Homeopathy
DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1781448
Original Research Article

Assessing the Feasibility of a Two-Cohort Design to Assess the Potential of Homeopathic Medicinal Products to Reduce Antimicrobial Resistance in Turkeys (The HOMAMR Project)—Study Protocol

Silvia Baur-Bernhardt
1   Department Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
,
Annemarie Käsbohrer
2   Unit for Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
,
Marcus Georg Doherr
3   Department Veterinary Medicine, Institute for Veterinary Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
,
Diana Meemken
1   Department Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
,
Lena Sonnenschein-Swanson
1   Department Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
,
Birgit Ursula Stetina
4   Faculty of Psychology, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
,
Mary-Ann Sommer
1   Department Veterinary Medicine, Institute of Food Safety and Food Hygiene, Freie Universität, Berlin, Germany
,
Petra Weiermayer
2   Unit for Veterinary Public Health and Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Vienna, Austria
› Author Affiliations
Funding The project is partly funded by Stiftung Software AG, Darmstadt, and Sanddorf Stiftung, Regensburg, both Germany. The funders had or have no influence on the conduct, content, implementation or publication of the project.

Abstract

Background Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a serious public health concern worldwide. The European Union requires a reduction in the use of antibiotics by 50% by 2030, with separate regulations on organic production that give preference to homeopathy and phytotherapy in organic farms before the use of conventional medicines (including antibiotics). We have therefore designed a two-phased project whose overarching aim is to investigate the potential role of homeopathic medicinal products (HMPs) in combating AMR in turkeys (the HOMAMR project): a two-cohort feasibility study using turkey-farm data that have been collected and analyzed retrospectively, followed by a prospective two-cohort study in turkey farms that would examine the impact of HMPs on changing antibiotic use.

Objective The objective of this paper is to describe the protocol for the first phase of HOMAMR, which is a study under field conditions to assess the feasibility of collecting data retrospectively about turkeys that have been managed conventionally only or with HMPs.

Methods Surveys performed on farms in Germany and Austria, including interviews with consenting farmers, will determine the feasibility of comparing retrospectively gathered data on antibiotic use and performance/production data in two cohorts of turkeys: (1) homeopathic treatment with conventional care (antibiotics) added if necessary or (2) conventional care (antibiotics) only. Co-primary outcomes to be studied are the amount of antimicrobial use and production period-related mortality. In addition, other production/performance parameters will be compared between the two treated cohorts.

Conclusion To our knowledge, this is the first feasibility study on the treatment of turkeys using homeopathy, and whose retrospectively obtained data will inform a prospective study that would examine the impact of HMPs on antibiotic use in commercial turkey raising, fattening and breeding production.

Authors' Contributions

S.B.B., A.K., M.D., L.S.S., D.M., B.U.S., M.A.S. and P.W. made substantial contributions to the conception or design of the study. P.W., A.K., M.D., S.B.B., L.S.S., D.M., B.U.S. and M.A.S drafted the article or revised it critically for important intellectual content. A.K., M.D., D.M., P.W., S.B.B., B.U.S., L.S.S. and M.A.S. (all authors) gave final approval of the submitted manuscript. S.B.B., A.K., M.D., L.S.S., D.M., B.U.S., M.A.S. and P.W. (all authors) agree to be accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to the accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved.


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 24 July 2023

Accepted: 21 December 2023

Article published online:
04 April 2024

© 2024. Faculty of Homeopathy. This article is published by Thieme.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 
  • References

