Clinical Judgment Revisited

Abstract

It is widely recognised that accessing and processing medical information in libraries and patient records is a burden beyond the capacities of the physician’s unaided mind in the conditions of medical practice. Physicians are quite capable of tremendous intellectual feats but cannot possibly do it all. The way ahead requires the development of a framework in which the brilliant pieces of understanding are routinely assembled into a working unit of social machinery that is coherent and as error free as possible – a challenge in which we ourselves are among the working parts to be organized and brought under control.

Such a framework of intellectual rigor and discipline in the practice of medicine can only be achieved if knowledge is embedded in tools; the system requiring the routine use of those tools in all decision making by both providers and patients.

Keywords

Decision Making - Knowledge Coupling - Clinical Judgment

• REFERENCES

• 1 Weed LL. Reengineering Medicine Federation Bulletin: J Med Licensure and Discipline. 1994; 81 (Suppl. 03) 149-83; 82 (1): 24-36.
• 2 Burger C. The Use of Problem Knowledge Couplers in a Primary Care Practice. HIMSS.; Forthcoming.:
• 3 Weaver RR. Clinical Uncertainty, Responsibility, and Change in Medical Practice: A Sociological Response to Weed’s Knowledge Coupling Innovation. Youngstown State University; Youngstown, Ohio: (In Press).
• 4 Becker HS, Geer B, Hughes EC, Strauss AL. Boys in White: Student Culture in Medical School. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1961
• 5 Fox R. “Training for Uncertainty,”. In: Merton RK, Reader G, Kendall PL. eds. The Student-Physician,. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1959
• 6 Freidson E. Profession of Medicine; A study of the sociology of applied knowledge. New York: Harper & Row Publishers; 1970
• 7 Light Jr D. Uncertainty and control in professional training. J Health Social Behav 1979; 20: 310-22.
• 8 Haas J, Shaffir W. Becoming Doctors: The Adoption of a Cloak of Competence. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1987
• 9 Lowenburg JS. Caring and Responsibility: The Crossroads Between Holistic Practice and Traditional Medicine. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press; 1989
• 10 Bower B. Seeing Through Expert Eyes, Science News,. July 18, 1998
• 11 Norman GR. Problem-solving skills, solving problems and problem-based learning. Med Educ 1988; 22: 279-80.
• 12 Weed CC. “Personal Communication”. Letter Sent to the editor of Science News’; [see 10].
• 13 Lawson I. Comments on the POMR. In: Driggs MF. ed. Problem-directed and medical Information Systems. New York: Intercontinental Medical Book Corporation; 1974
• 14 Pelikan J. The Idea of the University. Yale University Press; 1992: 17.
• 15 Dawes R. Rational Choice in an Uncertain World. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich; 1988: 143, 208, 216.
• 16 Bulger RJ. Hippocrates Revisited. MEDCOM, Inc; 1973
• 17 Tolstoy L. War and Peace. New York: Simon and Schuster; 1942
• 18 Sneath PHA, Sokal R. Numerical Taxonomy: The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman and Company; 1973
• 19 Bacon F. Novum Organum: Aphorisms Concerning the Interpretation of Nature and the Kingdom of Man, First Book, para 9 (1620). Encyclopedia Britannica; 1952. Volume 30.
• 20 Whitehead AN. An Introduction to Mathematics (London: Williams & Norgate, 1911), pg 61, Quoted. in Strachey C. “System Analysis in programming,” Computers and Computation Readings from Scientific American. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman & Co.; 1971