Thromb Haemost 2011; 105(02): 245-253
DOI: 10.1160/TH10-08-0552
Blood Coagulation, Fibrinolysis and Cellular Haemostasis
Schattauer GmbH

Apixaban versus enoxaparin in patients with total knee arthroplasty

A meta-analysis of randomised trials
Jiahao Huang
1   Center of Evidence Based Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R.China
,
Yunfei Cao
1   Center of Evidence Based Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R.China
,
Cun Liao
1   Center of Evidence Based Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R.China
,
Liucheng Wu
1   Center of Evidence Based Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R.China
,
Feng Gao
1   Center of Evidence Based Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital, Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, Guangxi, P.R.China
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 26 August 2010

Accepted after minor revision: 23 September 2010

Publication Date:
25 November 2017 (online)

Summary

It was the objective of this study to systematically compare the effects of apixaban versus enoxaparin in patients following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). A systematic search of Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted. Eligible studies were prospective, randomised control trials (RCT) of apixaban therapy, comparing with enoxaparin, in patients who have a high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after TKA. Three RCTs involving 7,337 individuals were identified, of whom 4,057 were treated with apixaban 2.5 mg once daily, and 3280 were subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg once-daily or 30 mg twice-daily). Meta-analysis demonstrated the odds ratio (OR) for the composite of major VTE (proximal deep-vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism) for apixaban versus enoxaparin was 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27 to 0.82, 0.6% vs. 1.2%) and 2.09 (95%CI: 0.99 to 4.45, 0.6% vs. 0.3%), respectively. All-cause mortality occurred in 0.2% of the apixaban group versus 0.09% of the enoxaparin group (OR=1.74; 95%CI, 0.51 to 5.95). With respect to safety outcomes, apixaban was associated with a lower major bleeding rate than enoxaparin (OR=0.55, 95%CI: 0.32 to 0.96). No significant differences were detected between two strategies in other endpoints of safety profile analysed: clinically relevant non-major bleeding, raised hepatic transaminase enzyme or bilirubin concentrations and arterial thromboembolic events. In conclusion, apixaban is non-inferior to subcutaneous enoxaparin when used for the same duration, with considerable advantage regarding safety profile of major bleeding after TKA.

 
  • References

  • 1 Geerts WH, Bergqvist D, Pineo GF. et al. Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest 2008; 133: 381S-453S.
  • 2 Wolowacz SE, Roskell NS, Plumb JM. et al. Efficacy and safety of dabigatran etexilate for the prevention of venous thromboembolism following total hip or knee arthroplasty. A meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 77-85.
  • 3 He K, He B, Grace JE. et al. Preclinical pharmacokinetics and metabolism of apixaban, a potent and selective factor Xa inhibitor. Blood. 2006 108: 273a (Abstract 910).
  • 4 Jiang X, Crain EJ, Luettgen JM. et al. Apixaban, an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor, inhibits human clot-bound factor Xa activity in vitro. Thromb Haemost 2009; 101: 780-782.
  • 5 Weitz JI. New oral anticoagulants in development. Thromb Haemost 2010; 103: 62-70.
  • 6 Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1 [updated September 2008]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008.
  • 7 The European Agency for the Evaluation of Medicinal Products, Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP).. Guideline on clinical investigation of medicinal products for prophylaxis of high intra- and post-operative venous thromboembolic risk. Available at: http://www.emea.europa.eu/pdfs/human/ewp/70798en_fin.pdf Accessed Dec 1, 2009.
  • 8 Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A. et al. Apixaban or enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement. N Engl J Med 2009; 361: 594-604.
  • 9 Sutton AJ, Abrams KR. Methods for meta-analysis in medical research. Wiley; Chichester: 2000
  • 10 Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M. et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. Br Med J 1997; 315: 629-634.
  • 11 Begg CB, Mazumdar M. Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias. Biometrics 1994; 50: 1088-1101.
  • 12 Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S. et al. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 1999; 354: 1896-1900.
  • 13 Lassen MR, Raskob GE, Gallus A. et al. Apixaban versus enoxaparin for thromboprophylaxis after knee replacement (ADVANCE-2): a randomised double-blind trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 807-815.
  • 14 Lassen MR, Davidson BL, Gallus A. et al. The efficacy and safety of apixaban, an oral, direct factor Xa inhibitor, as thromboprophylaxis in patients following total knee replacement. J Thromb Haemost 2007; 5: 2368-2375.