  • 1 Antimicrobial Resistance Collaborators. Global burden of bacterial antimicrobial resistance in 2019: a systematic analysis. Lancet 2022; 399: 629-655
  • 2 Smith DRM, Dolk FCK, Pouwels KB, Christie M, Robotham JV, Smieszek T. Defining the appropriateness and inappropriateness of antibiotic prescribing in primary care. J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73: ii11-ii18
  • 3 Berthe FCJ, Bouley T, Karesh W. et al. Operational framework for strengthening human, animal and environmental public health systems at their interface. Accessed May 25, 2023 at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/703711517234402168/Operational-framework-for-strengthening-human-animal-and-environmental-public-health-systems-at-their-interface
  • 4 Viñes J, Cuscó A, Napp S. et al. Transmission of similar Mcr-1 carrying plasmids among different Escherichia coli lineages isolated from livestock and the farmer. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10: 313
  • 5 Adisasmito WB, Almuhairi S, Behravesh CB. et al One Health: a new definition for a sustainable and healthy future. PLoS Pathog 2022; 18: e1010537
  • 6 Regulation (EU) 2018/848 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2018 on organic production and labelling of organic products and repealing Council Regulation (EC) No. 834/2007, 2018. Accessed June 15, 2022 at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018R0848&from=DE
  • 7 European Commission. European Green Deal. Organic farming – Action plan for the development of EU organic production, 2020. Accessed June 15, 2022 at: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52020DC0381
  • 8 Weiermayer P, Frass M, Peinbauer T, Ellinger L. [Evidence-based homeopathy and veterinary homeopathy, and its potential to help overcome the anti-microbial resistance problem—an overview]. Schweiz Arch Tierheilkd 2020; 162: 597-615
  • 9 European Commission. A European One Health Action Plan against Antimicrobial Resistance (AMR), 2017. Accessed June 15, 2022 at: https://ec.europa.eu/health/sites/default/files/antimicrobial_resistance/docs/amr_2017_action-plan.pdf
  • 10 Sedaghat P, Hubmann G, Frass M. The influence of homeopathic remedies on the immune system – a systematic review [Masters Thesis]. Publikationsdatenbank: FH Campus Wien; 2020: 73
  • 11 Bell IR. The complexity of the homeopathic healing response. Part 2: the role of the homeopathic simillimum as a complex system in initiating recovery from disease. Homeopathy 2020; 109: 51-64
  • 12 Mathie RT, Clausen J. Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised placebo-controlled trials. Vet Rec 2014; 175: 373-381
  • 13 Mathie RT, Clausen J. Veterinary homeopathy: systematic review of medical conditions studied by randomised trials controlled by other than placebo. BMC Vet Res 2015; 11: 236
  • 14 Mathie RT, Clausen J. Veterinary homeopathy: meta-analysis of randomised placebo-controlled trials. Homeopathy 2015; 104: 3-8
  • 15 Doehring C, Sundrum A. Efficacy of homeopathy in livestock according to peer-reviewed publications from 1981 to 2014. Vet Rec 2016; 179: 628
  • 16 Sato C, Listar VG, Bonamin LV. Development of broiler chickens after treatment with thymulin 5cH: a zoo technical approach. Homeopathy 2012; 101: 68-73
  • 17 Hadipour MM, Habibi GH, Ghorashine A, Olyaie A, Torki M. Evaluation of the homeopathic remedies medication on commercial broiler chickens performance. J Anim Vet Adv 2011; 10: 2102-2105
  • 18 Berchieri Jr A, Turco WC, Paiva JB, Oliveira GH, Sterzo EV. Evaluation of isopathic treatment of Salmonella enteritidis in poultry. Homeopathy 2006; 95: 94-97
  • 19 Sandoval CH, Morfin LL, Lopez BB. Preliminary research for testing Baptisia tinctoria 30c effectiveness against salmonellosis in first and second quality broiler chickens. Br Homeopath J 1998; 87: 131-134
  • 20 Velkers FC, te Loo AJ, Madin F, van Eck JH. Isopathic and pluralist homeopathic treatment of commercial broilers with experimentally induced colibacillosis. Res Vet Sci 2005; 78: 77-83
  • 21 Amalcaburio R, Filho L, Honorato LA, Menezes NA. Homeopathic remedies in a semi-intensive alternative system of broiler production. Int J High Dilution Res 2009; 8: 33-39
  • 22 Weiermayer P, Frass M, Fibert P, Klein-Laansma C, Ulbrich-Zürni S. Recommendations for designing, conducting and reporting clinical observational studies in homeopathic veterinary medicine. Homeopathy 2023; 112: 226-239
  • 23 Kemper CJ, Beierlein C, Kovaleva A, Rammstedt B. . Eine Kurzskala zur Messung von Optimismus-Pessimismus Die Skala Optimismus-Perssimismus-2 (SOP2), 2012. Accessed December 2, 2023 at: https://www.gesis.org/fileadmin/kurzskalen/working_papers/SOP2_Workingpaper.pdf
