Download PDF
Am J Perinatol 2024; 41(S 01): e3035-e3044
DOI: 10.1055/a-2185-3931
Original Article

Characteristics and Outcomes of Obstetric Sepsis by Three Sets of Clinical Diagnostic Criteria: A Retrospective Study

Nicole Pohl
1   Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Melissa Bauer
2   Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina
,
Carlo Pancaro
1   Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Ruth Cassidy
1   Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
,
Milo Engoren
1   Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
› Author Affiliations Funding This study was supported solely by departmental and institutional resources.
› Further Information
Also available at
    Permissions and Reprints

Abstract

Objective Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States is the highest of all developed nations with a reported rate of 17 deaths per 100,000 live births in 2014 to 2017. Sepsis-related mortality is a major component of pregnancy-related mortality. Similar to nonpregnancy-related sepsis, the criteria for pregnancy-related sepsis are evolving. The purposes of this study were to compare three criteria for sepsis (Sepsis-2, Sepsis-3, California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative [CMQCC]) with one another and to determine patient outcomes using those three sets of criteria.

Study Design Using the electronic medical record, we obtained granular data on all patients at University of Michigan Medical Center from July 10, 2009 to September 4, 2019 with suspected sepsis (blood cultures and administration of antibiotics) during pregnancy until the 42nd postpartum day. Agreement between the three criteria were assessed with kappa and shown by a Venn diagram. Groups were compared using standardized differences and chi square, rank sum, or independent t-tests.

Results Of the 228 patients having sepsis by any criteria, 191 (83%) patients met the criteria for Sepsis-2, 131 (57%) for Sepsis-3, and 62 (27%) met criteria according to CMQCC. Agreement between the three criteria ranged from kappa = 0.13 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.09, 0.18) to kappa = 0.31 (95% CI: 0.23, 0.39). Patients who met CMQCC criteria tended to have more comorbidities and higher APACHE II (Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation) scores. Mortality (by 90 days) among the groups was low with 10 (4%) patients dying. Patients meeting criteria for CMQCC sepsis had higher mortality than the non-CMQCC patients with sepsis (10 vs. 2%, standardized difference = 0.31, p = 0.027).

Conclusion The agreement among Sepsis-2, Sepsis-3, and CMQCC diagnostic criteria is weak. CMQCC criteria identifies patients with sepsis at higher risk of death.

Key Points

  • Agreements (kappa) between the three criteria are poor.

  • CMQCC sepsis patients have more comorbidities.

  • Endometritis was the most common cause of sepsis.

  • CMQCC mortality was 10%; non-CMQCC mortality was 2%.

