Semin intervent Radiol 2023; 40(03): 304-307
DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1769745
Review Article

Malposition of a Femoral Tunneled Dialysis Catheter through a Patent Foramen Ovale

Anthony Finnay Blackburn
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Gina P. Landinez
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
Robert K. Kerlan
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
,
R. Peter Lokken
1   Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, California
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a common congenital abnormality of high prevalence in adults. Its clinical significance is magnified in a right-to-left shunt, where paradoxical embolism can have catastrophic outcomes involving the brain, heart, mesenteric circulation, or extremities. Right-to-left shunting through a PFO is caused by increased right atrial pressure, as seen in the setting of pulmonary artery hypertension or pulmonary embolism. This case highlights the relevance of central venous catheter placement in the setting of a PFO. While the patient did not experience clinical sequelae from line placement, she was at high risk for paradoxical embolus. Recognizing the possibility of a PFO during central venous catheter placement, especially in the setting of increased right pressures, should be a consideration of all interventional radiologists.



Publication History

Article published online:
20 July 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Hagen PT, Scholz DG, Edwards WD. Incidence and size of patent foramen ovale during the first 10 decades of life: an autopsy study of 965 normal hearts. Mayo Clin Proc 1984; 59 (01) 17-20
  • 2 Kinney TB, Rose SC, Lim GW, Auger WR. Fatal paradoxic embolism occurring during IVC filter insertion in a patient with chronic pulmonary thromboembolic disease. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12 (06) 770-772
  • 3 Kouskov OS, Nichols DJ, O'Hearn DJ. Paradoxical arterial embolism involving both upper extremities in a patient with pulmonary embolism and a patent foramen ovale. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost 2011; 17 (06) E98-E101
  • 4 Cujec B, Polasek P, Mayers I, Johnson D. Positive end-expiratory pressure increases the right-to-left shunt in mechanically ventilated patients with patent foramen ovale. Ann Intern Med 1993; 119 (09) 887-894
  • 5 Chen WJ, Kuan P, Lien WP, Lin FY. Detection of patent foramen ovale by contrast transesophageal echocardiography. Chest 1992; 101 (06) 1515-1520
  • 6 Schneider B, Zienkiewicz T, Jansen V, Hofmann T, Noltenius H, Meinertz T. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography and correlation with autopsy findings. Am J Cardiol 1996; 77 (14) 1202-1209
  • 7 Porter TR, Abdelmoneim S, Belcik JT. et al. Guidelines for the cardiac sonographer in the performance of contrast echocardiography: a focused update from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2014; 27 (08) 797-810
  • 8 Pearson AC, Labovitz AJ, Tatineni S, Gomez CR. Superiority of transesophageal echocardiography in detecting cardiac source of embolism in patients with cerebral ischemia of uncertain etiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 1991; 17 (01) 66-72
  • 9 Zito C, Dattilo G, Oreto G. et al. Patent foramen ovale: comparison among diagnostic strategies in cryptogenic stroke and migraine. Echocardiography 2009; 26 (05) 495-503
  • 10 Lou J, Bao Y, Lv T, Yang Y. Computed tomography for detecting patent foramen ovale: a meta-analysis. Heart Surg Forum 2022; 25 (06) E849-E853
  • 11 Chick JF, Reddy SN, Bhatt RD, Shin BJ, Kirkpatrick JN, Trerotola SO. Significance of echocardiographically detected central venous catheter tip-associated thrombi. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2016; 27 (12) 1872-1877
  • 12 Ahn D, Brickner ME, Dowell J. Embolic stroke secondary to an indwelling catheter in a patient with a patent foramen ovale: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Adv Hematol Oncol 2012; 10 (05) 335-337
  • 13 Di Stefano V, Di Fulvio M, Di Liberato L, Onofrj M, De Angelis MV. Paradoxical embolism through a patent foramen ovale from central venous catheter thrombosis: a potential cause of stroke. J Neurol Sci 2020; 414: 116820
  • 14 Nwosu I, Ibeson E, Singh S. et al. Paradoxical thromboembolic ischemic stroke following tissue plasminogen activator instillation for clogged central venous dialysis catheter. Cureus 2021; 13 (12) e20346
  • 15 Lok CE, Huber TS, Lee T. et al; National Kidney Foundation. KDOQI clinical practice guideline for vascular access: 2019 update. Am J Kidney Dis 2020; 75 (4, Suppl 2): S1-S164
  • 16 Padsalgikar AD. Plastics in Medical Devices for Cardiovascular Applications. William Andrew, an Imprint of Elsevier; 2017
  • 17 Clark E, Kappel J, MacRae J. et al; Canadian Society of Nephrology Vascular Access Work Group. Practical aspects of nontunneled and tunneled hemodialysis catheters. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2016; 3: 2054358116669128
  • 18 Radhakrishnan Y, Dasari J, Anvari E, Vachharajani TJ. Tunneled femoral dialysis catheter: practical pointers. J Vasc Access 2021;11297298211039633:11297298211039633
  • 19 Bertoli SV, Ciurlino D, Musetti C. et al. Experience of 70-cm-long femoral tunnelled twin Tesio catheters for chronic haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2010; 25 (05) 1584-1588
  • 20 Zaleski GX, Funaki B, Lorenz JM. et al. Experience with tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999; 172 (02) 493-496
  • 21 Maya ID, Allon M. Outcomes of tunneled femoral hemodialysis catheters: comparison with internal jugular vein catheters. Kidney Int 2005; 68 (06) 2886-2889
  • 22 Batsis JA, Craici IM, Froehling DA. Central venous catheter thrombosis complicated by paradoxical embolism in a patient with diabetic ketoacidosis and respiratory failure. Neurocrit Care 2005; 2 (02) 185-188
  • 23 Yu AS, Levy E. Paradoxical cerebral air embolism from a hemodialysis catheter. Am J Kidney Dis 1997; 29 (03) 453-455
  • 24 Mathews S, Kodra A, El-Haddad H, Kliger CA. A case of paradoxical coil embolism through a patent foramen ovale. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2021; 32 (02) 312-314
  • 25 Gemmete JJ, Pandey AS, Chaudhary N, Potti TA. Paradoxical embolus to the brain from embolization of a carotid body tumor. J Neurointerv Surg 2012; 4 (04) e12
  • 26 Horowitz MB, Carrau R, Crammond D, Kanal E. Risks of tumor embolization in the presence of an unrecognized patent foramen ovale: case report. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002; 23 (06) 982-984
  • 27 Wu S, Ahmad I, Qayyum S, Wicky S, Kalva SP. Paradoxical embolism after declotting of hemodialysis fistulae/grafts in patients with patent foramen ovale. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 2011; 6 (06) 1333-1336
  • 28 Goldhaber SZ. Echocardiography in the management of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med 2002; 136 (09) 691-700
  • 29 Konstantinides S, Geibel A, Kasper W, Olschewski M, Blümel L, Just H. Patent foramen ovale is an important predictor of adverse outcome in patients with major pulmonary embolism. Circulation 1998; 97 (19) 1946-1951
  • 30 Miyake T, Obayashi O, Kanda A, Okada H, Ogura S, Kaneko K. Paradoxical embolization of the bilateral subclavian arteries after high tibial osteotomy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2019; 3 (08) e044