Subscribe to RSS
DOI: 10.1055/a-2744-3045
One-Pot Synthesis of 1-Alkoxyisoquinoline Derivatives via Ru(II)-Catalyzed Aryl C−H Activation and Alkyne Annulation
Authors
A.D. gratefully acknowledges the SERB, DST (CRG/2022/01606) for the financial support.

Abstract
A one-pot synthesis of 1-alkoxyisoquinolines via ruthenium(II)-catalyzed aryl C−H activation and annulation with internal alkynes has been demonstrated. The reaction involves in situ generation of a benzimidate ester by the addition of nucleophilic alcohols and it acts as an “automatic directing group” (DGauto) for the aryl C−H activation and subsequent alkyne annulation. In contrast to conventional nitrogen-containing DG-assisted annulation approaches, this DGauto-assisted annulation of alkynes via C−H activation is advantageous as it reduces the number of reaction steps, simplifies the experimental procedure, and allows for easier handling of the corresponding precursors. Based on preliminary experimental observations, a plausible mechanism is disclosed for this transformation. Interestingly, most of the compounds show intense fluorescence emission, and their absorption and emission spectra are also presented in this work.
Publication History
Received: 07 October 2025
Accepted after revision: 11 November 2025
Article published online:
01 December 2025
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
Oswald-Hesse-Straße 50, 70469 Stuttgart, Germany
-
References
- 1a Phillipson JD, Roberts MF, Zenk MH. The Chemistry and Biology of Isoquinoline Alkaloids. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1985
- 1b Giri, Kumar PGS. Mini-Rev Med Chem 2010; 10: 568
- 1c Bhadra K, Kumar GS. Med Res Rev 2011; 31: 821
- 1d Khan AY, Kumar GS. Biophys Rev 2015; 7: 407
- 2 Villuendas P, Urriolabeitia EP. J Org Chem 2013; 78: 5254
- 3 Zhou Y, Hua R. J Org Chem 2021; 86: 8862
- 4a Alcock NW, Brown JM, Hulmes DI. Tetrahedron Asymmetry 1993; 4: 743
- 4b Sweetman BA, Muller-Bunz H, Guiry PJ. Tetrahedron Lett 2005; 46: 4643
- 4c Durola F, Sauvage J-P, Wenger OS. Chem Commun 2006; 171
- 5a Collado D, Perez-Inestrosa E, Suau R, Desvergne J-P, Bouas-Laurent H. Org Lett 2002; 4: 855
- 5b Su YJ, Huang HL, Li CL. et al. Adv Mater 2003; 15: 884
- 5c Zhao Q, Liu S, Shi M. et al. Inorg Chem 2006; 45: 6152
- 6 Pictet A, Spengler T. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1911; 44: 2030
- 7 Bischler A, Napieralski B. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1903; 1893: 26
- 9 Pictet A, Gams A. Ber Dtsch Chem Ges 1910; 43: 2384
- 10 Li JJ, Corey EJ. Name Reactions in Heterocyclic Chemistry. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2005: 375
- 11a Roesch KR, Larock RC. Org Lett 1999; 1: 553
- 11b Roesch KR, Zhang H, Larock RC. J Org Chem 2001; 66: 8042
- 11c Dai G, Larock RC. Org Lett 2002; 4: 193
- 11d Dai G, Larock RC. J Org Chem 2003; 68: 920
- 11e Roy S, Roy S, Neuenswander B, Hill D, Larock RC. J Comb Chem 2009; 11: 1061
- 12 Niu YN, Yan Z-Y, Gao G-L. et al. J Org Chem 2009; 74: 2893
- 13 Gao H, Zhang J. Adv Synth Catal 2009; 351: 85
- 14 Yu X, Wu J. J Comb Chem 2009; 11: 895
- 15 Sun L, Zhu Y, Lu P, Wang Y. Org Lett 2013; 15: 5894
- 16a Morimoto K, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Chem Lett 2011; 40: 600
- 16b Kim D-S, Park J-W, Jun C-H. Adv Synth Catal 2013; 355: 2667
- 16c Villuendas P, Urriolabeitia EP. J Org Chem 2013; 78: 5254
- 16d Ruiz S, Villuendas P, Ortuño MA, Lledós A, Urriolabeitia EP. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 8626
- 17a Guimond N, Fagnou K. J Am Chem Soc 2009; 131: 12050
- 17b Fukutani T, Umeda N, Hirano K, Satoh T, Miura M. Chem Commun 2009; 34: 5141
- 17c He R, Huang Z-T, Zheng Q-Y, Wang C. Angew Chem Int Ed 2014; 53: 4950
- 17d Li J, Ackermann L. Tetrahedron 2014; 70: 3342
- 17e Zhang S-S, Liu X-G, Chen S-Y. et al. Adv Synth Catal 2016; 358: 1705
