Download PDF
Aktuelle Neurologie 2008; 35(8): 399-404
DOI: 10.1055/s-2008-1067528
Übersicht

© Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York

„Massed practice” in der motorischen Rehabilitation: Der Schlüssel zum Erfolg?

„Massed Practice” a Prerequisite for Neurorehabilitation?C.  Renner1 , H.  Hummelsheim1
  • 1Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum, Universität Leipzig
Further Information

Publication History

Publication Date:
23 September 2008 (online)

Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Einleitung

In Deutschland erleiden jährlich über 200 000 Menschen einen Schlaganfall. Entsprechend den errechneten Erwartungen des Erlanger Schlaganfallregisters wird die Anzahl der Schlaganfallüberlebenden in den nächsten 2 Dekaden kontinuierlich wachsen, was einerseits der alternden Bevölkerung und andererseits der sinkenden Schlaganfallmortalitätsrate zuzuschreiben ist [1]. Trotz verbesserter Notfall- und Akutbehandlung führen Schlaganfälle zu erheblichen motorischen Einschränkungen, die sich auf die Teilhabe in der Gesellschaft auswirken. Ziel der neurologischen Rehabilitation ist die Selbstständigkeit des Patienten so weit wie möglich wiederherzustellen. In der motorischen Rehabilitation bildet die Selbstständigkeit in den Aktivitäten des täglichen Lebens (ADLs) sowie die Mobilität das Kernstück für ergotherapeutische und physiotherapeutische Übungsbehandlungen. Wichtig ist dabei, dass nicht irgendeine Behandlung angewandt wird, sondern eine mit wissenschaftlicher Evidenz.

