital population. J Abnorm Psychol 1971; 76: 9-16.
  • 65 Yoshino A. et al. Examination of the tridimensional personality hypothesis of alcoholism using empirically multivariate typology. Alcoholi Clin Exp Res 1994; 18: 1121-4.
  • 66 Zivich JM. Alcoholic subtypes and treatment effectiveness. J Consult Clin Psychol 1981; 49: 72-80.