Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2023; 240(11): 1246-1254
DOI: 10.1055/a-1830-0505
Klinische Studie

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Quality of Care of Treatment-Naïve Patients with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Receiving Intravitreal Aflibercept

Article in several languages: deutsch | English
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
2   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Ganserndorf, Mistelbach, Österreich
,
Alexander Franchi
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Katharina Frede
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Julia Rettenwander
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Tanja Rettenwander
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Julia Neyer
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Martin Stattin
3   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Wiener Gesundheitsverbund Klinik Landstraße, Wien, Österreich
,
Martina Kralinger
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
,
Claus Zehetner
1   Augenheilkunde und Optometrie, Medizinische Universität Innsbruck, Österreich
› Author Affiliations

Abstract

Objective The aim of this study was to compare the quality of care received by treatment-naïve patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) who received intravitreal aflibercept therapy before the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with patients who received the same therapy during the pandemic.

Methods Data, including best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) and anatomical outcomes at diagnosis and at each follow-up, was collected on 297 treatment-naïve patients who received intravitreal aflibercept. Therapy-naïve patients who started therapy at least 24 months prior to the first pandemic-related lockdown and were thus treated exclusively prior to the pandemic (n = 123) were compared with patients who started therapy within 12 months prior to the first lockdown and were thus treated during the pandemic (n = 174). Both groups were followed over a two-year period.

Results In patients treated before the COVID-19 pandemic, VA remained stable (0.58 ± 0.41 logMAR) compared to baseline (0.54 ± 0.34 logMAR; p = 0.228) until the end of the observation period. In patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic, BCVA dropped below the baseline (0.56 ± 0.35 logMAR) within 24-month of follow-up (0.79 ± 0.43 logMAR; p = 0.010). Compared to the patients treated prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, the latter group showed a significantly worse VA at the 6-month (p = 0.041), 12-month (p = 0.040), 18-month (p = 0.024), 21-month (p = 0.035), and 24-month (p = 0.004) follow-up. Additionally, the group treated during the COVID-19 pandemic received significantly fewer aflibercept injections (3,94 ± 1,9 vs. 3,30 ± 1,6; p = 0,007) and fewer follow-up examinations (2,71 ± 1,2 vs. 2,16 ± 0,9; p < 0,001) in the second year compared to the group that was treated before the COVID-19 pandemic.

Conclusion We confirmed significantly worse VA outcomes in the group of nAMD patients treated during the COVID-19 pandemic. Impeded access to care could be attributed to the restrictions imposed owing to the COVID-19 pandemic.



Publication History

Received: 10 February 2022

Accepted: 12 April 2022

Accepted Manuscript online:
20 April 2022

Article published online:
04 August 2022

© 2022. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany