PDF herunterladen
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd
DOI: 10.1055/a-2519-4324
CME-Fortbildung

Patientenselektion für Multifokallinsen

Patient selection for multifocal intraocular lenses
Ramin Khoramnia 
,
Tadas Naujokaitis 
› Weitere Informationen
Auch verfügbar auf
    Lizenzen und Reprints

Ein wichtiger Faktor, um eine hohe Patientenzufriedenheit mit multifokalen Intraokularlinsen (mIOL) zu erreichen, ist die sorgfältige Patientenauswahl. Das gleiche Linsenimplantat kann bei verschiedenen Patienten zu komplett unterschiedlichen Ergebnissen führen. Obwohl das postoperative Ergebnis nicht immer vorhersagbar ist, gibt es einige Hinweise, wie sich die objektiven und subjektiven Ergebnisse durch eine sorgfältige Patientenselektion verbessern lassen.

Abstract

Patient selection is the key to patient satisfaction with multifocal intraocular lenses (mIOLs). While multifocality provides spectacle independence, it is associated with potentially bothersome side effects inherent in multifocal optics. Photic phenomena such as halos and glare, as well as loss of contrast in low light environments, can be potentially problematic in visually demanding occupations and leisure activities. The use of mIOLs may also be disadvantageous in patients with certain comorbidities that affect vision or increase the risk of complications. In addition, unilateral mIOL implantation, preoperative myopia, postoperative ametropia, unrealistic patient expectations and certain personality traits may lead to lower patient satisfaction with mIOLs. Healthy, hyperopic patients with presbyopia or cataracts, a desire for spectacle independence and a willingness to compromise tend to achieve the highest satisfaction with mIOLs.

Kernaussagen

  • Patientenselektion ist entscheidend für die postoperative Patientenzufriedenheit mit multifokalen Intraokularlinsen.

  • Vor- und Nachteile der multifokalen Optik sollten im Einzelfall abgewogen werden.

  • Bei Wunsch nach Brillenunabhängigkeit sind die individuellen Sehbedürfnisse, berufliche Tätigkeiten, Hobbys, Persönlichkeit und Erwartungen der Patienten zu berücksichtigen.

  • Die präoperative Refraktion, Komorbiditäten, Voroperationen und das Patientenalter sind ebenfalls wichtige Faktoren bei der Patientenselektion für multifokale Intraokularlinsen.

  • Kompromissbereite presbyope hyperope Patienten ohne relevante Vorerkrankungen sind für die Implantation multifokaler Intraokularlinsen am besten geeignet.

Schlüsselwörter

Intraokularlinsen - multifokale IOL - Patientenselektion

Keywords

Intraocular lenses - multifocal IOL - patient selection


Publikationsverlauf

Artikel online veröffentlicht:
19. Mai 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany

 