Keywords

obstetric sepsis - mortality - pregnancy


Publication History

Received: 26 December 2022

Accepted: 26 September 2023

Accepted Manuscript online:
04 October 2023

Article published online:
07 November 2023

© 2023. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 

  • References

  • 1 Creanga AA, Syverson C, Seed K, Callaghan WM. Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (02) 366-373
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 2 Gunja MZ, Seervai S, Zephyrin L, Williams II RD. Health and health care for women of reproductive age: how the United States compares with other high-income countries (Commonwealth Fund, April 2022). Accessed October 18, 2023 at: https://doi.org/10.26099/4pph-j894
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 3 Oud L, Watkins P. Evolving trends in the epidemiology, resource utilization, and outcomes of pregnancy-associated severe sepsis: a population-based cohort study. J Clin Med Res 2015; 7 (06) 400-416
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 4 Al-Ostad G, Kezouh A, Spence AR, Abenhaim HA. Incidence and risk factors of sepsis mortality in labor, delivery and after birth: population-based study in the USA. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2015; 41 (08) 1201-1206
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 5 Bauer ME, Bateman BT, Bauer ST, Shanks AM, Mhyre JM. Maternal sepsis mortality and morbidity during hospitalization for delivery: temporal trends and independent associations for severe sepsis. Anesth Analg 2013; 117 (04) 944-950
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 6 Kendle AM, Salemi JL, Tanner JP, Louis JM. Delivery-associated sepsis: trends in prevalence and mortality. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 220 (04) 391.e1-391.e16
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 7 Burlinson CEG, Sirounis D, Walley KR, Chau A. Sepsis in pregnancy and the puerperium. Int J Obstet Anesth 2018; 36: 96-107
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 8 Bonet M, Nogueira Pileggi V, Rijken MJ. et al. Towards a consensus definition of maternal sepsis: results of a systematic review and expert consultation. Reprod Health 2017; 14 (01) 67
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 9 Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW. et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA 2016; 315 (08) 801-810
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 10 Bone RC, Balk RA, Cerra FB. et al; The ACCP/SCCM Consensus Conference Committee. American College of Chest Physicians/Society of Critical Care Medicine. Definitions for sepsis and organ failure and guidelines for the use of innovative therapies in sepsis. Chest 1992; 101 (06) 1644-1655
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 11 Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W. et al. Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med 2017; 43 (03) 304-377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 12 Iwashyna TJ, Odden A, Rohde J. et al. Identifying patients with severe sepsis using administrative claims: patient-level validation of the angus implementation of the international consensus conference definition of severe sepsis. Med Care 2014; 52 (06) e39-e43
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 13 Feng C, Kethireddy S, Paul G, Mei Y. The age adjusted 12-year incidence and mortality rates of sepsis using the third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3) on MIMIC-III data. Chest 2017; 152: A402
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 14 Bauer ME, Housey M, Bauer ST. et al. Risk factors, etiologies, and screening tools for sepsis in pregnant women: a multicenter case-control study. Anesth Analg 2019; 129 (06) 1613-1620
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 15 Albright CM, Has P, Rouse DJ, Hughes BL. Internal validation of the sepsis in obstetrics score to identify risk of morbidity from sepsis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2017; 130 (04) 747-755
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 16 World Health Organization. Statement on maternal sepsis. Accessed January 14, 2022 at: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/254608/1/WHO-RHR-17.02-eng.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 17 Gibbs R, Bauer M, Olvera L, Sakowski C, Cape V, Main E. Improving diagnosis and treatment of maternal sepsis: a quality improvement toolkit. Stanford, CA: California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative Obstetrics and Gynecology;; 2020: 67
    Google Scholar
  • 18 Benchimol EI, Smeeth L, Guttmann A. et al; RECORD Working Committee. The REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely-collected health Data (RECORD) statement. PLoS Med 2015; 12 (10) e1001885
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 19 WHO. The Prevention and Management of Puerperal Infections. Report of a technical group. Geneva: 1992 . Accessed 31 May 2022 at: https://extranet.who.int/iris/restricted/bitstream/10665/59429/1/WHO_FHE_MSM_95.4.pdf
    PubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 20 Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13 (10) 818-829
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 21 Bateman BT, Mhyre JM, Hernandez-Diaz S. et al. Development of a comorbidity index for use in obstetric patients. Obstet Gynecol 2013; 122 (05) 957-965
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 22 Elixhauser A, Steiner C, Harris DR, Coffey RM. Comorbidity measures for use with administrative data. Med Care 1998; 36 (01) 8-27
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 23 McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb) 2012; 22 (03) 276-282
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 24 Engoren M, Seelhammer T, Freundlich RE, Maile MD, Sigakis MJG, Schwann TA. A comparison of Sepsis-2 (systemic inflammatory response syndrome based) to Sepsis-3 (sequential organ failure assessment based) definitions-a multicenter retrospective study. Crit Care Med 2020; 48 (09) 1258-1264
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 25 Rivers E, Nguyen B, Havstad S. et al; Early Goal-Directed Therapy Collaborative Group. Early goal-directed therapy in the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock. N Engl J Med 2001; 345 (19) 1368-1377
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 26 Kumar A, Roberts D, Wood KE. et al. Duration of hypotension before initiation of effective antimicrobial therapy is the critical determinant of survival in human septic shock. Crit Care Med 2006; 34 (06) 1589-1596
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 27 Ali A, Lamont RF. Recent advances in the diagnosis and management of sepsis in pregnancy. F1000 Res 2019; 8: 1546
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 28 Daniels R, Nutbeam T, McNamara G, Galvin C. The sepsis six and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle: a prospective observational cohort study. Emerg Med J 2011; 28 (06) 507-512
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 29 Lappen JR, Keene M, Lore M, Grobman WA, Gossett DR. Existing models fail to predict sepsis in an obstetric population with intrauterine infection. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2010; 203 (06) 573.e1-573.e5
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 30 Contou D, Roux D, Jochmans S. et al. Septic shock with no diagnosis at 24 hours: a pragmatic multicenter prospective cohort study. Crit Care 2016; 20 (01) 360
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 31 Brun-Buisson C, Doyon F, Carlet J. et al; French ICU Group for Severe Sepsis. Incidence, risk factors, and outcome of severe sepsis and septic shock in adults. A multicenter prospective study in intensive care units. JAMA 1995; 274 (12) 968-974
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 32 Acosta CD, Kurinczuk JJ, Lucas DN, Tuffnell DJ, Sellers S, Knight M. United Kingdom Obstetric Surveillance System. Severe maternal sepsis in the UK, 2011-2012: a national case-control study. PLoS Med 2014; 11 (07) e1001672
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 33 Acosta CD, Harrison DA, Rowan K, Lucas DN, Kurinczuk JJ, Knight M. Maternal morbidity and mortality from severe sepsis: a national cohort study. BMJ Open 2016; 6 (08) e012323
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 34 Acosta CD, Knight M, Lee HC, Kurinczuk JJ, Gould JB, Lyndon A. The continuum of maternal sepsis severity: incidence and risk factors in a population-based cohort study. PLoS One 2013; 8 (07) e67175
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 35 Abir G, Akdagli S, Butwick A, Carvalho B. Clinical and microbiological features of maternal sepsis: a retrospective study. Int J Obstet Anesth 2017; 29: 26-33
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 36 Rhee C, Dantes R, Epstein L. et al; CDC Prevention Epicenter Program. Incidence and trends of sepsis in us hospitals using clinical vs claims data, 2009–2014. JAMA 2017; 318 (13) 1241-1249
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 37 Jolley RJ, Quan H, Jetté N. et al. Validation and optimisation of an ICD-10-coded case definition for sepsis using administrative health data. BMJ Open 2015; 5 (12) e009487
    CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  • 38 Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Specifications Manual for National. Hospital Inpatient Quality Measures. Accessed July 23, 2023 at: https://qualitynet.cms.gov/inpatient
    PubMed