- 17f Lu Q, Gressies S, Cembellin S, Klauck FJR, Daniliuc CG, Glorius F. Angew Chem Int Ed 2017; 56: 12778
- 17g Tian W-F, Wang D-P, Wang S-F, He K-H, Cao X-P, Li Y. Org Lett 2018; 20: 1421
- 17h Lu Q, Mondal S, Cembellin S, Gressies S, Glorius F. Chem Sci 2019; 10: 6560
- 18a Parthasarathy K, Cheng C-H. J Org Chem 2009; 74: 9359
- 18b Too PC, Wang Y-F, Chiba S. Org Lett 2010; 12: 5688
- 18c Zhang X, Chen D, Zhao M, Zhao J, Jia A, Li X. Adv Synth Catal 2011; 353: 719
- 18d Chinnagolla RK, Pimparkar S, Jeganmohan M. Org Lett 2012; 14: 3032
- 18e Sen M, Kalsi D, Sundararaju B. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 15529
- 18f Sun B, Yoshino T, Kanai M, Matsunaga S. Angew Chem Int Ed 2015; 54: 12968
- 18g Wang H, Koeller J, Liu W, Ackermann L. Chem Eur J 2015; 21: 15525
- 18h Zhu Z, Tang X, Li X, Wu W, Deng G, Jiang H. J Org Chem 2016; 81: 1401
- 18i Muralirajan K, Kuppusamy R, Prakash S, Cheng C-H. Adv Synth Catal 2016; 358: 774
- 18j Feng R, Ning H, Su H. et al. J Org Chem 2017; 82: 10408
- 18k Li X-C, Du C, Zhang H, Niu J-L, Song M-P. Org Lett 2019; 21: 2863
- 18l Yang J, Wu L, Xu H, Gao H, Zhou Z, Yi W. Org Lett 2019; 21: 9904
- 19a Kuai C, Wang L, Li B, Yang Z, Cui X. Org Lett 2017; 19: 2102
- 19b Manu MA, Rodriguez N, Gomez-Arrayas R, Carretero JC. Chem Eur J 2017; 23: 11669
- 20a Chuang S-C, Gandeepan P, Cheng C-H. Org Lett 2013; 15: 5750
- 20b Huang X-C, Yang X-H, Song R-J, Li J-H. J Org Chem 2014; 79: 1025
- 20c Han W, Zhang G, Li G, Huang H. Org Lett 2014; 16: 3532
- 20d Zhang S, Huang D, Xu G. et al. Org Biomol Chem 2015; 13: 7920
- 20e Pawar AB, Agarwal D, Lade DM. J Org Chem 2016; 81: 11409
- 20f Zhou S, Wang M, Wang L. et al. Org Lett 2016; 18: 5632
- 20g Deshmukh DS, Yadav PA, Bhanage BM. Org Biomol Chem 2019; 17: 3489
- 21 Zhou Y, Hua R. J Org Chem 2021; 86: 8862
- 22 Qiu L, Huang D, Xu G, Dai Z, Sun J. Org Lett 2015; 17: 1810
- 23 Hazarika N, Konwar M, Das A. Org Lett 2024; 26: 10447
- 24 General procedure for the synthesis of annulated compounds (GP)
A mixture of aryl/heteroaryl nitrile 1 (0.2 m = mol, 1 equiv), alkyne 2 (0.22 mmol, 1.1 equiv), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (0.005 mmol, 2.5 mol%), Cu(OAc)2·H2O (0.3 mmol, 1.5 equiv) was added to an oven-dried 15 mL pressure tube containing a magnetic stirring bar. Dry solvent ROH (100 equiv) was added to the tube and the mixture was stirred at 120 °C in a preheated oil bath for 8 h under air in a sealed tube. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained residue was purified by silica gel column chromatography using ethyl acetate and petroleum ether as the eluent to obtain the corresponding isoquinoline derivative
3,4-Diethyl-1-methoxyisoquinoline (3a)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2a, the title compound 3a was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 94% yield (40 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.22 (d, J = 7.8 Hz, 1H), 7.87 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.66–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.42 (m, 1H), 4.10 (s, 3H), 2.96 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.86 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.6, 150.4, 137.4, 130.1, 125.0, 124.6, 122.8, 122.3, 118.5, 53.3, 28.0, 20.5, 15.3, 14.3
3,4-Diethyl-1-methoxy-6-(trifluoromethyl)isoquinoline (3b)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1b and 2a, the title compound 3b was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 92% yield (52 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 8.14 (brs, 1H), 7.62 (dd, J = 8.7, 1.8 Hz, 1H), 4.12 (s, 3H), 2.98 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.88 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4, 152.3, 136.8, 131.7 (q, J = 31.9 Hz), 125.9, 125.3, 123.5, 122.8, 120.7 (q, J = 3.1 Hz), 120.4 (q, J = 4.4 Hz), 119.7, 53.5, 28.0, 20.5, 15.3, 14.1. 19F NMR (565 MHz, CDCl3): δ −62.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H17F3NO is 284.1257; found 284.1245
6-Bromo-3,4-diethyl-1-methoxyisoquinoline (3c)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1c and 2a, the title compound 3c was isolated as a white solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 83% yield (49 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.08 (d, J = 8.8 Hz, 1H), 8.00 (d, J = 1.7 Hz, 1H), 7.52–7.51 (m, 1H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 2.90 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.23 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.6, 152.0, 138.8, 128.3, 126.4, 125.4, 125.3, 121.5, 116.9, 53.4, 28.0, 20.5, 15.2, 14.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C14H17BrNO is 294.0489; found 294.0490
1-(3,4-Diethyl-1-methoxyisoquinolin-6-yl)ethan-1-one (3d)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1d and 2a, the title compound 3d was isolated as a light yellow oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 86% yield (44 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.47 (brs, 1H), 8.27 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.4 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (s, 3H), 3.01 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.73 (s, 3H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.27 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 198.5, 158.4, 151.7, 137.9, 136.9, 125.2, 124.1, 123.4, 123.3, 120.4, 53.5, 28.0, 27.1, 20.5, 15.5, 14.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C16H20NO2 is 258.1489; found 258.1486
3,4-Diethyl-1-methoxy-6-methylisoquinoline (3e)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1e and 2a, the title compound 3e was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 74% yield (34 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.12 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 7.28 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 4.09 (s, 3H), 2.94 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.85 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.54 (s, 3H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.6, 150.5, 140.1, 137.7, 127.0, 124.4, 122.1, 121.9, 116.6, 53.2, 28.0, 22.5, 20.4, 15.3, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H20NO is 230.1540; found 230.1543
3,4-Diethyl-1,6-dimethoxyisoquinoline (3f)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1f and 2a, the title compound 3f was isolated as a white solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.9) in 69% yield (34 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.14 (d, J = 9.0 Hz, 1H), 7.14 (d, J = 2.4 Hz, 1H), 7.08–7.07 (m, 1H), 4.08 (s, 3H), 3.94 (s, 3H), 2.92 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.85 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.34 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 1.25 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz CDCl3): δ 161.0, 158.6, 151.2, 139.4, 126.4, 121.7, 116.2, 113.4, 102.4, 55.4, 53.1, 28.1, 20.7, 14.9, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H20NO2 is 246.1489; found 246.1490
8,9-Diethyl-6-methoxy-[1,3]dioxolo[4,5-f]isoquinoline (3g)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1g and 2a, the title compound 3g was isolated as a light yellow oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 63% yield (32.6 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.85 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 7.08 (d, J = 8.7 Hz, 1H), 6.11 (s, 2H), 4.06 (s, 3H), 3.02 (q, J = 7.4 Hz, 2H), 2.80 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.31 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.20 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4, 151.0, 147.5, 140.8, 125.0, 120.0, 119.5, 115.5, 109.1, 101.1, 53.3, 27.4, 22.0, 16.2, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H18NO3 is 260.1282; found 260.1280
3,4-Diethyl-1-methoxy-2,6-naphthyridine (3h)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1h and 2a, the title compound 3h was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 88% yield (38 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 9.35 (s, 1H), 8.59 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 7.94 (d, J = 5.5 Hz, 1H), 4.10 (s, 3H), 3.04 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.87 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.33 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.28 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CdCl3): δ 157.9, 152.4, 148.0, 143.2, 131.7, 121.8, 121.5, 116.7, 53.6, 27.7, 19.8, 15.7, 14.1. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C13H17N2O is 217.1336; found 217.1334
4,5-Diethyl-7-methoxythieno[2,3-c]pyridine (3i)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1i and 2a, the title compound 3i was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 78% yield (34.5 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 7.58 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 7.35 (d, J = 5.3 Hz, 1H), 4.11 (s, 3H), 2.90 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.85 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.35 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.2, 151.6, 148.0, 130.5, 123.7, 122.1, 120.3, 53.3, 27.0, 22.5, 15.5, 14.4
1-Ethoxy-3,4-diethylisoquinoline (3j)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a, 2a and ethanol as a solvent, the title compound 3j was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 93% yield (42.6 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.25 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.42 (m, 1H), 4.56 (q, J = 7.1 Hz, 2H), 2.96 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 2.84 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.48 (t, J = 7.1 Hz, 3H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.24 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.3, 150.4, 137.4, 130.0, 124.8, 124.6, 122.7, 122.0, 118.5, 61.5, 28.0, 20.5, 15.3, 14.9, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H20NO is 230.1540; found 230.1546
3,4-Diethyl-1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy)isoquinoline (3k)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a, 2a, and 2,2,2-trifluoroethan-1-ol (TFE) as a solvent, the title compound 3k was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 96% yield (54.4 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.27 (d, J = 8.3 Hz, 1H), 7.91 (d, J = 8.4 Hz, 1H), 7.71–7.67 (m, 1H), 7.51–7.48 (m, 1H), 4.96 (q, J = 8.7 Hz, 2H), 2.98 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.86 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.32 (t, J = 7.5 Hz, 3H), 1.26 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 156.1, 149.9, 137.8, 130.6, 125.5, 124.4, 124.2, 122.9, 117.8, 62.1 (q, J = 35.8 Hz), 27.7, 20.5, 15.2, 14.1. 19F NMR (565 MHz, CDCl3) δ −73.6. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C15H17F3NO is 284.1257; found 284.1260
1-Methoxy-3,4-dipropylisoquinoline (3l)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2b, the title compound 3l was isolated as a colorless oil using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.9) in 87% yield (42.3 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.23 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.86 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H), 7.65–7.62 (m, 1H), 7.45–7.43 (m, 1H), 4.10 (s, 3H), 2.92–2.89 (m, 2H), 2.83–2.80 (m, 2H), 1.87–1.80 (m 2H), 1.68–1.61 (m, 2H), 1.08 (t, J = 7.3 Hz, 3H), 1.03 (t, J = 7.4 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.4, 149.5, 137.7, 130.0, 124.9, 124.5, 123.0, 121.4, 118.4, 53.3, 36.8, 29.6, 24.2, 23.0, 14.7, 14.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C16H22NO is 244.1696; found 244.1699
