Plant Biol (Stuttg) 1999; 1(4): 460-470
DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-978540
Original Papers

© Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart · New York

Comparison of Photosynthetic Responses of the Sympatric Tropical C3 Species Clusia multiflora H. B. K. and the C3-CAM Intermediate Species Clusia minor L. to Irradiance and Drought Stress in a Phytotron*

Britta Herzog1 , Susanne Hoffmann2 , W. Hartung3 , U. Lüttge1
  • 1Institute of Botany, Darmstadt University of Technology, Darmstadt, Germany
  • 2GSF-National Research Center of Environment and Health, Exposure Chamber Group, Neuherberg, Germany
  • 3Julius-von-Sachs-Institut für Biowissenschaften, Lehrstuhl Botanik I, Universität Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
* Dedicated to Dr. H.-D. Payer on the occasion of his 60th birthday.
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

1998

1999

Publikationsdatum:
19. April 2007 (online)

Abstract

Clusia multiflora H. B. K., an obligate C3 species and Clusia minor L. a C3/CAM intermediate species, are two physio-types of a similar morphotype. They can sympatrically occupy secondary savanna sites exposed to high insolation in the tropics. In C. multiflora severe stress, i.e., switching shade-grown plants to high light plus drought, resulted in leaves browning or yellowing and becoming necrotic. However, in long-term light stress C. multiflora was able to grow new leaves with their photosynthetic apparatus fit for high light conditions. Shade-grown C. minor readily overcame switching to high light conditions and drought, responding by a rapid change from C3 photosynthesis to CAM. Decreasing ψsoil led to increased abscisic acid levels in the leaves of C. minor, however CAM induction was not directly related to this and was mainly determined by increased PPFD. Both species were capable of rapid accumulation of zeaxanthin for acute photoprotection following high PPFD exposure. The maximum capacity for zeaxanthin accumulation was larger in C. minor, but under steady high PPFD it only partially made use of this capacity, relying on high internal CO2 concentrations of Phase III of CAM, in addition to zeaxanthin, for acute photo-protection. Thus, by different means the two species perform well under high light conditions. However, C. multiflora needs time for development of adapted leaves under such stress conditions while the more flexible C. minor can readily switch from low light to high light conditions.