Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2753-9131
Original Article

Implementing a Digital Neurocritical Care Unit for Neonates in Brazil: A 4-Year Experience

Authors

  • Silvia Schoenau de Azevedo

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Danieli Mayumi Kimura Leandro

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
    2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Thais Silveira Santos

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Marcelo Jenné Mimica

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
    3   Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Patrik Gonçalves Rodrigues

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Juliana Querino Teixeira

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Teresa Maria Lopes de Oliveira Uras Belém

    4   Estivadores Hospital of Santos, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Caio Genovez Medina

    5   Social Institute of the Oswaldo Cruz German Hospital, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Ana Claudia Pimenta Barbosa Fernandes

    4   Estivadores Hospital of Santos, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Fabia Becker Pasquini Sugahara

    4   Estivadores Hospital of Santos, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Maurício Magalhães

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
    2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
    3   Santa Casa de São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
  • Gabriel Fernando Todeschi Variane

    1   Protecting Brains & Saving Futures, Clinical Research Department, São Paulo, Brazil
    2   Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Irmandade da Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Abstract

Objective

This study aimed to describe neuromonitoring findings and short-term outcomes after the implementation of a digital health strategy comprising continuous, real-time, tele-based video-aEEG/EEG monitoring in a publicly funded NICU in Brazil.

Study Design

Prospective, observational cohort study conducted between July 2017 and June 2021, analyzing neuromonitoring data of high-risk newborns and correlating it with clinical and imaging outcomes.

Results

A total of 116 newborns, with a median gestational age of 37 weeks (interquartile range [IQR]: 322/7–392/7) and a median birth weight of 2,800 g (IQR: 1,472–3,305), were enrolled with more than 8,000 hours of monitoring. The main indication was suspected seizure (n = 49, 42.2%). A total of 43 (37.1%) neonates presented pathological background activity, and sleep–wake cycle (SWC) was absent in 68 (58.6%). Seizures were identified in 36 (31.0%) neonates, predominantly within the first 12 hours of life (n = 14, 38.9%), electrographic-only (n = 29, 80.6%), and repetitive (n = 24, 66.7%). A total of 47 (40.5%) neonates received antiseizure medications, with phenobarbital being the most frequently used (46; 97.9%). Only one patient (2.1%) was discharged receiving antiseizure medication. Cranial ultrasound (cUS) was performed in 94 (81.0%) infants, with abnormal findings in 34 (36.2%) infants. Pathological background activity, absence of SWC, and seizures were significantly associated with severe abnormalities on cUS, and increased risk of death before discharge.

Conclusion

The implementation of a digital health strategy incorporating real-time and continuous video-aEEG/EEG monitoring demonstrated potential to improve diagnostic accuracy for electrographic seizures, optimize antiseizure medication stewardship, and inform early neuroprotective interventions.

Key Points

  • Brain monitoring improves seizure diagnosis.

  • aEEG/EEG supported antiseizure medication discontinuation.

  • Abnormal aEEG/EEG findings are associated with poor outcomes.

  • Remote aEEG/EEG monitoring is feasible in LMIC.

Contributors' Statement

S.S.A., D.M.K.L., T.S.S., P.G.R., J.Q.T., T.M.L.d.O.U.B., C.G.M., A.C.P.B.F., F.B.P.S., M.M., G.F.T.V., and M.J.M.: concept and design; S.S.A., D.M.K.L., P.G.R., J.Q.T., T.M.L.d.O.U.B., C.G.M., A.C.P.B.F., and F.B.P.S.: data collection and analysis; G.F.T.V., and M.J.M.: study supervision. All the authors drafted and revised the manuscript.




Publication History

Received: 20 August 2025

Accepted: 23 November 2025

Article published online:
04 December 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA