Challenges with Access to Early Intervention Services Following NICU Discharge in California

Marinthea Richter; Polly Kellner; Jenny Kwon; Lisa G. Vargas; Manoj Biniwale; Amy Yeh; Roberta Pineda

doi:10.1055/a-2662-8594

American Journal of Perinatology, Inhaltsverzeichnis

Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2662-8594

Original Article

Challenges with Access to Early Intervention Services Following NICU Discharge in California

Marinthea Richter

¹Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

,

Polly Kellner

¹Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

,

Jenny Kwon

²Kaiser Permanente, Orange County, California

,

Lisa G. Vargas

³Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

⁴Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, Baylor College of Medicine at Christus Children's Hospital, San Antonio, Texas

,

Manoj Biniwale

⁵Division of Neonatology, Cedars Sinai Guerin Children's, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California

,

Amy Yeh

³Division of General Pediatrics, Department of Pediatrics, University of Southern California, Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, California

,

Roberta Pineda

¹Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

⁶Gehr Family Center for Health Systems Science and Innovation, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California

⁷Washington University, Program in Occupational Therapy, St. Louis, Missouri

› Institutsangaben

Abstract

Objective

Early alterations in function are evident in preterm infants during their neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization. Therefore, it is common for preterm infants to be referred to early intervention (EI) as they transition from hospital to home. Access to EI is often assumed, but understanding gaps in service delivery is important. The aims of this project were to (1) determine rates of EI access at the first high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) appointment (4–8 months corrected age) at a safety-net hospital in Los Angeles, and (2) identify relationships between infant, clinic, and EI factors with EI service uptake.

Study Design

Through a retrospective medical record review, EI utilization at the first HRIF appointment was documented among 189 NICU-graduate preterm infants born ≤32 weeks estimated gestational age who had their first HRIF visit (4–8 months corrected age) between January 2019 and November 2020.

Results

Ninety-two (49%) of the infants were receiving EI at their first HRIF appointment at 4 to 8 months corrected age. Extremely preterm infants were more likely to receive EI services than those born very preterm (p = 0.005). No other relationships between factors were identified.

Conclusion

Successful uptake of EI services cannot be assumed. Challenges with access to EI persist, even within systems designed to foster identification and access to therapy following NICU discharge. Future research is needed to identify the reasons for the lack of access to EI and to identify the impact of different types of programming to aid access to EI for high-risk populations.

Key Points

EI access for a safety-net population is challenging.
Only 49% of preterm infants received EI at 4 to 8 months corrected age.
Extremely preterm infants were more likely to access EI.
EI access was higher for infants hospitalized in the NICU associated with the HRIF.