  • Literatur

  • 1 Breyer DRH, Kaymak H, Ax T. et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila) 2017; 6: 339-349
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 2 Rampat R, Gatinel D. Multifocal and extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses in 2020. Ophthalmology 2021; 128: e164-e185
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 3 Naujokaitis T, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. et al. Complementary system vs conventional trifocal intraocular lens: comparison of optical quality metrics and unwanted light distribution. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023; 49: 84-90
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 4 Gatinel D, Loicq J. Clinically relevant optical properties of bifocal, trifocal, and extended depth of focus intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 273-280
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 5 Jin S, Friedman DS, Cao K. et al. Comparison of postoperative visual performance between bifocal and trifocal intraocular Lens based on randomized controlled trails: a meta-analysis. BMC Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 78
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 6 Shen Z, Lin Y, Zhu Y. et al. Clinical comparison of patient outcomes following implantation of trifocal or bifocal intraocular lenses: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2017; 7: 45337
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 7 Clavé L, Torrents A, Millán MS. Visual acuity at various distances and defocus curve: a good match. Photonics 2022; 9: 85
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 8 Kohnen T, Lemp-Hull J, Suryakumar R. Defocus curves: focusing on factors influencing assessment. J Cataract Refract Surg 2022; 48: 961-968
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 9 Xu X, Zhu MM, Zou HD. Refractive versus diffractive multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Refract Surg 2014; 30: 634-644
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 10 Kohnen T, Herzog M, Hemkeppler E. et al. Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular lens following removal of the crystalline lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2017; 184: 52-62
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 11 Bellucci C, Mora P, Tedesco SA. et al. Comparison of objective and subjective visual outcomes between pentafocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lenses. J Refract Surg 2024; 40: e604-e613
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 12 Khoramnia R, Baur ID, Łabuz G. et al. Functional outcomes after bilateral refractive lens exchange with a continuous-range-of-vision intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023; 49: 1011-1017
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 13 Khoramnia R, Naujokaitis T, Łabuz G. et al. [Complex optical systems for individualized correction of presbyopia]. Ophthalmologie 2024; 121: 706-713
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 14 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Łabuz G. et al. Clinical evaluation of reading performance in refractive lens exchange with a diffractive continuous-range-of-vision intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2023; 250: 25-37
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 15 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Yildirim TM. et al. Reversibility of the duet procedure: Bilateral exchange of a supplementary trifocal sulcus-fixated intraocular lens for correction of a postoperative refractive error. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2020; 20
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 16 Mackenbrock LHB, Auffarth GU, Khoramnia R. [Reversible Trifocality in a young cataract patient: polypseudophakia imaged with anterior segment OCT]. Ophthalmologie 2023; 120: 791
    PubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 17 Łabuz G, Khoramnia R, Yan W. et al. Characterizing glare effects associated with diffractive optics in presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. J Cataract Refract Surg 2024; 50: 413-419
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 18 Alio JL, Plaza-Puche AB, Férnandez-Buenaga R. et al. Multifocal intraocular lenses: An overview. Surv Ophthalmol 2017; 62: 611-634
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 19 Naujokaitis T, Zhao L, Scharf D. et al. Monofocal intraocular lens with enhanced intermediate function as substitute for multifocal intraocular lens in positive dysphotopsia. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 26
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 20 1stQ Deutschland GmbH. RALV Datenblatt. Zugriff am 15. Februar 2025 unter: https://www.1stq.de/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/2024_RALV_Datenblatt_9013.pdf
    PubMed
  • 21 Baur ID, Müller A, Łabuz G. et al. Refractive lens exchange: a review. Klin Monbl Augenheilkd 2024; 241: 893-904
    Thieme ConnectPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 22 Palomo-Álvarez C, Puell MC. Capacity of straylight and disk halo size to diagnose cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015; 41: 2069-2074
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 23 Sahin O, Pennos A, Ginis H. et al. Optical measurement of straylight in eyes with cataract. J Refract Surg 2016; 32: 846-850
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 24 Khoramnia R, Naujokaitis T, Baur ID. et al. Functional outcomes after refractive lens exchange with implantation of a glistening-free diffractive trifocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2024; 268: 296-305
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 25 Asena L, Kırcı Dogan İ, Oto S. et al. Comparison of visual performance and quality of life with a new nondiffractive EDOF intraocular lens and a trifocal intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2023; 49: 504-511
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 26 Ribeiro F, Ferreira TB, Silva D. et al. Analysis of daily visual habits in a presbyopic population. J Ophthalmol 2023; 2023
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 27 Böhm M, Hemkeppler E, Herzog M. et al. Comparison of a panfocal and trifocal diffractive intraocular lens after femtosecond laser-assisted lens surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2018; 44: 1454-1462
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 28 Rudalevicius P, Lekaviciene R, Auffarth GU. et al. Relations between patient personality and patients’ dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: clinical study based on the five factor inventory personality evaluation. Eye (Lond) 2020; 34: 717-724
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 29 Hu JQ, Sarkar R, Sella R. et al. Cost-effectiveness analysis of multifocal intraocular lenses compared to monofocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 2019; 208: 305-312
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 30 Kommission Refraktive Chirurgie (KRC). Bewertung und Qualitätssicherung refraktiv-chirurgischer Eingriffe durch die DOG und den BVA – KRC-Empfehlungen. Stand Mai 2024. Zugriff am 15. Februar 2025 unter: https://dog.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/11/2024/06/KRC-Empfehlungen-28.5.24.pdf
    PubMed
  • 31 Goto S, Maeda N. Corneal Topography for intraocular lens selection in refractive cataract surgery. Ophthalmology 2021; 128: e142-e152
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 32 Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 992-997
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 33 Bucci jr FA. Patient satisfaction, visual outcomes, and regression analysis in post-LASIK patients implanted with multifocal, EDOF, or monofocal IOLs. Eye Contact Lens 2023; 49: 160-167
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 34 Anders P, Anders LM, Barbara A. et al. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes with previous corneal refractive surgery. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 2022; 14
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 35 Mok KH, Lee VW. Effect of optical zone ablation diameter on LASIK-induced higher order optical aberrations. J Refract Surg 2005; 21: 141-143
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 36 Padmanabhan P, Mrochen M, Viswanathan D. et al. Wavefront aberrations in eyes with decentered ablations. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009; 35: 695-702
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 37 Naujokaitis T, Hallak MK, Blöck L. et al. Refractive outcomes of cataract surgery in patients with intrastromal femtosecond laser treatment of presbyopia (INTRACOR). J Refract Surg 2023; 39: 676-682
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 38 Kohnen T, Mahmoud K, Bühren J. Comparison of corneal higher-order aberrations induced by myopic and hyperopic LASIK. Ophthalmology 2005; 112: 1692
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 39 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Łabuz G. et al. Presbyopia correction after previous Intracor treatment: Combined implantation of a small-aperture and a non-diffractive extended-depth-of-focus lens. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2022; 25
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 40 Tandogan T, Son HS, Choi CY. et al. Laboratory evaluation of the influence of decentration and pupil size on the optical performance of a monofocal, bifocal, and trifocal intraocular lens. J Refract Surg 2017; 33: 808-812
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 41 Petermeier K, Gekeler F, Spitzer MS. et al. Implantation of the multifocal ReSTOR apodised diffractive intraocular lens in adult anisometropic patients with mild to moderate amblyopia. Br J Ophthalmol 2009; 93: 1296-1301
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 42 Yildirim TM, Auffarth GU, Son HS. et al. Bilateral trifocal IOL implantation in a pediatric case of cataract following steroid-therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia. Am J Ophthalmol Case Rep 2019; 13: 46-49
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar
  • 43 Baur ID, Auffarth GU, Łabuz G. et al. Clinical outcomes in patients after duet procedure for reversible trifocality using a supplementary trifocal intraocular lens. Am J Ophthalmol 2022; 241: 217-226
    CrossrefPubMedSuche in Google Scholar