Outcome of index finger pollicisation

Abstract

Background

Pollicisation of the index finger for absence or severe hypoplasia of the thumb has been reported as a good procedure to recreate a new ‘thumb’ with good cosmesis and acceptable function. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the outcome of our series from different viewpoints.

Methods

Seventeen patients with 24 involved hands were willing to come back for evaluation. The mean age at operation was 12 months. In 8 hands there was also a radial club hand. Buck Gramcko’s technique was used with slight modifications. The mean follow-up time was 53 months (ranging from 6 to 142). The outcome was determined in a variety of ways: the functional assessment, cosmesis (objectivated with measurement of thumb length, girth and nail size) and a subjective evaluation of function and aspect done with a patient/parent questionnaire and a visual analogue score.

Results

The mean functional score was: one excellent, eleven good, five fair and five poor results. The mean length was 96% the width was 93%, the nail width was 85%. There was no significant different outcome in the syndrome related thumbs versus the isolated cases, unilateral versus bilateral cases. A significant worse outcome was seen for function and subjective evaluation in the radial club hand associated thumbs and for the functional score for the more severe Blauth group.

Conclusion

The general outcome for non radial club hand associated thumb reconstructions was satisfying. There was good correlation between the different scoring systems.

Keywords

thumb aplasia - congenital - pollicisation, reconstruction - pediatric

• References

• 1 Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicisation of the index finger by aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. Indications, methods, results. Handch 1971; 3: 45-59
• 2 Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicisation of the index finger. Method and results in aplasia and hypoplasia of the thumb. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1971; 53: 1605-1617
• 3 Foucher G, Medina J, Lorea P et al Pollicisation in congenital differences. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2004; 36: 146-151
• 4 Scheker L, Cendales L. Correcting congenital thumb anomalies in children: opponensplasty and pollicisation. In The growing hand. 2000. Gupta A, Kay S, Scheker L. (ed) London: Mosby; 171-182
• 5 Manske PR, McCaroll Jr HR. Index finger pollicisation for a congenitally absent or nonfunctioning thumb. J Hand Surg [Am] 1985; 10: 606-613
• 6 Buck-Gramcko D. Pollicisation. In Congenital malformations of the hand and forearm. 1998. Buck Gramcko D. (ed) 1998. London: Churchill Livingstone; 379-402
• 7 Percival NJ, Sykes PJ, Chandraprakasam T. A method of assessment of pollicisation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991; 16: 141-143
• 8 Goldfarb CA, Deardorff V, Chia B et al Objective features and aesthetic outcome of pollicised digits compared with normal thumbs. J Hand Surg [Am] 2007; 32: 1031-1036
• 9 Egloff D, Verdan C. Pollicisation of the index finger for reconstruction of the congenital hypoplastic or absent thumb. J Hand Surg 1983; 8: 839-848
• 10 Manske PR, Rotman MB, Dailey LA. Long-term functional results after pollicisation for the congenitally deficient thumb. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992; 17: 1064-1072
• 11 Roper BA, Tumbull TJ. Functional assessment after pollicisation. J Hand Surg [Br] 1986; 11: 399-403
• 12 Sykes PJ, Chandraprakasam T, Percival NJ. Pollicisation of the index finger in congenital anomalies. A retrospective analysis. J Hand Surg [Br] 1991; 16: 144-147
• 13 Kozin SH, Weiss AA, Webber JB et al Index finger pollicisation for congenital aplasia or hypoplasia of the thumb. J Hand Surg [Am] 1992; 17: 880-884
• 14 Knabl JS, Maitz PK, Deutinger M et al Analysis of hand function with the Millesi examination scale in patients with pollicisation after aplasia or hypoplasia of the thumb. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 1998; 30: 317-324
• 15 Staines KG, Majzoub R, Thornby J et al Functional outcome for children with thumb aplasia undergoing pollicisation. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 116: 1314-1323
• 16 Goldfarb CA, Gee AO, Heinze LK et al Normative values for thumb length, girth, and width in the pediatric population. J Hand Surg [Am] 2005; 30: 1004-1008
• 17 Decramer A, De Smut L. Clinical measurement of normal thumb length in children. J Pediatr Orthop B 2007; 16: 66-69