Keywords

healthcare service delivery - health equity - therapy - infant - preterm

Volltext

Referenzen

References
1 Centers for Disease Control. What is Early Intervention?. 2022
2 Department of Developmental Services. Early Start eligibility changes. 2022 . Accessed July 24, 2025 at: https://www.dds.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/Early_Start_Eligibility_Changes_07272022.pdf
3 CA Department of Developmental Services. What is Early Start?. 2025
4 C. alifornia Department of Developmental Services. Regional Center Services and Descriptions. 2019
5 Glass HC, Costarino AT, Stayer SA, Brett CM, Cladis F, Davis PJ. Outcomes for extremely premature infants. Anesth Analg 2015; 120 (06) 1337-1351
6 Pierrat V, Marchand-Martin L, Arnaud C. et al; EPIPAGE-2 writing group. Neurodevelopmental outcome at 2 years for preterm children born at 22 to 34 weeks' gestation in France in 2011: EPIPAGE-2 cohort study. BMJ 2017; 358: j3448
7 Little AA, Kamholz K, Corwin BK, Barrero-Castillero A, Wang CJ. Understanding barriers to early intervention services for preterm infants: lessons from two states. Acad Pediatr 2015; 15 (04) 430-438
8 California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative. What is HRIF?. Center for Academic Medicine Neonatology; 2023
9 Department of Health Care Services. High risk infant follow-up (HRIF) program services. 2016
10 Lakshmanan A, Sunshine I, Escobar CM. et al. Connecting to early intervention services after neonatal intensive care unit discharge in a Medicaid sample. Acad Pediatr 2022; 22 (02) 253-262
11 Pineda R, Heiny E, Roussin J, Nellis P, Bogan K, Smith J. Implementation of the baby bridge program reduces timing between NICU discharge and therapy activation. J Early Interv 2020; 42: 275-296
12 McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman M. et al. Child characteristics and early intervention referral and receipt of services: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Pediatr 2020; 20 (01) 84
13 Lee YH. The paradox of early intervention: families' participation driven by professionals throughout the service process. Int J Child Care Educ Policy 2015; 9: 1-19
14 Kang-Yi CD, Grinker RR, Beidas R. et al. Influence of community-level cultural beliefs about Autism on families' and professionals' care for children. Transcult Psychiatry 2018; 55 (05) 623-647
15 Litt JS, Perrin JM. Influence of clinical and sociodemographic characteristics on early intervention enrollment after NICU discharge. J Early Interv 2014; 36: 37-48
16 McArthur M, Winkworth G. Give them a break: how stigma impacts on younger mothers accessing early and supportive help in Australia. Br J Soc Work 2018; 48: 1277-1295
17 Cole B, Pickard K, Stredler-Brown A. Report on the use of telehealth in early intervention in Colorado: strengths and challenges with telehealth as a service delivery method. Int J Telerehabil 2019; 11 (01) 33-40
18 Lakshmanan A, Kubicek K, Williams R. et al. Viewpoints from families for improving transition from NICU-to-home for infants with medical complexity at a safety net hospital: a qualitative study. BMC Pediatr 2019; 19 (01) 223
19 McManus BM, Richardson Z, Schenkman M, Murphy N, Morrato EH. Timing and intensity of early intervention service use and outcomes among a safety-net population of children. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2 (01) e187529
20 Nwabara O, Rogers C, Inder T, Pineda R. Early therapy services following neonatal intensive care unit discharge. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2017; 37 (04) 414-424
21 Roberts MY, Thornhill L, Lee J. et al. The impact of COVID-19 on Illinois early intervention services. Am J Speech Lang Pathol 2022; 31 (02) 974-981
22 Thompson KL, Meredith J, Smith RF, Clarke M, Steinbrenner J. Pediatric feeding academic and post-graduate training experiences of speech-language pathologists and occupational therapists in the United States: differences, preferences, and gaps. J Clinical Practice Speech-Language Pathology 2025; 1-244
23 Pineda R, Liszka L, Tran P, Kwon J, Inder T. Neurobehavior in very preterm infants with low medical risk and full-term infants. J Perinatol 2022; 42 (10) 1400-1408
24 Meether M, Bush CN, Richter M, Pineda R. Neurobehaviour of very preterm infants at term equivalent age is related to early childhood outcomes. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110 (04) 1181-1188
25 Pineda R, Liszka L, Inder T. Early neurobehavior at 30 weeks postmenstrual age is related to outcome at term equivalent age. Early Hum Dev 2020; 146: 105057
26 Craciunoiu O, Holsti L. A systematic review of the predictive validity of neurobehavioral assessments during the preterm period. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr 2017; 37 (03) 292-307
27 Madlinger-Lewis L, Reynolds L, Zarem C, Crapnell T, Inder T, Pineda R. The effects of alternative positioning on preterm infants in the neonatal intensive care unit: a randomized clinical trial. Res Dev Disabil 2014; 35 (02) 490-497
28 Liu J, Bann C, Lester B. et al. Neonatal neurobehavior predicts medical and behavioral outcome. Pediatrics 2010; 125 (01) e90-e98
29 Nugent JK, Bartlett JD, Von Ende A, Valim C. The effects of the newborn behavioral observations (NBO) system on sensitivity in mother-infant interactions. Infants Young Child 2017; 30: 257-268
30 Tronick E, Lester BM. Grandchild of the NBAS: the NICU network neurobehavioral scale (NNNS): a review of the research using the NNNS. J Child Adolesc Psychiatr Nurs 2013; 26 (03) 193-203
31 Wilke NG, Howard AH, Pop D. Data-informed recommendations for services providers working with vulnerable children and families during the COVID-19 pandemic. Child Abuse Negl 2020; 110 (Pt 2): 104642
32 US Department of Education. State performance plan/annual performance report: Part C. 2022
33 Nehra V, Pici M, Visintainer P, Kase JS. Indicators of compliance for developmental follow-up of infants discharged from a regional NICU. J Perinat Med 2009; 37 (06) 677-681
34 Cox E, Awe M, Sabu S, Tumin D, Akpan US. Does greater distance from the hospital exacerbate socioeconomic barriers to neonatal intensive care unit clinic attendance?. J Rural Med 2023; 18 (02) 55-61
35 Hintz SR, Gould JB, Bennett MV. et al. Referral of very low birth weight infants to high-risk follow-up at neonatal intensive care unit discharge varies widely across California. J Pediatr 2015; 166 (02) 289-295
36 Hintz SR, Gould JB, Bennett MV. et al. Factors associated with successful first high-risk infant clinic visit for very low birth weight infants in California. J Pediatr 2019; 210: 91-98.e1
37 Tang BG, Lee HC, Gray EE, Gould JB, Hintz SR. Programmatic and administrative barriers to high-risk infant follow-up care. Am J Perinatol 2018; 35 (10) 940-945
38 Mirzaian CB, Solomon O, Setaghiyan H. et al. Enhancing access to early intervention by including parent navigators with lived experience in a pediatric medical home. Fam Syst Health 2024; 42 (03) 405-416