J Hand Microsurg 2015; 07(01): 42-48
DOI: 10.1007/s12593-014-0164-0
Original Article
Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Private Ltd.

Radiographs Versus Radiographic Measurements in Distal Radius Fractures

Valentin Neuhaus
1   Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA   Email: dring@partners.org
2   Division of Trauma Surgery, UniversityHospital Zurich, Zurich, CH-8091, Switzerland
,
Arjan G. Bot
1   Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA   Email: dring@partners.org
,
Thierry G. Guitton
1   Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA   Email: dring@partners.org
,
David C. Ring
1   Orthopaedic Hand Service, Yawkey Center, Suite 2100, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA   Email: dring@partners.org
› Author Affiliations

Subject Editor:
Further Information

Publication History

02 July 2014

13 October 2014

Publication Date:
13 September 2016 (online)

Preview

Abstract

Surgeons use radiographic measures of deformity to help make treatment decisions in distal radius fractures. Precise threshold values are sometimes offered as a guide to treatment. The purpose was to evaluate if agreement on treatment recommendations would improve if surgeons were provided with radiographs rather than precise numeric radiographic measurements. We randomized 259 surgeons to review the scenarios of 30 consecutive adult patients with a distal radius fracture treated at our emergency department either with radiographs (135 surgeons) or with radiographic measurements (124 surgeons). Interrater reliability was measured with the Fleiss’ generalized Kappa. Factors associated with a recommendation for operative treatment were sought in bivariate and multivariable analyses. Surgeons that received measurements only recommended operative treatment significantly more often, but were less likely to agree than surgeons evaluating actual radiographs. Patient factors - radiographic factors in particular - had a greater influence on treatment recommendation than surgeon factors. Agreement on treatment recommendations improved if surgeons were provided with radiographs instead of just measurements. There may be radiographic factors other than measures of deformity that some surgeons use to determine recommendations for surgery.