Literatur

  • 1 Kolominsky-Rabas P L, Heuschmann P U, Marschakk D. et al . Lifetime costs of ischemic stroke in Germany: Results and national projections from a population-based stroke registry.  Stroke. 2006;  37 1179-1183
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Carr J H, Shepherd R B. Stroke rehabilitation guidelines for exercise and training tooptimize motor skill. Oxford; Butterworth Heinemann 2003
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Langhammer B, Stanghelle J K. Bobath or motor relearning programme? A comparison of two different approaches of physiotherapy in stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled study.  Clin Rehabil. 2000;  14 361-369
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Bütefisch C, Hummelsheim H, Denzler P. et al . Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand.  J Neurol Sci. 1995;  130 59-68
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Asanuma H, Keller A. Neuronal mechanisms of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1991;  2 217-224
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Asanuma H, Pavlides C. Neurobiological basis of motor learning in mammals.  Neuroreport. 1997;  8 i-vi
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Van Peppen R P, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S. et al . The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence?.  ClinRehabil. 2004;  18 833-862
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Kwakkel G, Wagenaar R C, Koelman T W. et al . Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke.  Stroke. 1997;  28 1550-1556
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Kraemer W J, Ratamess N A. Fundamentals of resistance training: progression and exercise prescription.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;  36 674-688
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Delecluse C, Colman V, Roelants M. et al . Exercise programs for older men: mode and intensity to induce the highest possible health-related benefits.  Prev Med. 2004;  39 823-833
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Wood R H, Reyes R, Welsch M A. et al . Concurrent cardiovascular and resistance training in healthy older adults.  Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2001;  33 1751-1758
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Elbert T, Pantev C, Wienbruch C. et al . Increased cortical representation of the fingers of the left hand in string players.  Science. 1995;  270 305-307
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Gaser C, Schlaug G. Brain Structures Differ between Musicians and Non-Musicians.  J Neurosci. 2003;  23 9240-9245
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Matthews P M, Johansen-Berg H, Reddy H. Non-invasive mapping of brain functions and brain recovery: applying lessons from cognitive neuroscience to neurorehabilitation.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2004;  22 245-260
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Taub E. Somatosensory deafferentation research with monkeys: implications for rehabilitation medicine. In: Ince L, ed Behavioral Psychology in Rehabilitation Medicine: Clinical Applications. Baltimore, Md; Williams & Wilkins 1980: 371-401
    Google Scholar
  • 16 Wolf S L, Lecraw D E, Barton L A. et al . Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned non-use among chronic stroke and head injured patients.  Exp Neurol. 1989;  104 125-132
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Taub E, Miller N E, Novack T A. et al . Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;  74 347-354
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Miltner W H, Bauder H, Sommer M. et al . Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: a replication.  Stroke. 1999;  30 586-592
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Van der Lee J H, Wagenaar R C, Lankhorst G J. et al . Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: results from a single-blind randomized clinical trial.  Stroke. 1999;  30 2369-2375
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Page S J, Sisto S, Levine P. et al . Efficacy of modified constraint-induced movement therapy in chronic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;  85 14-18
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P. et al . Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial.  JAMA. 2006;  296 2095-2104
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dromerick A W, Edwards D F, Hahn M. Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke?.  Stroke. 2000;  31 2984-2988
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Page S J, Sisto S, Johnston M V. et al . Modified constraint-induced therapy after subacute stroke: a preliminary study.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2002;  16 290-295
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Wolf S L, Winstein C J, Miller J P. et al . Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial.  Lancet Neurol. 2008;  7 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I. et al . Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemiparesis: an exploratory study.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;  83 1374-1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Van der Lee J H. Constraint-induced therapy for stroke: more of the same or something completely different?.  Current opinion in Neurology. 2001;  14 741-744
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Brogardh C, Sjölund B H. Constraint-induced movement therapy in patients with stroke: a pilot study on effects of small group training and of extended mitt use.  Clinical Rehabil. 2006;  20 218-227
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Platz T, Winter T, Muller N. et al . Arm ability training for stroke and traumatic brain injury patients with mild arm paresis: a single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;  82 961-968
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Hogan N, Krebs H I, Charnarong J. et al .Interactive robotics therapist. Cambridge, Massachusetts; Institute of Technology US Patent No. 5 466 213 1995
    Google Scholar
  • 30 Aisen M L, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke.  Arch Neurol. 1997;  54 443-446
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Volpe B T, Krebs H I, Hogan N. et al . A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation.  Neurology. 2000;  54 1938-1944
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Fasoli S E, Krebs H I, Stein J. et al . Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;  84 477-482
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Lum P S, Burgar C G, Kenney D E. et al . Robot-assisted movement training compared with conventional therapy techniques for the rehabilitation of upper limb motor function following stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2002;  83 952-959
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hesse S, Werner C, Pohl M. et al . Computerized arm training improves the motor control of the severely affected arm after stoke.  Stroke. 2005;  36 1960-1966
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Masiero S, Celia A, Rosati G. et al . Robotic-assisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;  88 142-149
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Kahn L E, Zygman M L, Rymer W Z. et al . Robot assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.  Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2006;  3 1-13
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Barker R N, Brauer S G, Carson R G. Training of reaching in stroke survivors with severe and chronic upper limb paresis using a novel nonrobotic device.  Stroke. 2008;  39 1800-1807
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke M T. et al . Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients.  Stroke. 1995;  26 976-981
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 39 Hesse S, Konrad M, Uhlenbrock D. Treadmill walking with partial body weight support versus floor walking in hemiparetic subjects.  Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;  80 421-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 40 Kosak M C, Reding M J. Comparison of partial body weight-supported treadmill gait training versus aggressive bracing assisted walking post stroke.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2000;  14 13-19
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 41 Nilsson L, Carlsson J, Danielsson A. et al . Walking training of patients with hemiparesis at an early stage after stroke: a comparison of walking training on a treadmill with body weight support and walking training on the ground.  Clin Rehabil. 2001;  15 515-527
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 42 Pohl M, Mehrholz J, Ritschel C. et al . Speed-dependent treadmill training in ambulatory hemiparetic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial.  Stroke. 2002;  33 553-558
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 43 Colombo G, Joerg M, Schreier R. et al . Treadmill training of paraplegic patients using a robotic orthosis.  J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;  37 313-319
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 44 Husemann B, Mueller F, Krewer C. et al . Effects of locomotion training with assistance of a robot-driven gait orthosis in hemiparetic patientsafter stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study.  Stroke. 2007;  38 349-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 45 Pohl M, Werner C, Holzgraefe M. et al . Repetitive locomotor training and physiotherapy improve walking and basic activities of daily living after stroke: a single-blind, randomized multicentre trial (DEutsche GAngtrainerStudie, DEGAS).  Clinical Rehabilitation. 2007;  21 17-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 46 Thaut M H, McIntosh G C, Rice R R. Rhythmic facilitation of gait training in hemiparetic stroke rehabilitation.  J Neurol Sci. 1997;  151 207-212
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 47 Thaut M H, Leins A K, Rice R R. et al . Rhythmic auditory stimulation improves gait more than NDT/Bobath training in near-ambulatory patients early post stroke: a single-blind, randomized trial.  Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2007;  21 455-459
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 48 Sullivan K J, Brown D A, Klassen T. et al, for the Physical Therapy Clinical Research Network (PTClinRes-Net) . Effects of task-specific locomotor and strength in training ambulatory adults after stroke: results of the STEPS randomized clinical trial.  Phys Ther. 2007;  87 2-17
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 49 Hunter G R, McCarthy J P, Bamman M M. Effects of resistance training on older adults.  Sports Med. 2004;  34 329-348
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 50 Sterr A, Freivogel S. Intensive training in chronic upper limb hemiparesis does not increase spasticity or synergies.  Neurology. 2004;  63 2176-2177
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 51 Cristea M C, Levin M F. Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke.  Brain. 2000;  123 940-953
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 52 Kim C M, Eng J J. Magnitude and pattern of 3D kinematic and kinetic gait profiles in persons with stroke: relationship to walking speed.  Gait Posture. 2004;  20 140-146
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 53 McCrea P H, Eng J J, Hodgson A J. Saturated muscle activation contributes to compensatory reaching strategies after stroke.  J Neurophysiol. 2005;  94 2999-3008
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 54 Neckel N, Pelliccio M, Nichols D. et al . Quantification of functional weakness and abnormal synergy patterns in the lower limb of individuals with chronic stroke.  Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation. 2006;  3 17
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 55 Dipietro L, Krebs H I, Fasoli S E. et al . Changing motor synergies in chronic stroke.  J Neurophysiol. 2007;  98 757-768
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 56 Woodlee M T, Schallert T. The interplay between behaviour and neurodegeneration in rat models of Parkinson's disease and stroke.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2004;  22 153-161
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 57 Cramer S C. Changes in motor system function and recovery after stroke.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2004;  22 231-238
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 58 Nelles G. Cortical reorganization – effects of intensive therapy, results from prospective functional imaging studies.  Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience. 2004;  22 239-244
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 59 Plautz E J, Milliken G W, Nudo R J. Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult squirrel monkeys: role of use versus learning.  Neurobiol Learn Mem. 2000;  74 27-55
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 60 Vearrier L A, Langan J, Shunway-Cook A. et al . An intensive massed practice approach to retraining balance post-stroke.  Gait&Posture. 2005;  22 154-163
    PubMedGoogle Scholar

Dr. Caroline Renner

Neurologisches Rehabilitationszentrum, Universität Leipzig

Muldentalweg 1

04828 Bennewitz

Email: renner@sachsenklinik.de

      >