PDF herunterladen
J Hand Microsurg 2012; 04(01): 1-6
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-011-0051-x
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Recurrent Carpal Tunnel Syndrome—Analysis of the Impact of Patient Personality in Altering Functional Outcome Following a Vascularised Hypothenar Fat Pad Flap Surgery

K. Karthik
1   Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Woolwich, London, SE184QH, UK   eMail: karthi97@gmail.com
,
Rajesh Nanda
2   North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Trust, University Hospital of North Tees, Hardwick Rd., Stockton on Tees, TS19 8PE, UK
,
John Stothard
3   James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough, TS43BW, UK
› Institutsangaben
Verantwortlicher Herausgeber dieser Rubrik:
Weitere Informationen

Publikationsverlauf

12. Juni 2011

03. August 2011

Publikationsdatum:
05. September 2016 (online)

  als PDF herunterladen  Lizenzen und Reprints

Abstract

We retrospectively analysed 25 patients (27 hands) who had both clinical and electrophysiological confirmation of true recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome from January 2004 to December 2009. In all the patients, after releasing the nerve a vascularised fat pad flap was mobilised from the hypothenar region and sutured to the lateral cut end of flexor retinaculum. The patient characteristics, co-morbidities, duration of symptom, interval between first release and revision surgery and intra-operative findings were assessed against post-operative relief of pain, recovery of sensory and motor dysfunction. The average age of the patients was 58 years (43–81) and the dominant hand was involved in 22 patients. Intra-operatively the nerve was compressed by scar tissue connecting the previously divided ends of the retinaculum in 18 and nine had scar tissue and fibrosis around the nerve. Following surgery 16 patients had complete recovery (asymptomatic at the first follow-up), eight had delayed recovery (partial recovery of symptoms at final follow-up) and three had a poorer outcome (persistence of preoperative symptoms at the final follow-up). The patients with delayed recovery/poorer outcome had a) Early recurrence; b) Diabetes mellitus; c) Obesity; d) Cervical spine problems; e) Involvement of non-dominant hand; and f) Intraoperative scar tissue and fibrosis. The hypothenar fat pad transposition flap provides a reliable source of vascularised local tissue that can be used in patients with recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. The factors that were associated with poorer/delayed recovery were involvement of non-dominant hand, recurrence within a year from the previous surgery, intra-operatively scar tissue in the carpal tunnel and associated co-morbidities, like obesity diabetes mellitus and cervical spine problems.

Keywords

Hypothenar fat pad flap - Patient factors - Prediction of outcome - Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome
 