  • 24 Jerusalem M, Schwarzer R. . SWE – Skala zur allgemeinen Selbstverwirklichung [Verfahrensdokumentation, Autorenbeschreibung und Fragebogen], 2003. Accessed February 12, 2023 at: https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.4515
  • 25 Junghans A, Deseniß L, Louton H. Data evaluation of broiler chicken rearing and slaughter—An exploratory study. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9: 957786
  • 26 European Commission. Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/627 of 15 March 2019 laying down uniform practical arrangements for the performance of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No. 2074/2005 as regards official controls. Official Journal of the European Union: L 131/51
  • 27 Aksoy T, Çürek Dİ, Narinç D, Önenç A. Effects of season, genotype, and rearing system on broiler chickens raised in different semi-intensive systems: performance, mortality, and slaughter results. Trop Anim Health Prod 2021; 53: 189
  • 28 Ferrante V, Lolli S, Ferrari L. et al. Differences in prevalence of welfare indicators in male and female turkey flocks (Meleagris gallopavo). Poult Sci 2019; 98: 1568-1574
  • 29 Zhang XX, Zhang T, Fang HH. Antibiotic resistance genes in water environment. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2009; 82: 397-414
  • 30 Dunlop MW, Moss AF, Groves PJ, Wilkinson SJ, Stuetz RM, Selle PH. The multidimensional causal factors of 'wet litter' in chicken-meat production. Sci Total Environ 2016; 562: 766-776
  • 31 Iannetti L, Romagnoli S, Cotturone G, Podaliri Vulpiani M. Animal welfare assessment in antibiotic-free and conventional broiler chicken. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11: 2822
  • 32 Jeni RE, Dittoe DK, Olson EG. et al. An overview of health challenges in alternative poultry production systems. Poult Sci 2021; 100: 101173
  • 33 Schwartzkopf-Genswein KS, Faucitano L, Dadgar S, Shand P, González LA, Crowe TG. Road transport of cattle, swine and poultry in North America and its impact on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality: a review. Meat Sci 2012; 92: 227-243
  • 34 Björkman I, Röing M, Sternberg Lewerin S, Stålsby Lundborg C, Eriksen J. Animal production with restrictive use of antibiotics to contain antimicrobial resistance in Sweden—a qualitative study. Front Vet Sci 2021; 7: 619030
  • 35 Goel A. Heat stress management in poultry. J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) 2021; 105: 1136-1145
  • 36 Mulchandani R, Wang Y, Gilbert M, Van Boeckel TP. Global trends in antimicrobial use in food-producing animals: 2020 to 2030. PLOS Glob Public Health 2023; 3: e0001305
  • 37 Castro J, Barros MM, Araújo D. et al. Swine enteric colibacillosis: current treatment avenues and future directions. Front Vet Sci 2022; 9: 981207
  • 38 Camerlink I, Ellinger L, Bakker EJ, Lantinga EA. Homeopathy as replacement to antibiotics in the case of Escherichia coli diarrhoea in neonatal piglets. Homeopathy 2010; 99: 57-62
  • 39 Low CX, Tan LTH, Ab Mutalib NS. et al. Unveiling the impact of antibiotics and alternative methods for animal husbandry: a review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10: 578
  • 40 Nair MNB, Punniamurthy N, Kumar S. Ethno-veterinary practices for animal health and the associated medicinal plants from 24 locations in 10 states of India. Res Rev J Vet Sci 2017; 16-25
  • 41 Zeise J, Fritz J. Use and efficacy of homeopathy in prevention and treatment of bovine mastitis. Open Agric 2019; 4: 203-212
  • 42 Baars EW, Zoen EB, Breitkreuz T. et al. The contribution of complementary and alternative medicine to reduce antibiotic use: a narrative review of health concepts, prevention, and treatment strategies. Evid Based Complement Alternat Med 2019; 2019: 5365608
  • 43 Maeschli A, Schmidt A, Ammann W, Schurtenberger P, Maurer E, Walkenhorst M. [Einfluss eines komplementärmedizinischen telefonischen Beratungssystems auf den Antibiotikaeinsatz bei Nutztieren in der Schweiz]. Complement Med Res 2019; 26: 174-181
  • 44 Sommer M-A. Epidemiologische Untersuchung zur Tiergesundheit in Schweinezuchtbetrieben unter besonderer Berücksichtigung von Managementfaktoren und des Einsatzes von Antibiotika und Homöopathika. Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover; 2009
  • 45 Stevens M, Piepers S, De Vliegher S. Mastitis prevention and control practices and mastitis treatment strategies associated with the consumption of (critically important) antimicrobials on dairy herds in Flanders, Belgium. J Dairy Sci 2016; 99: 2896-2903
  • 46 Porzsolt F, Rocha NG, Toledo-Arruda AC. et al. Efficacy and effectiveness trials have different goals, use different tools, and generate different messages. Pragmat Obs Res 2015; 6: 47-54