Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2013; 26(06): 489-492
DOI: 10.3415/VCOT-12-01-0016
Brief Communication
Schattauer GmbH

Area of cartilage accessible to curettage for subsequent arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint

Comparison of conventional and collateral ligament sparing approaches
J. M. Kuemmerle
1   Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
,
S. Berchtold
1   Equine Hospital, Vetsuisse Faculty, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

Received: 23 January 2013

Accepted: 27 June 2013

Publication Date:
04 January 2018 (online)

Summary

This study compared the areas of cartilage accessible for curettage in arthrodesis of the equine proximal interphalangeal joint using the conventional and collateral ligament sparing approaches. For this purpose, forelimbs and hindlimbs of six equine cadavers without radiographic evidence of proximal interphalangeal joint disease were used. One limb of each pair of limbs was randomly assigned to a dissection using a standard approach to the proximal interphalangeal joint including transection of the collateral ligaments, while each contralateral limb was exposed using the same approach but leaving the collateral ligaments intact. Hohmann retractors and Spratt curettes were then used to remove as much articular cartilage as possible. Finally, proximal interphalangeal joints were photographed and image analysis was performed.

Using the collateral ligament sparing procedure, the mean percentage of articular cartilage surface removed (41.2%) was significantly less than using the conventional procedure (79.6%) (p <0.01). The difference between forelimbs and hindlimbs was not significant.

 
  • References

  • 1 Lischer CJ, Auer JA. Arthrodesis techniques. In: Auer JA, Stick JA. editors. Equine Surgery. St. Louis: Saunders Elsevier; 2012. p. 2012-1132.
  • 2 Bras JJ, Lillich JD, Beard WL. et al. Effect of a collateral ligament sparing surgical approach on mechanical properties of equine proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis constructs. Vet Surg 2011; 40: 73-81.
  • 3 Jones P, Delco M, Beard W. et al. A limited surgical approach for pastern arthrodesis in horses with severe osteoarthritis. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2009; 22: 303-308.
  • 4 Zubrod CJ, Schneider RK, Hague BA. et al. Comparison of three methods for arthrodesis of the distal intertarsal and tarsometatarsal joints in horses. Vet Surg 2005; 34: 372-382.
  • 5 Watts AE, Fortier LA, Nixon AJ. et al. A technique for laser-facilitated equine pastern arthrodesis using parallel screws inserted in lag fashion. Vet Surg 2010; 39: 244-253.
  • 6 Easter JL, Schumacher J, Watkins JP. Transfixation cast technique for arthrodesis of the distal interphalangeal joint of horses. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol 2011; 24: 62-67.
  • 7 Lauge-Pedersen H, Aspenberg P. Synovial fluid depletion: successful arthrodesis without operative cartilage removal. J Orthop Sci 2003; 8: 591-595.