CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 · Endosc Int Open 2021; 09(04): C12
DOI: 10.1055/a-1834-5697
Correction

Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video)

Ariosto Hernandez
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Neil B. Marya
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Tarek Sawas
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Elizabeth Rajan
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Naomi M. Gades
3   Department of Comparative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
,
Louis M. Wong Kee Song
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Barham K. Abu Dayyeh
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Navtej Buttar
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
,
Andrew C. Storm
1   Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
2   Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
› Author Affiliations
 
    Correction

    Ariosto Hernandez, Neil B. Marya, Tarek Sawas et al. Gastrointestinal defect closure using a novel through-the-scope helix tack and suture device compared to endoscopic clips in a survival porcine model (with video) Endoscopy International Open 2021; 4: E572–E577. DOI: 10.1055/a-1370-9256
    In the above-mentioned article [Table 1] was corrected as follows.

    This was corrected in the online version on 04.05.2022.

    Table 1

    Comparison of X-Tack vs through-the-scope clip performance.

    Variable

    X-Tack (n = 24)

    Mean ± SD/%

    Clips (n = 16)

    Mean ± SD/%

    P value

    Anatomic site

    0.29

    • Stomach

    66.7 % (n = 16)

    50 % (n = 8)

    • Colon

    33.3 % (n = 8)

    50 % (n = 8)

    Successful closure

    100 % (24/24)

    81.3 % (13)

    0.13

    Closure time (min)

    7.7 ± 3.31

    3.9 ± 3.3

    0.001

    Induced lesion diameter (mm)

    32.1 ± 5.8

    28.3 ± 5.2

    0.04

    Follow-up final diameter (mm)

    0.3 ± 1.2

    0.4 ± 1.0

    0.74

    Number of devices deployed during initial closure

    1.0 ± 0.2

    4.3 ± 1.4

    0.000

    Residual devices at necropsy

    0.8 ± 0.4

    0.3 ± 0.9

    0.043


    #

    Competing interests

    This study was funded by a research grant from Apollo Endosurgery. Dr. Abu Dayyeh has received a research grant from Apollo Endosurgery. Dr. Storm has received a research grant and consulting fees from Apollo Endosurgery and consulting fees from ERBE.

    Corresponding author

    Andrew C. Storm, MD
    Mayo Clinic Developmental Endoscopy Unit
    200 First St SW
    Rochester, MN 55905
    United States   
    Fax: +1-507-255-7612   

    Publication History

    Article published online:
    04 May 2022

    © 2021. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)

    Georg Thieme Verlag KG
    Rüdigerstraße 14, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany