Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2743-4429
Impact of Postnatal Heart Rate Assessment on Delayed Cord Clamping in Neonatal Resuscitation
Authors
Abstract
Objective
This study aimed to determine whether immediate postnatal heart rate (HR) assessment during delayed cord clamping (DCC) influences the clinical decision-making of neonatal resuscitation providers.
Study Design
The decision to perform or defer DCC primarily relies on subjective parameters, potentially leading to variations in subsequent steps of the resuscitation algorithm. In this study, HR, a numerical parameter, was introduced during DCC. Ten subjects completed a total of 60 short scenarios simulating DCC for a 27-week preterm manikin. Each subject experienced two consecutive sets (control vs. test) of three scenarios with predefined HR ranges (<60, 60–99, and ≥ 100/minute) presented in random order. In control scenarios, subjects participated in the DCC procedure per usual practice. In test scenarios, they manually measured HR during DCC. Objective variables and subjective questionnaire responses were collected.
Results
The mean DCC duration significantly increased for HR 60 to 99/minute (45.4 vs. 55.3 seconds, p = 0.035) and HR ≥ 100/minute (37.1 vs. 63.7 seconds, p = 0.011) scenarios in the test group compared with the control. For the HR < 60/minute scenario, mean DCC duration and time to ECG attachment tended to be shorter in the test group (45.4 vs. 34.6 and 89.7 vs. 56.3 seconds, respectively). In this HR range, initiation of respiratory support occurred significantly earlier in the test group (mean 72.7 vs. 47.6 seconds, p = 0.020). According to the questionnaire, 2 (20%) subjects believed tone and respiratory effort were sufficient for DCC decision-making. Seven (70%) subjects perceived that HR assessment during DCC had a “strong” or “very strong” impact on the decision to delay or proceed with cord clamping, with confidence levels rising from a median of 3 to 4 on a 5-point Likert scale.
Conclusion
Assessing immediate postnatal HR during DCC appears to impact clinical decision-making for providers, implying the potential for enhancing uniformity of decisions among healthcare professionals surrounding DCC.
Key Points
-
The decision to perform or defer DCC primarily relies on subjective parameters.
-
HR assessment during DCC appears to impact clinical decision-making for providers.
-
Assessing HR during DCC may potentially enhance uniformity of decisions among HCPs.
Publication History
Received: 03 September 2025
Accepted: 10 November 2025
Article published online:
04 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA
-
References
- 1 Jasani B, Torgalkar R, Ye XY, Syed S, Shah PS. Association of umbilical cord management strategies with outcomes of preterm infants: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. JAMA Pediatr 2021; 175 (04) e210102
- 2 Chartrand L, Barrington KJ, Dodin P, Villeneuve A. Delayed cord clamping in preterm twin infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2025; 232 (03) 271-279.e1
- 3 Fogarty M, Osborn DA, Askie L. et al. Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2018; 218 (01) 1-18
- 4 Mercer JS, Vohr BR, McGrath MM, Padbury JF, Wallach M, Oh W. Delayed cord clamping in very preterm infants reduces the incidence of intraventricular hemorrhage and late-onset sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Pediatrics 2006; 117 (04) 1235-1242
- 5 Hemmati F, Sharma D, Namavar Jahromi B, Salarian L, Farahbakhsh N. Delayed cord clamping for prevention of intraventricular hemorrhage in preterm neonates: a randomized control trial. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2022; 35 (19) 3633-3639
- 6 Andersson O, Hellström-Westas L, Andersson D, Domellöf M. Effect of delayed versus early umbilical cord clamping on neonatal outcomes and iron status at 4 months: a randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2011; 343: d7157
- 7 McDonald SJ, Middleton P, Dowswell T, Morris PS. Effect of timing of umbilical cord clamping of term infants on maternal and neonatal outcomes. Evid Based Child Health 2014; 9 (02) 303-397
- 8 Katheria AC, Brown MK, Faksh A. et al. Delayed cord clamping in newborns born at term at risk for resuscitation: a feasibility randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr 2017; 187: 313-317.e1
- 9 Armstrong-Buisseret L, Powers K, Dorling J. et al. Randomised trial of cord clamping at very preterm birth: outcomes at 2 years. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2020; 105 (03) 292-298
- 10 Mercer JS, Erickson-Owens DA, Vohr BR. et al. Effects of placental transfusion on neonatal and 18 month outcomes in preterm infants: a randomized controlled trial. J Pediatr 2016; 168: 50-55.e1