  • References

  • 1 Botte MJ, von Schroeder HP, Abrams RA, Gellman H. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1996; 12: 731-743
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Fusetti C, Garavaglia G, Mathoulin C, Petri JG, Lucchina S. A reliable and simple solution for recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome: the hypothenar fat pad flap. Am J Orthop 2009; 38: 181-186
    Google Scholar
  • 3 Kulick MI, Gordillo G, Javidi T, Kilgore Jr ES, Newmeyer III WL. Long-term analysis of patients having surgical treatment for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 1986; 11: 59-66
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Langloh ND, Linscheid RL. Recurrent and unrelieved carpaltunnel syndrome. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1972; 83: 41-47
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Luchetti R, Amadio P. Carpal tunnel syndrome. 2007. 1st edn Springer;
    CrossrefGoogle Scholar
  • 6 MacDonald RI, Lichtman DM, Hanlon JJ, Wilson JN. Complications of surgical release for carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 1978; 3: 70-76
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Strasberg SR, Novak CB, Mackinnon SE, Murray JF. Subjective and employment outcome following secondary carpal tunnel surgery. Ann Plast Surg 1994; 32: 485-489
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Raimbeau G. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Chir Main 2008; 27: 134-145
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Chrysopoulo MT, Greenberg JA, Kleinman WB. The hypothenar fat pad transposition flap: a modified surgical technique. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2006; 10: 150-156
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Craft RO, Duncan SFM, Smith AA. Management of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome with microneurolysis and the hypothenar. Fat Pad Flap Hand 2007; 2: 85-89
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Mathoulin C, Bahm J, Roukoz S. Pedicled hypothenar fat flap for median nerve coverage in recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Surg 2000; 5: 33-40
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Strickland JW, Idler RS, Lourie GM, Plancher KD. The hypothenar fat pad flap for management of recalcitrant carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21: 840-848
    Google Scholar
  • 13 Tollestrup T, Berg C, Netscher D. Management of distal traumatic median nerve painful neuromas and of recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome: hypothenar fat pad flap. J Hand Surg Am 2010; 35: 1010-1014
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Crammer LM. Local fat coverage for the median nerve. 1985. In: Lankford LL. (ed): correspondence newsletter for Hand surgery; 35.
    Google Scholar
  • 15 Pfeffer GB, Gelberman RH, Boyes JH, Rydevik B. The history of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Br 1988; 13: 28-34
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Ashworth NL. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Evid (Online) 2007; 1114
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosen I. Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA 1999; 282: 153-158
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Stütz N, Gohritz A, van Schoonhoven J, Lanz U. Revision surgery after carpal tunnel release-analysis of the pathology in 200 cases during a 2 year period. J Hand Surg Br 2006; 31: 68-71
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Bagatur AE. Analysis of the causes of failure in carpal tunnel syndrome surgery and the results of reoperation. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc 2002; 36: 346-353
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Dahlin LB, Salö M, Thomsen N, Stütz N. Carpal tunnel syndrome and treatment of recurrent symptoms. Scand J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2010; 44: 4-11
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 De Smet L. Recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical testing indicating incomplete section of the flexor retinaculum. J Hand Surg (Br) 1993; 18: 189
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Dellon AL, Mackinnon SE. The pronator quadratus muscle flap. J Hand Surg Am 1984; 9: 423-427
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Goitz RJ, Steichen JB. Microvascular omental transfer for the treatment of severe recurrent median neuritis of the wrist: a long- term follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005; 115: 163-171
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Reisman NR, Dellon AL. The abductor digiti minimi muscle flap: a salvage technique for palmar wrist pain. Plast Reconstr Surg 1983; 72: 859-865
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rose EH. The use of the palmaris brevis flap in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. Hand Clin 1996; 12: 389-395
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tham SK, Ireland DC, Riccio M, Morrison WA. Reverse radial artery fascial flap: a treatment for the chronically scarred median nerve in recurrent carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg (Am) 1996; 21: 849-854
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Varitimidis SE, Riano F, Vardakas DG, Sotereanos DG. Recurrent compressive neuropathy of the median nerve at the wrist: treatment with autogenous saphenous vein wrapping. J Hand Surg Br 2000; 25: 271-275
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Vögelin E, Bignion D, Constantinescu M, Büchler U. Revision surgery after carpal tunnel release using a posterior interosseous artery island flap. Handchir Mikrochir Plast Chir 2008; 40: 122-127
    Google Scholar
  • 29 Jones SM, Stuart PR, Stothard J. Open carpal tunnel release. Does a vascularized hypothenar fat pad reduce wound tenderness?. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22: 758-760
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Rhoades CE, Mowery CA, Gelberman RH. Results of internal neurolysis of the median nerve for severe carpal-tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1985; 67: 253-256
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Lowry Jr WE, Follender AB. Interfascicular neurolysis in the severe carpal tunnel syndrome. A prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1988; 227: 251-254
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 O'Malley MJ, Evanoff M, Terrono AL, Millender LH. Factors that determine reexploration treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17: 638-641
    Google Scholar
  • 33 Upton AR, McComas AJ. The double crush in nerve entrapment syndromes. Lancet 1973; 18: 359-362
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Hurst LC, Weissberg D, Carroll RE. The relationship of the double crush to carpal tunnel syndrome (an analysis of 1,000 cases of carpal tunnel syndrome). J Hand Surg Br 1985; 10: 202-204
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Niels OB, Thomsen MD, Cederlund R, Björk J, Dahlin LB. Clinical outcomes of surgical release among diabetic patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: prospective follow-up with matched controls. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 1177-1187
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Al-Quattan MM, Manktelow RT, Bowen CVA. Outcome of carpal tunnel release in diabetic patients. J Hand Surg (Br) 1994; 19: 626-629
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 De Krom MCTF, Kester A, Knipschild P, Spaans F. Risk factors for carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Epidemiol 1990; 132: 1102-1110
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Clarke AM, Stanley D. Prediction of the outcome 24 h after carpal tunnel decompression. J Hand Surg (Br) 1993; 18: 180-181
    PubMedGoogle Scholar