Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2023; 40(16): 1725-1731
DOI: 10.1055/a-2099-4395
SMFM Fellowship Series Article

Predicting Spontaneous Labor beyond 39 Weeks among Low-Risk Expectantly Managed Pregnant Patients

Ayodeji Sanusi 
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Yuanfan Ye
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
3   Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Ashley N. Battarbee 
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Rachel Sinkey
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Rebecca Pearlman
4   School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Danyon Beitel
4   School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Jeff M. Szychowski
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
3   Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Alan T. N. Tita
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
,
Akila Subramaniam
1   Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
2   Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
› Author Affiliations Funding A.N.B. was supported by K23HD103875 from the NICHD during the study. The other authors report no financial support.
› Further Information
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics associated with spontaneous labor onset in pregnant patients undergoing expectant management at greater than 39 weeks' gestation and delineate perinatal outcomes associated with spontaneous labor compared with labor induction.

Study Design This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies at ≥390/7 weeks' gestation delivered at a single center in 2013. The exclusion criteria were elective induction, cesarean delivery or presence of a medical indication for delivery at 39 weeks, more than one prior cesarean delivery, and fetal anomaly or demise. We evaluated prenatally available maternal characteristics as potential predictors of the primary outcome-spontaneous labor onset. Multivariable logistic regression was used to generate two parsimonious models: one with and one without third trimester cervical dilation. We also performed sensitivity analysis by parity and timing of cervical examination, and compared the mode of delivery and other secondary outcomes between patients who went into spontaneous labor and those who did not.

Results Of 707 eligible patients, 536 (75.8%) attained spontaneous labor and 171 (24.2%) did not. In the first model, maternal body mass index (BMI), parity, and substance use were identified as the most predictive factors. Overall, the model did not predict spontaneous labor (area under the curve [AUC]: 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.61–0.70) with high accuracy. The addition of third trimester cervical dilation in the second model did not significantly improve labor prediction (AUC: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.61–0.70; p = 0.76). These results did not differ by timing of cervical examination or parity. Patients admitted in spontaneous labor had lower odds of cesarean delivery (odds ratio [OR]: 0.33; 95% CI: 0.21–0.53) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.15–0.94). Other perinatal outcomes were similar between the groups.

Conclusion Maternal characteristics did not predict spontaneous labor onset at ≥39 weeks' gestation with high accuracy. Patients should be counseled on the challenges of labor prediction regardless of parity and cervical examination, outcomes if spontaneous labor does not occur, and benefits of labor induction.

Key Points

  • Majority of patients will attain spontaneous labor at ≥39 weeks.

  • Maternal characteristics do not predict labor at ≥39 weeks.

  • Spontaneous labor has associated lower perinatal risks.

  • A shared decision model should be utilized in counseling patients who may choose expectant management.

Keywords

labor induction - labor prediction - spontaneous labor - expectant labor management

Note

Presented at the 41st Annual Pregnancy Meeting of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine, January 25–30, 2021 (abstract no.: 1,138).


Supplementary Material



Publication History

Received: 19 July 2022

Accepted: 22 May 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
24 May 2023

Article published online:
28 June 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Osterman MJK, Martin JA. Recent declines in induction of labor by gestational age. NCHS Data Brief 2014; (155) 1-8
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Hamilton BE, Martin JA, Osterman MJK, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep 2015; 64 (12) 1-64
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Late-preterm MI. ACOG Committee on Quality Improvement and Patient Safety. ACOG Committee Opinion #327: “do not use” abbreviations. Obstet Gynecol 2006; 107 (01) 213-214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Gilroy LC, Al-Kouatly HB, Minkoff HL, McLaren Jr RAJ. Changes in obstetrical practices and pregnancy outcomes following the ARRIVE trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226 (05) 716.e1-716.e12
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Grobman WA, Rice MM, Reddy UM. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal–Fetal Medicine Units Network. Labor Induction versus expectant management in low-risk nulliparous women. N Engl J Med 2018; 379 (06) 513-523
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Einerson BD, Grobman WA. Elective induction of labor: friend or foe?. Semin Perinatol 2020; 44 (02) 151214
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Sinkey RG, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM. et al. Elective induction of labor in the 39th week of gestation compared with expectant management of low-risk multiparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 134 (02) 282-287
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Grobman WA, Caughey AB. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks compared with expectant management: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 221 (04) 304-310
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Sotiriadis A, Petousis S, Thilaganathan B. et al. Maternal and perinatal outcomes after elective induction of labor at 39 weeks in uncomplicated singleton pregnancy: a meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2019; 53 (01) 26-35
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Gibbs Pickens CM, Kramer MR, Howards PP, Badell ML, Caughey AB, Hogue CJ. Term elective induction of labor and pregnancy outcomes among obese women and their offspring. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 131 (01) 12-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Palatnik A, Kominiarek MA. Outcomes of elective induction of labor versus expectant management among obese women at ≥39 weeks. Am J Perinatol 2020; 37 (07) 695-707
    Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Sinkey RG, Lacevic J, Reljic T. et al. Elective induction of labor at 39 weeks among nulliparous women: the impact on maternal and neonatal risk. PLoS One 2018; 13 (04) e0193169
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Osmundson S, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with an unfavorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2011; 117 (03) 583-587
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Osmundson SS, Ou-Yang RJ, Grobman WA. Elective induction compared with expectant management in nulliparous women with a favorable cervix. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 116 (03) 601-605
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Grobman WA. Predictors of induction success. Semin Perinatol 2012; 36 (05) 344-347
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 Michelson KA, Carr DB, Easterling TR. The impact of duration of labor induction on cesarean rate. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199 (03) 299.e1-299.e4
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Vrouenraets FPJM, Roumen FJME, Dehing CJG, van den Akker ESA, Aarts MJB, Scheve EJT. Bishop score and risk of cesarean delivery after induction of labor in nulliparous women. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 105 (04) 690-697
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 18 Roos N, Sahlin L, Ekman-Ordeberg G, Kieler H, Stephansson O. Maternal risk factors for postterm pregnancy and cesarean delivery following labor induction. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89 (08) 1003-1010
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 Sciscione A, Hoffman MK, DeLuca S. et al. Fetal fibronectin as a predictor of vaginal birth in nulliparas undergoing preinduction cervical ripening. Obstet Gynecol 2005; 106 (5, Pt 1): 980-985
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Ferrazzi E, Brembilla G, Cipriani S, Livio S, Paganelli A, Parazzini F. Maternal age and body mass index at term: Risk factors for requiring an induced labour for a late-term pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2019; 233: 151-157
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Denison FC, Price J, Graham C, Wild S, Liston WA. Maternal obesity, length of gestation, risk of postdates pregnancy and spontaneous onset of labour at term. BJOG 2008; 115 (06) 720-725
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Akgol S, Rapisarda AMC, Budak MS. et al. The effect of obesity on the onset of spontaneous labor and scheduled delivery rates in term pregnancies. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2020; 59 (01) 34-38
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 Rao A, Celik E, Poggi S, Poon L, Nicolaides KH. Fetal Medicine Foundation Prolonged Pregnancy Group. Cervical length and maternal factors in expectantly managed prolonged pregnancy: prediction of onset of labor and mode of delivery. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2008; 32 (05) 646-651
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Subramaniam A, Lees BF, Becker DA, Tang Y, Khan MJ, Edwards RK. Evaluation of human papillomavirus as a risk factor for preterm birth or pregnancy-related hypertension. Obstet Gynecol 2016; 127 (02) 233-240
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Saccone G, Simonetti B, Berghella V. Transvaginal ultrasound cervical length for prediction of spontaneous labour at term: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2016; 123 (01) 16-22
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Tita ATN, Doherty L, Grobman WA. et al; Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units (MFMU) Network. Maternal and perinatal outcomes of expectant management of full-term, low-risk, nulliparous patients. Obstet Gynecol 2021; 137 (02) 250-257
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Fruscalzo A, Mazza E, Feltovich H, Schmitz R. Cervical elastography during pregnancy: a critical review of current approaches with a focus on controversies and limitations. J Med Ultrason 2016; 43 (04) 493-504
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Feltovich H. Cervical evaluation: from ancient medicine to precision medicine. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (01) 51-63
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Yo Y, Kotani Y, Shiro R. et al. Relationship between cervical elastography and spontaneous onset of labor. Sci Rep 2020; 10 (01) 19685
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Phillippe M. Cell-free fetal DNA: a trigger for parturition. N Engl J Med 2014; 370 (26) 2534-2536
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar