Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2257-3992
Short Communication

Early-Pregnancy Resilience Characteristics Before Versus During the COVID-19 Pandemic

1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Audra C. Fain
2   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine UCLA, Los Angeles, California
,
Tess E.K. Cersonsky
3   Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
,
Erika F. Werner
4   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
,
Emily S. Miller
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
,
Melissa A. Clark
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
5   Department of Health Services, Policy and Practice, Brown School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
,
1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
› Author Affiliations
Funding This work was supported by the National Institutes of Health (K23 HD103961, P20GM139767) and the Robert A. Winn Diversity in Clinical Trials Award Career Development Award (N.K.A.).

Abstract

Objective Resilience is associated with mental and somatic health benefits. Given the social, physical, and mental health toll of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, we examined whether the COVID-19 pandemic was associated with population-level changes in resilience among pregnant people.

Study Design Secondary analysis of a prospective cohort of nulliparous pregnant people <20 weeks' gestation from a single hospital. Participants completed baseline assessments of resilience characteristics, including dispositional optimism (DO), mindfulness, and proactive coping. For this analysis, participants recruited before the COVID-19 pandemic were compared with those recruited during the pandemic. The primary outcome was DO, assessed as a continuous score on the validated Revised Life Orientation Test. Secondary outcomes included continuous scores on mindfulness and proactive coping assessments. Bivariable analyses were completed using chi-squared and Mann–Whitney U tests. Multivariable linear regression compared resilience scores by recruitment time frame, controlling for confounders selected a priori: maternal age, education, and marital status.

Results Of the 300 participants, 152 (50.7%) were recruited prior to the pandemic. Demographic and pregnancy characteristics differed between groups: the during-pandemic group was older, had higher levels of education, and were more likely to be married/partnered. There were no significant differences in any of the resilience characteristics before versus during the pandemic in bivariable or multivariable analyses.

Conclusion In this cohort, there were no differences in early pregnancy resilience characteristics before versus during the COVID-19 pandemic. This affirms that on a population level, resilience is a stable metric, even in the setting of a global pandemic.

Key Points

  • Resilience is associated with mental and somatic health benefits.

  • No difference in early-pregnancy resilience in those recruited before versus during the pandemic.

  • Consistent with conceptualization of resilience as an innate characteristic.



Publication History

Received: 16 June 2023

Accepted: 28 January 2024

Accepted Manuscript online:
30 January 2024

Article published online:
19 February 2024

© 2024. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA

 
  • References

  • 1 Paudel J. Home alone: implications of COVID-19 for mental health. Soc Sci Med 2021; 285: 114259
  • 2 Jin Y, Murray L. Perinatal mental health and women's lived experience of the COVID-19 pandemic: a scoping review of the qualitative literature 2020-2021. Midwifery 2023; 123: 103706
  • 3 Horstman HK, Leverenz A, Morrison S. et al. Pregnancy during the COVID-19 pandemic: communicated narrative sense-making and resilience. Health Commun 2024; 39 (02) 205-215
  • 4 Wall S, Dempsey M. The effect of COVID-19 lockdowns on women's perinatal mental health: a systematic review. Women Birth 2023; 36 (01) 47-55
  • 5 ACOG Committee Opinion No. ACOG committee opinion no. 757: screening for perinatal depression. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132 (05) e208-e212
  • 6 Surkan PJ, Sakyi KS, Christian P. et al. Risk of depressive symptoms associated with morbidity in postpartum women in rural Bangladesh. Matern Child Health J 2017; 21 (10) 1890-1900
  • 7 Brown CC, Adams CE, George KE, Moore JE. Mental health conditions increase severe maternal morbidity by 50 percent and cost $102 million yearly in the United States. Health Aff (Millwood) 2021; 40 (10) 1575-1584
  • 8 Goodman JH. Perinatal depression and infant mental health. Arch Psychiatr Nurs 2019; 33 (03) 217-224
  • 9 Gotlib IH, Buthmann JL, Miller JG. The functioning of offspring of depressed parents: current status, unresolved issues, and future directions. Annu Rev Dev Psychol 2023; 5 (01) 375-397
  • 10 Davydov DM, Stewart R, Ritchie K, Chaudieu I. Resilience and mental health. Clin Psychol Rev 2010; 30 (05) 479-495
  • 11 Studniczek A, Kossakowska K. Experiencing pregnancy during the COVID-19 lockdown in Poland: a cross-sectional study of the mediating effect of resiliency on prenatal depression symptoms. Behav Sci (Basel) 2022; 12 (10) 371
  • 12 Puertas-Gonzalez JA, Mariño-Narvaez C, Romero-Gonzalez B, Vilar-López R, Peralta-Ramirez MI. Resilience, stress and anxiety in pregnancy before and throughout the pandemic: a structural equation modelling approach. Curr Psychol NB NJ 2022; 1-11
  • 13 Panzeri A, Bertamini M, Butter S. et al. Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: the ecological resilience model. PLoS One 2021; 16 (08) e0256041
  • 14 Thieme M, Einenkel J, Zenger M, Hinz A. Optimism, pessimism and self-efficacy in female cancer patients. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2017; 47 (09) 849-855
  • 15 Huffman JC, Legler S, Millstein RA. et al. Does timeframe adjustment of the Life Orientation Test-Revised assess optimism as a state? Data from the PEACE-III trial in patients with heart disease. J Posit Psychol 2019; 14 (06) 799-806
  • 16 Greenglass E, Schwarzer R, Jakubiec D, Fiksenbaum L, Taubert S. The proactive coping inventory (PCI): a multidimensional research instrument. Paper presented at: 20th International Conference of the Stress and Anxiety Research Society (STAR); July 12-14 1999; Cracow, Poland
  • 17 Nikopoulou VA, Gliatas I, Blekas A. et al. Uncertainty, stress, and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic in Greece. J Nerv Ment Dis 2022; 210 (04) 249-256
  • 18 CDC. 1.4 Congenital Anomalies - Definitions. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. November 19, 2020. Accessed November 4, 2022 at: https://www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/birthdefects/surveillancemanual/chapters/chapter-1/chapter1-4.html
  • 19 Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): a reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J Pers Soc Psychol 1994; 67 (06) 1063-78
  • 20 Brown KW, Ryan RM. The benefits of being present: mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J Pers Soc Psychol 2003; 84 (04) 822-848