The Influence of the Partner's Involvement in Antenatal Genetic Group Counseling on Pregnant individuals' Scores on Tests of Vital Knowledge Relating to Pregnancy

Abstract

Objective Physicians and other medical providers counsel patients to provide them with most important information and available medical service options. How to provide the most effective antenatal counseling is an important focus among experts. Our study focuses on the influence of the partner's involvement during antenatal genetic group counseling (AGGC). This study aimed to compare the ratio of pregnant individuals who have knowledge score improvement after AGGC, with a focus on pregnant individuals who attend counseling with/without their partner and to identify other possible factors that could influence the knowledge improvement.

Study Design A prospective cohort study was conducted. Pregnant individuals were assessed for their knowledge by using a self-questionnaire prior to and immediately after AGGC.

Results A total of 553 pregnant women were enrolled; 310 and 243 participants attended the AGGC without and with their partner, respectively. The ratio of the participants who increased their overall knowledge score was significantly higher after the AGGC for those who were with partner compared with those without. The medians (Q1–Q3) of the overall knowledge scores before and after the AGGC were 32 (29–36) and 36 (31–39) in the AGGC with their partner, respectively, and 33 (30–36) and 35 (32–39) in the AGGC without their partner, respectively. Knowledge of trisomy-21 screening of all participants got the lowest score and less improvement when compared with other topics.

Conclusion Partner's involvement in the AGGC was associated with a higher ratio of the participants who increased their overall knowledge score when comparing the scores prior to and immediately after the AGGC.

Keywords

counseling - knowledge - partner

• References

• 1 Stembalska A, Slezak R, Pesz K, Gil J, Sasiadek M. Prenatal diagnosis–principles of diagnostic procedures and genetic counseling. Folia Histochem Cytobiol 2007; 45 (Suppl. 01) S11-S16
• 2 Hanprasertpong T, Rattanaprueksachart R, Janwadee S. et al. Comparison of the effectiveness of different counseling methods before second trimester genetic amniocentesis in Thailand. Prenat Diagn 2013; 33 (12) 1189-1193
• 3 Wai KM, Shibanuma A, Oo NN, Fillman TJ, Saw YM, Jimba M. Are husbands involving in their spouses' utilization of maternal care services? A cross-sectional study in Yangon, Myanmar. PLoS One 2015; 10 (12) e0144135
• 4 Jennings L, Yebadokpo AS, Affo J, Agbogbe M. Antenatal counseling in maternal and newborn care: use of job aids to improve health worker performance and maternal understanding in Benin. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2010; 10: 75
• 5 Semrau K, Kuhn L, Vwalika C. et al. Women in couples antenatal HIV counseling and testing are not more likely to report adverse social events. AIDS 2005; 19 (06) 603-609
• 6 Mohammadpour M, Mohammad-Alizadeh Charandabi S, Malakouti J, Mohammadi MN, Mirghafourvand M. The effect of counseling on fathers' stress and anxiety during pregnancy: a randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Psychiatry 2021; 21 (01) 208
• 7 August F, Pembe AB, Mpembeni R, Axemo P, Darj E. Men's knowledge of obstetric danger signs, birth preparedness and complication readiness in rural Tanzania. PLoS One 2015; 10 (05) e0125978
• 8 Pruksanusak N, Suwanrath C, Kor-Anantakul O. et al. A survey of the knowledge and attitudes of pregnant Thai women towards Down syndrome screening. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2009; 35 (05) 876-881
• 9 de Leeuw RA, van der Horst SFB, de Soet AM. et al. Digital vs face-to-face information provision in patient counselling for prenatal screening: a noninferiority randomized controlled trial. Prenat Diagn 2019; 39 (06) 456-463