RSS-Feed abonnieren

DOI: 10.1055/a-2651-4971
Interpregnancy Interval as a Determinant of Outcome in Women with Prophylactic Cerclage Following Preterm Birth or Late Miscarriage
Artikel in mehreren Sprachen: English | deutschAuthors

Abstract
Background
Patients with a history of late miscarriage or preterm birth in a previous pregnancy may have a cerclage with total cervical closure (TCC) in a subsequent pregnancy to increase the likelihood of term delivery. This analysis investigates whether the interpregnancy interval influences the outcome of the subsequent pregnancy.
Methods
In a retrospective cohort of 131 women who received a prophylactic cerclage with TCC following late miscarriage or preterm birth, the impact of the interpregnancy interval on pregnancy outcome was evaluated. Women were divided into three interpregnancy interval groups (0–6, 6–12, and > 12 months). Outcomes assessed included late miscarriage, preterm birth (stratified by gestational age), term birth (≥ 37+0 weeks of gestation), and neonatal parameters (Apgar scores, umbilical cord pH, birth weight, and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit [NICU]).
Results
An interpregnancy interval of more than 12 months was associated with the highest rate of term deliveries (85.4%) and the best neonatal outcomes overall. This group had the lowest NICU admission rates, the highest birth weights, and the best Apgar scores. Very early preterm births (< 28+0 weeks) were observed more frequently in the shorter interval groups. Umbilical artery pH showed no correlation with the interpregnancy interval.
Conclusion
A longer interpregnancy interval of more than 12 months was associated with a higher rate of deliveries ≥ 37+0 weeks and improved fetal outcomes in women with prophylactic cerclage and TCC after prior preterm birth or late miscarriage. In contrast, very early preterm births (< 28+0 weeks) occurred more often with shorter intervals.
Keywords
cerclage - interpregnancy interval - premature birth - cervical insufficiency - late miscarriagePublikationsverlauf
Eingereicht: 02. Mai 2025
Angenommen nach Revision: 07. Juli 2025
Artikel online veröffentlicht:
29. August 2025
© 2025. The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References/Literatur
- 1 Bouras G, Dannheim I, Horsch A. Preterm birth and maternal psychological health. J Health Psychol 2015; 20: 1388-1396
- 2 Lothrop H. Gute Hoffnung, jähes Ende: Fehlgeburt, Totgeburt und Verluste in der frühen Lebenszeit. Begleitung und neue Hoffnung für Eltern. Vollständig überarbeitete Neuausgabe. München: Kösel-Verlag; 2016
- 3 Fernández-Basanta S, Dahl-Cortizo C, Coronado C. et al. Pregnancy after perinatal loss: A meta-ethnography from a women’s perspective. Midwifery 2023; 124: 103762
- 4 World Health Organization. Report of a WHO technical consultation on birth spacing: Geneva, Switzerland, 13–15 June 2005. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006. Zugriff am 22. August 2025 unter: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/924159484X
- 5 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 8: Interpregnancy Care. Obstet Gynecol 2019; 133: e51-e72
- 6 Wang Y, Zeng C, Chen Y. et al. Short interpregnancy interval can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes: A meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9: 922053
- 7 Chan S, Dong X. Effectiveness of Prophylactic Transvaginal Cervical Cerclage in Improving Clinical Outcomes among Pregnant Women with Cervical Insufficiency: Meta-Analysis. Open J Intern Med 2024; 14: 228-246
- 8 Giouleka S, Boureka E, Tsakiridis I. et al. Cervical Cerclage: A comprehensive Review of Major Guideline. Obstet Gynecol Surv 2023; 78: 544-553
- 9 Issah A, Diacci R, Williams KP. et al. McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in women requiring a prophylactic cerclage: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev 2021; 10: 130
- 10 McDonald IA. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 1957; 64: 346-350
- 11 Shirodkar VN. A new method of operative treatment for habitual abortion in the second trimester of pregnancy. Antiseptic 1955; 52: 299
- 12 Berger R, Abele H, Bahlmann F. et al. Prevention and Therapy of Preterm Birth. Guideline of the DGGG, OEGGG and SGGG (S2k-Level, AWMF Registry Number 015/025, September 2022) – Part 1. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83: 547-568
- 13 Kindinger LM, MacIntyre DA, Lee YS. et al. Relationship between vaginal microbial dysbiosis, inflammation, and pregnancy outcomes in cervical cerclage. Sci Transl Med 2016; 8: 350ra102
- 14 Mehta CR, Patel NR. A network algorithm for performing Fisher’s exact test in r×c contingency tables. J Am Stat Assoc 1983; 78: 427-434
- 15 Shapiro SS, Wilk MB. An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 1965; 52: 591-611
- 16 Kruskal WH, Wallis WA. Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 1952; 47: 583-621
- 17 Conde-Agudelo A, Rosas-Bermúdez A, Kafury-Goeta AC. Birth spacing and risk of adverse perinatal outcomes: a meta-analysis. JAMA 2006; 295: 1809-1813
- 18 Tanigawa K, Ikehara S, Cui M. et al. Association Between Interpregnancy Interval and Risk of Preterm Birth and Its Modification by Folate Intake: The Japan Environment and Children's Study. J Epidemiol 2023; 33: 113-119
- 19 Saling E. Der frühe totale Muttermundverschluss zur Vermeidung habitueller Aborte und Frühgeburten. Z Geburtsh Perinat 1981; 185: 259-261
- 20 Saling E, Schumacher E. Der operative Totale Muttermund-Verschluss (TMV). Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 1996; 200: 82-87
- 21 Szendi B. Vollständiges Zusammennähen des äußeren Muttermundes auf blutigem Wege zur Verhinderung von fortgeschrittenem Abortus und Frühgeburten. Zentralbl Gynakol 1961; 83: 1083-1087
- 22 Zayyan M, Suhyb SR, Laurel NO. The Use of Total Cervical Occlusion along with McDonald Cerclage in Patients with Recurrent Miscarriage or Preterm Deliveries. Oman Med J 2012; 27: 63-65
- 23 Braun J, Klockenbusch W. Nutzen von Pessar, Cerclage und Muttermundverschluss für das Überleben von Frühgeborenen. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2016; 76: 942-945
- 24 Wen X, Liang W, Zhai J. et al. The association between interpregnancy intervals and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2025; 25: 226
- 25 Ni W, Gao X, Su X. et al. Birth spacing and risk of adverse pregnancy and birth outcomes: A systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2023; 102: 1618-1633
- 26 Gudnadottir U, Debelius J, Du J. et al. The vaginal microbiome and the risk of preterm birth: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Sci Rep 2022; 12: 7926
- 27 Odogwu NM. Role of short interpregnancy interval, birth mode, birth practices, and the post-partum vaginal microbiome in preterm birth. Front Reprod Health 2023; 4: 1082199
- 28 Costello EK, DiGiulio DB, Robaczewska A. et al. Abrupt perturbation and delayed recovery of the vaginal ecosystem following childbirth. Nat Commun 2023; 14: 4141