Endoscopy 2020; 52(12): v50
DOI: 10.1055/a-1199-8443
Author commentary

Author commentary on Andrada Seicean et al.

› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Andrada Seicean et al. Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trial

In 148 patients randomized to endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) vs. contrast-enhanced harmonic EUS (CH-EUS)-guided FNA for solid pancreatic lesions, diagnostic rates were similar, and no improvement was seen when guiding FNA by CH-EUS.

Quality:


Publication History

Article published online:
25 November 2020

© 2020. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

Refers to:

Contrast-enhanced harmonic versus standard endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration in solid pancreatic lesions: a single-center prospective randomized trialEndoscopy 2020; 52(12): 1084-1090
DOI: 10.1055/a-1193-4954