Download PDF
J Wrist Surg 2019; 08(01): 018-023
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1667305
Scientific Article
Thieme Medical Publishers 333 Seventh Avenue, New York, NY 10001, USA.

Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis for Extra-articular Distal Radius Fracture in Postmenopausal Women: Longitudinal versus Transverse Incision

Chloé Galmiche
1   Department of Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, France
,
Gustavo Gómez Rodríguez
2   Centro Artro, Clinic of the Hand of Buenos Aires, British Hospital of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
,
Fred Xavier
3   Department of Spine Surgery, QEII Health Sciences Centre – Halifax Infirmary, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
,
Yuka Igeta
4   Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
,
Juan José Hidalgo Diaz
1   Department of Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, France
,
Philippe Liverneaux
1   Department of Hand Surgery, University Hospital of Strasbourg, Fédération de Médecine Translationnelle de Strasbourg, University of Strasbourg, Illkirch, France
› Author Affiliations
Further Information

Publication History

20 November 2017

15 June 2018

Publication Date:
07 August 2018 (online)

    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Background This work aimed to compare two mini-invasive palmar approaches (longitudinal and transverse) to osteosynthesize fractures of the distal radius. The main hypothesis was that the longitudinal technique gave smaller incisions. The secondary hypothesis was that the longitudinal technique would be better for the recovery of pain, functional scores, strength, and mobility.

Materials and Methods The series included 30 extra-articular distal radius fractures in 30 patients (average age: 74 years) fixed with volar locking plate using a mini-invasive technique. Fifteen of these patients had a single longitudinal surgical approach (Group I), and 15 had a transverse approach that was completed with a longitudinal incision for the proximal screws (Group II).

Results The combined average incision size was 14.73 mm in Group I and 19.8 mm in Group II. After 6 months, the pain was on average 1.4/10 (Group I) and 0.46/10 (Group II), the quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand was 13.63/100 (Group I) and 2.8/100 (Group II), Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation was 11.8/100 (Group I) and 5.97/100 (Group II), grip strength was 81.06% (Group I) and 72.13% (Group II), flexion was 88.13% (Group I) and 75% (Group II), extension was 86% (Group I) and 64.6% (Group II), ulnar inclination was 89% (Group I) and 78.67% (Group II), radial inclination was 89.73% (Group I) and 79.93% (Group II), pronation was 96.67% (Group I) and 81.46% (Group II), and supination was 91.93% (Group I) and 79.87% (Group II).

Clinical Relevance The longitudinal technique gave smaller incisions than the transverse technique. Among the secondary hypotheses, all the variables were better with the longitudinal technique, except the pain, although without any significant difference.

Keywords

distal radius fracture - minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis - postmenopausal
 

  • References

  • 1 Scuderi GR, Tria AJ. Minimally Invasive Surgery in Orthopedics. Heidelberg: Springer; 2010: 694
    Google Scholar
  • 2 Konstantinidis L, Helwig P, Seifert J. , et al. Internal fixation of dorsally comminuted fractures of the distal part of the radius: a biomechanical analysis of volar plate and intramedullary nail fracture stability. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2011; 131 (11) 1529-1537
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Orbay J. Volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures. Hand Clin 2005; 21 (03) 347-354
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gradl G, Mielsch N, Wendt M. , et al. Intramedullary nail versus volar plate fixation of extra-articular distal radius fractures. Two year results of a prospective randomized trial. Injury 2014; 45 (01) (Suppl. 01) S3-S8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Zenke Y, Sakai A, Oshige T. , et al. Clinical results of volar locking plate for distal radius fractures: conventional versus minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis. J Orthop Trauma 2011; 25 (07) 425-431
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Abe Y, Yoshida K, Tominaga Y. Less invasive surgery with wrist arthroscopy for distal radius fracture. J Orthop Sci 2013; 18 (03) 398-404
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Yoshikawa Y, Saito T, Matsui H. A new cosmetic approach for volar fixed-angle plate fixation to treat distal radius fractures. J Jpn Soc Surg Hand. 2008; 24: 889-893
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Zemirline A, Naito K, Lebailly F, Facca S, Liverneaux P. Distal radius fixation through a mini-invasive approach of 15 mm. Part 1: feasibility study. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 2014; 24 (06) 1031-1037
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Gummesson C, Ward MM, Atroshi I. The shortened disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (QuickDASH): validity and reliability based on responses within the full-length DASH. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2006; 7: 44
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, Beadle M, Roth JH. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma 1998; 12 (08) 577-586
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Burkhart KJ, Nowak TE, Gradl G. , et al. Intramedullary nailing vs. palmar locked plating for unstable dorsally comminuted distal radius fractures: a biomechanical study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2010; 25 (08) 771-775
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Chappuis J, Bouté P, Putz P. Dorsally displaced extra-articular distal radius fractures fixation: dorsal IM nailing versus volar plating. A randomized controlled trial. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2011; 97 (05) 471-478
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Zehir S, Calbiyik M, Zehir R, Ipek D. Intramedullary repair device against volar plating in the reconstruction of extra-articular and simple articular distal radius fractures; a randomized pilot study. Int Orthop 2014; 38 (08) 1655-1660
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Orbay JL, Touhami A, Orbay C. Fixed angle fixation of distal radius fractures through a minimally invasive approach. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2005; 9 (03) 142-148
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Lattmann T, Dietrich M, Meier C, Kilgus M, Platz A. Comparison of 2 surgical approaches for volar locking plate osteosynthesis of the distal radius. J Hand Surg Am 2008; 33 (07) 1135-1143
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Duncan SF, Weiland AJ. Minimally invasive reduction and osteosynthesis of articular fractures of the distal radius. Injury 2001; 32 (Suppl. 01) SA14-SA24
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Imatani J, Noda T, Morito Y, Sato T, Hashizume H, Inoue H. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for comminuted fractures of the metaphysis of the radius. J Hand Surg [Br] 2005; 30 (02) 220-225
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Rey PB, Rochet S, Loisel F, Obert L. Technical note: how to spare the pronator quadratus during MIPO of distal radius fractures by using a mini-volar plate. Chir Main 2014; 33 (02) 95-99
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Lee JC, Lim J, Chacha PB. The anatomical basis of the vascularized pronator quadratus pedicled bone graft. J Hand Surg [Br] 1997; 22 (05) 644-646
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Annis RS. Pronator quadratus - a forgotten muscle: a case report. J Can Chiropr Assoc 2003; 47: 17-20
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 McConkey MO, Schwab TD, Travlos A, Oxland TR, Goetz T. Quantification of pronator quadratus contribution to isometric pronation torque of the forearm. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34 (09) 1612-1617
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Wei XM, Sun ZZ, Rui YJ, Song XJ. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for distal radius fractures. Indian J Orthop 2014; 48 (01) 20-24
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Pire E, Hidalgo Diaz JJ, Salazar Botero S, Facca S, Liverneaux PA. Long volar plating for metadiaphyseal fractures of distal radius: study comparing minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis versus conventional approach. J Wrist Surg 2017; 6 (03) 227-234
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar