Download PDF
CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(04): C12
DOI: 10.1055/a-1834-5697
Correction

Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video)

Ariosto Hernandez
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Neil B. Marya
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Tarek Sawas
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Elizabeth Rajan
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Naomi M. Gades
3   Department of Comparative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
,
Louis M. Wong Kee Song
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Navtej Buttar
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Andrew C. Storm
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
› Author Affiliations
› Further Information
Also available at
   Permissions and Reprints

Corrected by:

Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video)Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(04): E572-E577
DOI: 10.1055/a-1370-9256

Correction

Ariosto Hernandez, Neil B. Marya, Tarek Sawas et al. Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video) Endoscopy International Open 2021; 4: E572–E577. DOI: 10.1055/a-1370-9256
In the above-mentioned article [Table 1] was corrected as follows.

This was corrected in the online version on 04.05.2022.

Table 1

Comparison of X-Tack vs through-the-scope clip performance.

Variable

X-Tack (n = 24)

Mean ± SD/%

Clips (n = 16)

Mean ± SD/%

P value

Anatomic site

0.29

  • Stomach

66.7 % (n = 16)

50 % (n = 8)

  • Colon

33.3 % (n = 8)

50 % (n = 8)

Successful closure

100 % (24/24)

81.3 % (13)

0.13

Closure time (min)

7.7 ± 3.31

3.9 ± 3.3

0.001

Induced lesion diameter (mm)

32.1 ± 5.8

28.3 ± 5.2

0.04

Follow-up final diameter (mm)

0.3 ± 1.2

0.4 ± 1.0

0.74

Number of devices deployed during initial closure

1.0 ± 0.2

4.3 ± 1.4

0.000

Residual devices at necropsy

0.8 ± 0.4

0.3 ± 0.9

0.043


Publication History

Article published online:
04 May 2022

© 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany