Download PDF
Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2003; 16(04): 232-237
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1632785
Original Research
Schattauer GmbH

Assessing the efficacy of long-term administration of Tolfenamic acid in dogs undergoing femoral head and neck excision

B. Charette
1   Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
,
J. Dupuis
1   Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
,
M. Moreau
1   Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
,
S. Daminet
2   Department of Medicine and Clinical Biology of Small Animals, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Belgium
,
P. Hébert
3   Veterinary Diagnostic Imaging and Cytopathology, Clackamas, Oregon, USA
,
E. Grisneaux
1   Faculté de Médecine Vétérinaire, University of Montreal, St-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received 28 February 2003

Accepted 30 May 2003

Publication Date:
22 February 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Summary

Femoral head and neck excision (FHNE) is a salvage procedure routinely performed when severe osteoarthritis is present and clinical signs cannot be managed by conservative treatment, or when total hip replacement is cost prohibitive for the owners. The purpose of the study reported herein was to evaluate the adverse effects and efficacy of long-term administration of Tolfenamic acid in dogs undergoing FHNE. Twenty dogs admitted with clinical signs associated with bilateral hip degenerative joint disease and weighing more than 20 kg were included in the study. Ten dogs received Tolfenamic acid for four months following FHNE and 10 dogs received a placebo. At four months after surgery, the placebo group had a significant decrease, compared with pre-operative values, in peak vertical force (PVF) (60.38% BW vs 64.77% BW, p = 0.046), and a significant decrease in vertical impulse (VI) (8.38% BW x sec. vs 9.64% BW x sec., p = 0.023). There was not any significant difference between pre- and post-operative results in the Tolfenamic acid group regarding PVF (65.13% BW vs 63.31% BW, p = 0.296) and VI (8.24% BW x sec. vs 8.71% BW x sec., p = 0.945). A significant difference was not found between the two groups with regard to endoscopic evaluation of mucosal lesions. Subjectively, the owners of the dogs in the Tolfenamic acid group reported an earlier use of the limb, a more compliant dog during physical therapy and a more rapid return to a ‘normal’ gait. Long-term administration of Tolfenamic acid may therefore be recommended, following FHNE, to improve the results of the operation.

Keywords

Hip dysplasia - Tolfenamic acid - force plate analysis
 

  • References

  • 1 Bennett RL, DeCamp CE, Flo GL. Kinematic gait analysis in dogs with hip dysplasia. AJVR 1996; 57: 966-71.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Budsberg SC, Jevens DJ, Brown J. Evaluation of limb symmetry indices, using ground reaction forces in healthy dogs. Am J Vet Res 1993; 54: 1569-74.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Budsberg SC, Verstraete MC, Brown J. et al. Vertical loading rates in clinically normal dogs at a trot. Am J Vet Res 1995; 56: 1275-80.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Cook JL, Tomlinson JL, Constantinescu GM. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and treatment of canine hip dysplasia. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1996; 18: 853-66.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Cross AR, Budsberg SC, Keefe TJ. Kinetic gait analysis assessment of meloxicam efficacy in a sodium urate-induced synovitis model in dogs. AJVR 1997; 58: 626-31.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Dueland RT, Dogan S, Vanderby R. Biomechanical comparison of standard excisional hip arthroplasty and modified deep gluteal muscle transfer excisional arthroplasty. Vet Com. Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 95-100.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Duff R, Campbell JR. Long term results of excision arthroplasty of the canine hip. Vet Record 1977; 101: 181-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Eskerod O. Gastrointestinal tolerance studies on Tolfenamic acid in humans and animals. J Pharmacol Toxicol 1994; 75: 44-8.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Forrester SD, Troy GC. Renal effects of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1999; 21: 910-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Forsyth SF, Guilford WG, Haslett SJ. Endoscopy of the gastroduodenal mucosa after carprofen, meloxicam and ketoprofen administration in dogs. J Small Anim Pract 1998; 39: 421-4.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Gendreau C, Cawley AJ. Excision of the femoral head and neck: The long-term results of 35 operations. JAAHA 1977; 13: 605-8.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Grisneaux E, Dupuis J, Bonneau NH. Comparison of Ketoprofen and Carprofen in the treat-ment of chronic post-operative pain following femoral head and neck excision in dogs. 25th Annual Conference of the Veterinary Orthopeadic Society. Snowmass, Colorado, USA: February 1998: 19.
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Johnston SA, Steven MF. Mechanisms of action of anti-inflammatory medications used for the treatment of osteoarthritis. JAVMA 1997; 210: 1486-92.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Jones CJ, Budsberg SC. Physiologic characteristics and clinical importance of the cyclooxygenase isoforms in dogs and cats. JAVMA 2000; 217: 721-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Kay-Mugford P, Benn SJ, LaMarre J. In vitro effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs on cyclooxygenase activity in dogs. AJVR 2000; 61: 802-10.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Lefebvre HP, Laroute V, Alvineric M. The effect of experimental renal failure on Tolfenamic acid disposition in the dog. Biopharmaceutics and Drug Disposition 1997; 18: 79-91.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Lewis DD. Femoral head and neck excision and the controversy concerning adjunctive soft tissue interposition. Compend Contin Educ Pract Vet 1992; 14: 1463-72.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Lippincott CL. Femoral head and neck excision in the management of canine hip dysplasia. Vet Clin North Am 1992; 22: 721-39.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Mann FA, Tangner CH, Wagner-Mann C. A comparison of standard femoral head and neck excision and femoral head and neck excision using a biceps femoris muscle flap in the dog. Vet Surg 1987; 16: 223-30.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Mathews KA, Pettifer G, Foster R. Safety and efficacy of preoperative administration of meloxicam, compared with that of ketoprofen and butorphanol in dogs undergoing abdominal surgery. AJVR 2001; 62: 882-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McKellar QA, Lees P, Gettinby G. Pharmacodynamics of Tolfenamic acid in dogs. Evaluation of dose response relationships. European Journal of Pharmacology 1994; 253: 191-200.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 McLaughlin R, Tomlinson J. Alternative surgical treatments for canine hip dysplasia. Vet Medicine 1996; 91: 137-43.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Penwick RC. The variables that influence the success of femoral head and neck excision in dogs. Vet Medicine 1992; 87: 325-33.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Piermattei DL. An atlas of surgical approaches to the bones and joints of the dog and cat. 3rd edition. W.B. Saunders Co; 1993: 231-5.
    Google Scholar
  • 25 Planté J, Dupuis J, Beauregard G. Long-term results of conservative treatment, excision arthroplasty and triple pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia in the immature dog Part 1: Radiographic and physical results. Vet Comp Orthop. Traumatol 1997; 10: 101-10.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Planté J, Dupuis J, Beauregard G. Long-term results of conservative treatment, excision arthroplasty and triple pelvic osteotomy for the treatment of hip dysplasia in the immature dog Part 2: Analysis of the ground reaction forces. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1997; 10: 130-5.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Reimer ME, Johnston SA, Leib MS. The gastroduodenal effects of buffered aspirin, carprofen, and etodolac in healthy dogs. J Vet Inter Med 1999; 13: 472-7.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Remedios AM, Clayton HM, Skuba E. Femoral head excision arthroplasty using the vascularised rectus femoris muscle sling. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 1994; 07: 82-7.
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Renberg WC, Johnston SA, Ye K. Comparison of stance time and velocity as control variables in force plate analysis of dogs. AJVR 1999; 60: 814-9.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Ricketts AP, Lundy KM, Seibel SB. Evaluation of selective inhibition of canine cyclooxygenase 1 and 2 by carprofen and other nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. AJVR 1998; 59: 1441-6.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Rumph PF, Kincaid SA, Visco DM. Redistribution of vertical ground reaction force in dogs with experimentally induced chronic hindlimb lameness. Vet Surg 1995; 24: 384-9.
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Thomas E, Nahama A, Grandemange E. Efficacité d’un nouveau protocole d’utilisation de l’acide tolfénamique (Tolfédine ND) dans le traitement des affections douloureuses chroniques du chien: Résultats d’un essai terrain. Pract Méd Chir Anim Comp 1998; 33: 219-23.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Vetoquinol Canada Inc. Evaluation of Tolfenamic tablets field efficacy in the treatment of acute flare-ups of chronic locomotor disorders in dogs. Personal communication.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Vetoquinol Canada Inc. Package insert. Tolfedine tablets for dogs.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Wallace MS, Zawie DA, Garvey MS. Gastric ulceration in the dog secondary to the use of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. JAAHA 1990; 26: 467-72.
    PubMedGoogle Scholar