- 11 Mercer JS, Vohr BR, Erickson-Owens DA, Padbury JF, Oh W. Seven-month developmental outcomes of very low birth weight infants enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of delayed versus immediate cord clamping. J Perinatol 2010; 30 (01) 11-16
- 12 Robledo KP, Tarnow-Mordi WO, Rieger I. et al; APTS Childhood Follow-up Study collaborators. Effects of delayed versus immediate umbilical cord clamping in reducing death or major disability at 2 years corrected age among very preterm infants (APTS): a multicentre, randomised clinical trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022; 6 (03) 150-157
- 13 Wyckoff MH, Singletary EM, Soar J. et al; COVID-19 Working Group. 2021 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations: summary from the basic life support; advanced life support; neonatal life support; education, implementation, and teams; first aid task forces; and the COVID-19 working group. Resuscitation 2021; 169: 229-311
- 14 American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists' Committee on Obstetric Practice. Delayed umbilical cord clamping after birth: ACOG committee opinion, number 814. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136 (06) e100-e106
- 15 Weiner GM, Zaichkin J. Textbook of Neonatal Resuscitation. 8th ed. ed. Itasca, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2021
- 16 World Health Organization. Guideline: Delayed Umbilical Cord Clamping for Improved Maternal and Infant Health and Nutrition Outcomes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2014
- 17 Yamada NK, Szyld E, Strand ML. et al; American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics. 2023 American Heart Association and American Academy of Pediatrics focused update on neonatal resuscitation: an update to the American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care. Circulation 2024; 149 (01) e157-e166
- 18 Wyckoff MH, Weiner CGM. Neonatal Life Support Collaborators. 2020 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations. Pediatrics 2021; 147 (Suppl. 01) e2020038505C
- 19 Chan S, Duck M, Frometa K. et al. Improving the rate of delayed cord clamping in preterm infants: a quality improvement project. Hosp Pediatr 2023; 13 (04) 292-299
- 20 Fairchild KD, Petroni GR, Varhegyi NE. et al; VentFirst Consortium. Ventilatory assistance before umbilical cord clamping in extremely preterm infants: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7 (05) e2411140
- 21 Harris PA, Taylor R, Minor BL. et al; REDCap Consortium. The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners. J Biomed Inform 2019; 95: 103208
- 22 Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform 2009; 42 (02) 377-381
- 23 Seidler AL, Aberoumand M, Hunter KE. et al; iCOMP Collaborators. Deferred cord clamping, cord milking, and immediate cord clamping at preterm birth: a systematic review and individual participant data meta-analysis. Lancet 2023; 402 (10418): 2209-2222
- 24 Bhatt S, Alison BJ, Wallace EM. et al. Delaying cord clamping until ventilation onset improves cardiovascular function at birth in preterm lambs. J Physiol 2013; 591 (08) 2113-2126
- 25 Niermeyer S, Velaphi S. Promoting physiologic transition at birth: re-examining resuscitation and the timing of cord clamping. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med 2013; 18 (06) 385-392
- 26 Boere I, Roest AA, Wallace E. et al. Umbilical blood flow patterns directly after birth before delayed cord clamping. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2015; 100 (02) F121-F125
- 27 Henry C, Shipley L, Ward C. et al. Accurate neonatal heart rate monitoring using a new wireless, cap mounted device. Acta Paediatr 2021; 110 (01) 72-78
- 28 Peterson J, Jennings C, Mahaveer A. A clinical evaluation and acceptability study of the innovative SurePulse VS wireless heart rate monitor across the neonatal journey. Front Pediatr 2024; 12: 1355777
- 29 Pike H, Eilevstjønn J, Bjorland P, Linde J, Ersdal H, Rettedal S. Heart rate detection properties of dry-electrode ECG compared to conventional 3-lead gel-electrode ECG in newborns. BMC Res Notes 2021; 14 (01) 166
- 30 Katheria A, Poeltler D, Durham J. et al. Neonatal resuscitation with an intact cord: a randomized clinical trial. J Pediatr 2016; 178: 75-80.e3
- 31 Knol R, Brouwer E, Klumper FJCM. et al. Effectiveness of stabilization of preterm infants with intact umbilical cord using a purpose-built resuscitation table-study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Front Pediatr 2019; 7: 134
- 32 Katheria A, Lee HC, Knol R, Irvine L, Thomas S. A review of different resuscitation platforms during delayed cord clamping. J Perinatol 2021; 41 (07) 1540-1548
- 33 Chitkara R, Rajani AK, Oehlert JW, Lee HC, Epi MS, Halamek LP. The accuracy of human senses in the detection of neonatal heart rate during standardized simulated resuscitation: implications for delivery of care, training and technology design. Resuscitation 2013; 84 (03) 369-372
