Tensile Strength of Flexor Tendon Repair Using Barbed Suture Material in a Dynamic Ex Vivo Model

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to compare two sutures; a knotted polydioxane with a knotless barbed in a 4-strand Kirchmayr-Kessler suture technique. Human flexor digitorum tendons were separated into four groups. Group 1 – polydioxane; Group 2 - barbed suture; Group 3 and 4 – same as group 1 and 2 with an additional peripheral running suture. In each group the repaired tendons were subjected to linear and cyclical loads. No difference in maximum tensile strength after linear and cyclical force could be detected between the knotted polydioxane suture and the knotless barbed suture. On linear force tests an additional circumferential repair increased the maximum tensile strength of both sutures. Cyclical force loading did not lead to a reduction of maximum strength. Following linear and cyclical loading the 4-strand barbed suture achieved maximum tensile strengths comparable to the 4-strand repair using the polydioxane suture. Barbed suture repair may offer the advantage of knotless suture techniques.

Keywords

Barbed suture - Load to failure - Tenorrhaphy - Dynamic testing - Tensile strength - Ex vivo

Presented at the

- 41^st Annual Meeting of the German College of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, in Dresden, Germany, September 15 through 18, 2010

- 51^st Annual Meeting of the German College of Hand Surgery, Nürnberg, Germany, October 7 through 10, 2010

- 16^th Congress of the International Confederation for Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery (IPRAS), Vancouver, Canada, May 22 through 27, 2011

• References

• 1 Bainbridge LC, Robertson C, Gillies D et al A comparison of post-operative mobilization of flexor tendon repairs with "passive flexion-active extension" and "controlled active motion" techniques. J Hand Surg Br 1994; 19: 517-521
• 2 Wada A, Kubota H, Miyanishi K et al Comparison of postoperative early active mobilization and immobilization in vivo utilising a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br 2001; 26: 301-306
• 3 Schuind F, Garcia-Elias M, Cooney 3rd WP et al Flexor tendon forces: in vivo measurements. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17: 291-298
• 4 Mishra V, Kuiper JH, Kelly CP. Influence of core suture material and peripheral repair technique on the strength of Kessler flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Br 2003; 28: 357-362
• 5 Shaieb MD, Singer DI. Tensile strengths of various suture techniques. J Hand Surg Br 1997; 22: 764-767
• 6 Lawrence TM, Davis TR. A biomechanical analysis of suture materials and their influence on a four-strand flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 836-841
• 7 Trail IA, Powell ES, Noble J. An evaluation of suture materials used in tendon surgery. J Hand Surg Br 1989; 14: 422-427
• 8 Barrie KA, Tomak SL, Cholewicki J et al The role of multiple strands and locking sutures on gap formation of flexor tendon repairs during cyclical loading. J Hand Surg Am 2000; 25: 714-720
• 9 Dovan TT, Ditsios KT, Boyer MI. Eight-strand core suture technique for repair of intrasynovial flexor tendon lacerations. Tech Hand Up Extrem Surg 2003; 7: 70-74
• 10 Kubota H, Aoki M, Pruitt DL et al Mechanical properties of various circumferential tendon suture techniques. J Hand Surg Br 1996; 21: 474-480
• 11 Osada D, Fujita S, Tamai K et al Flexor tendon repair in zone II with 6-strand techniques and early active mobilization. J Hand Surg Am 2006; 31: 987-992
• 12 Tran HN, Cannon DL, Lieber RL et al In vitro cyclic tensile testing of combined peripheral and core flexor tenorrhaphy suture techniques. J Hand Surg Am 2002; 27: 518-524
• 13 Xie RG, Tang JB. Investigation of locking configurations for tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 461-465
• 14 Xie RG, Xue HG, Gu JH et al Effects of locking area on strength of 2- and 4-strand locking tendon repairs. J Hand Surg Am 2005; 30: 455-460
• 15 Aoki M, Pruitt DL, Kubota H et al Effect of suture knots on tensile strength of repaired canine flexor tendons. J Hand Surg Br 1995; 20: 72-75
• 16 Rees L, Matthews A, Masouros SD et al Comparison of 1-and 2-knot, 4-strand, double-modified kessler tendon repairs in a porcine model. J Hand Surg Am 2009; 34: 705-709
• 17 Bunnell S. Gig pull-out suture for tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1954; 36: 850-851
• 18 McKenzie AR. An experimental multiple barbed suture for the long flexor tendons of the palm and fingers. Preliminary report. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1967; 49: 440-447
• 19 Parikh PM, Davison SP, Higgins JP. Barbed suture tenorrhaphy: an ex vivo biomechanical analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2009; 124: 1551-1558
• 20 Trocchia AM, Aho HN, Sobol G. A re-exploration of the use of barbed sutures in flexor tendon repairs. Orthopedics 2009; 32
• 21 Mason ML, Allen HS. The rate of healing tendons: an experimental study of tensile strength. Ann Surg 1941; 113: 424-459
• 22 Strickland JW. Flexor tendon injuries: I. Foundations of treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 1995; 3: 44-54
• 23 Aoki M, Kubota H, Pruitt DL et al Biomechanical and histologic characteristics of canine flexor tendon repair using early postoperative mobilization. J Hand Surg Am 1997; 22: 107-114
• 24 Hitchcock TF, Light TR, Bunch WH et al The effect of immediate constrained digital motion on the strength of flexor tendon repairs in chickens. J Hand Surg Am 1987; 12: 590-595
• 25 Elliot D, Moiemen NS, Flemming AF et al The rupture rate of acute flexor tendon repairs mobilized by the controlled active motion regimen. J Hand Surg Br 1994; 19: 607-612
• 26 Lister GD, Kleinert HE, Kutz JE et al Primary flexor tendon repair followed by immediate controlled mobilization. J Hand Surg Am 1977; 2: 441-451
• 27 Zeplin PH, Zahn RK, Meffert RH et al Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: a comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36 ((3)) 446-449
• 28 McClellan WT, Schessler MJ, Ruch DS et al A knotless flexor tendon repair technique using a bidirectional barbed suture: an ex vivo comparison of three methods. Plast Reconstr Surg 2011; 128 ((4)) 322e-327e
• 29 Pruitt DL, Manske PR, Fink B. Cyclic stress analysis of flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 1991; 16: 701-707
• 30 Pruitt DL, Tanaka H, Aoki M et al Cyclic stress testing after in vivo healing of canine flexor tendon lacerations. J Hand Surg Am 1996; 21: 974-977
• 31 Gelberman RH, Boyer MI, Brodt MD et al The effect of gap formation at the repair site on the strength and excursion of intrasynovial flexor tendons. An experimental study on the early stages of tendon-healing in dogs. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1999; 81: 975-982
• 32 Seradge H. Elongation of the repair configuration following flexor tendon repair. J Hand Surg Am 1983; 8: 182-185
• 33 Silfverskiöld KL, May EJ, Törnvall AH. Gap formation during controlled motion after flexor tendon repair in zone II: a prospective clinical study. J Hand Surg Am 1992; 17: 539-546
• 34 Haddad R, Peltz TS, Walsh WR. Biomechanical evaluation of flexor tendon repair using barbed suture material: A comparative ex vivo study. J Hand Surg Am 2011; 36(A): 1565-1566