1-Methoxy-3,4-diphenylisoquinoline (3m)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2c, the title compound 3m was isolated as a pale yellow solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.7) in 81% yield (50.4 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.33 (d, J = 8.1 Hz, 1H), 7.57–7.52 (m, 3H), 7.44–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.38–7.33 (m, 3H), 7.25–7.23 (m, 2H), 7.21–7.17 (m, 3H), 4.23 (s, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.7, 147.0, 141.0, 138.6, 138.1, 131.8, 130.5, 128.5, 127.6, 127.1, 127.1, 126.3, 125.6, 125.0, 124.1, 118.6, 53.8
3,4-Bis(4-bromophenyl)-1-methoxyisoquinoline (3n)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2d, the title compound 3n was isolated as a white solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 77% yield (72.2 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.34–8.31 (m, 1H), 7.61–7.55 (m, 2H), 7.53–7.48 (m, 3H), 7.36–7.34 (m, 2H), 7.29–7.26 (m, 2H), 7.11–7.09 (m, 2H), 4.20 (s, 4H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 160.0, 145.9, 139.6, 138.1, 136.8, 133.4, 132.1, 131.9, 131.0, 130.9, 126.7, 125.2, 124.2, 123.8, 121.7, 121.6, 118.7, 53.9. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C22H16Br2NO is 469.9573; found 469.9566
3,4-Bis(4-(tert-butyl)phenyl)-1-methoxyisoquinoline (3o)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2e, the title compound 3o was isolated as a yellow solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.8) in 83% yield (70.3 mg). 1H NMR (500 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.31 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H), 7.60–7.54 (m, 2H), 7.52–7.49 (m, 1H), 7.39–7.36 (m, 4H), 7.19–7.15 (m, 4H), 4.23 (s, 3H), 1.37 (s, 9H), 1.28 (s, 9H). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.5, 150.0, 149.8, 146.7, 138.8, 138.0, 135.1, 131.4, 130.3, 130.0, 126.1, 125.8, 125.3, 124.8, 124.4, 123.9, 118.4, 53.7, 34.7, 34.6, 31.6, 31.4. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C30H34NO is 424.2635; found 424.2636
1-Methoxy-4-methyl-3-phenylisoquinoline (3p) + 1-Methoxy-3-methyl-4-phenylisoquinoline (3p′)
Following the general procedure GP with compounds 1a and 2f, the title compounds 3p+3p′ (4:1) were isolated as a yellow solid using silica gel column chromatography with ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/100, R f = 0.4) in 79% combined yield (39.4 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.30 (d, J = 8.2 Hz, 1H, major, 80%), 7.96 (d, J = 8.5 Hz, 1H, major, 80%), 7.93–7.91 (m, 1H, minor, 20%), 7.75–7.71 (m, 1H, major), 7.69–7.63 (m, 2H, major + m, 1H, minor), 7.57–7.53 (m, 1H, major), 7.49–7.45 (m, 2H, major + 3H, minor), 7.42–7.37 (m, 1H, major + 4H, minor), 4.13 (s, 3H, major, 80%), 4.05 (s, 3H, minor, 20%), 2.58 (s, 3H, minor, 20%), 2.56 (s, 3H, major, 80%). 13C NMR (126 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.7, 147.9, 141.6, 138.8, 138.7, 130.5, 130.2, 130.0, 129.1, 128.3, 128.0, 127.6, 127.5, 127.3, 126.3, 126.0, 124.5, 123.7, 122.9, 118.8, 117.4, 53.6, 53.5, 15.9, 15.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C17H16NO is 250.1227; found 250.1217
4,5,9,10-Tetraethyl-7-methoxyimidazo[1,2-a]pyrido[3,4-g]quinoline (4)
A mixture of 4-(1H-imidazol-1-yl)benzonitrile 1j (34 mg, 0.2 mmol), alkyne 2a (41 mg, 0.5 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (12 mg, 0.02 mmol), Cu(OAc)2·H2O (160 mg, 0.8 mmol), Pivalic acid (41 mg, 0.4 mmol) was added to an oven-dried 50 mL pressure tube containing a magnetic stirring bar. Dry MeOH (100 equiv) was added to the tube and the mixture was stirred at 130 °C for 24 h under air. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on neutral alumina using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/20, R f = 0.8) as eluent to obtain pure 4 as a brown solid in 72% yield (52 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.85 (s, 1H), 8.20 (s, 1H), 8.14 (s, 1H), 7.63 (s, 1H), 4.18 (s, 3H), 3.18–3.15 (m, 4H), 3.07 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 2.90 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 1.40–1.36 (m, 8H), 1.34–1.32 (m, 4H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 158.9, 151.2, 144.9, 135.8, 134.4, 133.6, 131.9, 129.1, 122.6, 122.0, 121.2, 116.2, 111.8, 107.2, 53.6, 28.1, 21.5, 21.2, 20.8, 15.2, 15.2, 14.5, 14.2. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C23H28N3O is 362.2227; found 362.2230
4,5-Diethylimidazo[1,2-a]quinoline-7-carbonitrile (5)
A mixture of 1j (68 mg, 0.4 mmol), alkyne 2a (33 mg, 0.4 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (12 mg, 0.02 mmol), Cu(OAc)2·H2O (160 mg, 0.8 mmol), and Pivalic acid (82 mg, 0.8 mmol) was added to an oven-dried pressure tube containing a magnetic stirring bar. Dry DCE (2.5 mL) was added to the tube and the mixture was stirred at 130 °C in a preheated oil bath for 24 h under air. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on neutral alumina using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/10, R f = 0.6) as eluent to obtain pure 5 as a brown oil in 61% yield (61 mg). 1H NMR (400 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.29 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 8.02–8.01 (m, 1H), 7.97 (d, J = 8.6 Hz, 1H), 7.80 (dd, J = 8.6, 1.5 Hz, 1H), 7.68 (brs, 1H), 3.16 (q, J = 7.5 Hz, 2H), 3.05 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.37–1.30 (m, 6H). 13C NMR (101 MHz, CDCl3): δ 144.6, 134.1, 133.1, 133.0, 131.6, 130.8, 129.8, 123.9, 118.9, 116.7, 111.5, 108.5, 21.6, 21.0, 15.1, 14.3. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C16H16N3 is 250.1339; found 250.1338
4,5-Diethyl-7-methoxy-9,10-diphenylimidazo[1,2-a]pyrido[3,4-g]quinoline (6)
A mixture of 5 (50 mg, 0.2 mmol), alkyne 2c (39 mg, 0.22 mmol), [Ru(p-cymene)Cl2]2 (3 mg, 0.005 mmol), and Cu(OAc)2·H2O (60 mg, 0.3 mmol) was added to an oven-dried pressure tube containing a magnetic stirring bar. Dry MeOH (100 equiv) was added to the tube and the mixture was stirred at 120 °C in a preheated oil bath for 8 h under air. After completion of the reaction, the reaction mixture was transferred to a round-bottom flask and the solvent was evaporated under reduced pressure. The obtained residue was purified by column chromatography on neutral alumina using ethyl acetate/petroleum ether (v/v = 1/10, R f = 0.6) as eluent to obtain pure 6 as a brown gum in 65% yield (59 mg). 1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 8.94 (s, 1H), 7.94 (s, 1H), 7.72 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.51 (d, J = 1.3 Hz, 1H), 7.48–7.47 (m, 2H), 7.44–7.41 (m, 3H), 7.32–7.31 (m, 2H), 7.22–7.20 (m, 3H), 4.31 (s, 3H), 3.21 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 3.16 (q, J = 7.6 Hz, 2H), 1.43 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H), 1.38 (t, J = 7.6 Hz, 3H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 159.9, 147.3, 144.7, 140.7, 137.8, 137.0, 134.2, 133.7, 131.9, 131.8, 130.5, 129.9, 128.8, 127.7, 127.6, 127.4, 124.1, 123.1, 122.0, 116.1, 112.0, 110.2, 54.1, 21.6, 21.2, 15.2, 14.5. HRMS (ESI) m/z: [M+H]+ calcd for C31H28N3O is 458.2227; found 458.2231
Synthesis of [Ru(p-cymene)(OAc)2]
A mixture of [RuCl2(p-cymene)]2 (184 mg, 0.3 mmol, 1 equiv) and silver acetate (225 mg, 1.35 mmol, 4.5 equiv) in toluene (4.0 mL) was stirred at room temperature for 12 h in a round-bottom flask. The reaction mixture was filtered through celite to remove AgCl and was evaporated to dryness under reduced pressure. The residue was recrystallized from diethyl ether/pet ether (1:1, v/v) and dried in vacuo to give yellow needles of the product (174 mg, 82%)
1H NMR (600 MHz, CDCl3): δ 5.76 (brs, 2H), 5.55 (brs, 2H), 2.87–2.83 (m, 1H), 2.24 (s, 3H), 1.92 (s, 6H), 1.35 (d, J = 6.9 Hz, 6H). 13C NMR (151 MHz, CDCl3): δ 184.6, 98.2, 79.0, 77.9, 31.5, 23.9, 22.6, 18.6