Am J Perinatol
DOI: 10.1055/a-2764-3361
Original Article

The Impact of a Protocol on Equitable Labor and Delivery Substance Use Screening: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors

  • Jennifer J.M. Cate

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Siera Lunn

    2   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Adwoa Baffoe-Bonnie

    2   Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Ronan Sugrue

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Pennilee West

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Tracy Truong

    3   Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Alaattin Erkanli

    3   Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Jennifer Gilner

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Brenna Hughes

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
  • Sarahn Wheeler

    1   Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States

Funding Information J.J.M.C. was supported by the Charles B. Hammond Research Fund, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors.

Abstract

Objective

The Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), and the American Society of Addiction Medicine (ASAM) jointly recommend universal substance use screening in pregnancy with a validated tool. Biologic testing with urine drug screening (UDS) is not recommended unless testing would change medical management. Despite recommendations, racial and socioeconomic differences in substance use screening and biological testing exist. We evaluated the impact of an obstetric substance use screening protocol on validated screening, UDS indication documentation, pre-UDS patient assent, and UDS disparities across race, ethnicity, and payor.

Study Design

This retrospective cohort study used electronic health record data before (July 1, 2020–June 9, 2021) and after (June 10, 2021–May 31, 2022) implementation of an obstetric substance use screening protocol at a tertiary care center. Documented, validated screening, UDS indication, and patient assent were assessed among UDS encounters pre- and postintervention. Association of race, ethnicity, and payor with UDS was assessed using generalized estimating equations models pre- and postintervention. Categorical variables were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests.

Results

UDS occurred less frequently postintervention than preintervention (1.9% [124/6,412 encounters] vs. 7.8% [441/5,658 encounters], p < 0.001). Adjusting for payor, Black individuals had higher odds of UDS (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.11, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.64–2.70) than White individuals preintervention; however, there were no differences (aOR = 1.23, 95% CI: 0.81–1.87) postintervention. Privately insured individuals had lower odds of UDS preintervention (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.18–0.30) and postintervention (OR = 0.08, 95% CI: 0.04–0.15) than government-insured individuals. Among those with UDS, none (0/441) underwent validated screening preintervention versus 36.3% (45/124) postintervention. Documented UDS indication occurred in 27.9% (123/441) preintervention versus 55.7% (69/124) postintervention (p < 0.001). Documented assent occurred in 0.5% (2/441) of encounters preintervention versus 47.6% (59/124) postintervention (p < 0.001).

Conclusion

Implementation of an obstetric substance use screening protocol was associated with decreasing UDS and increasing validated screening, documented UDS indication, and patient assent. Racial disparities in UDS were reduced postintervention; however, suboptimal screening remained, with persistent disparities by payor.

Key Points

  • Substance use screening in pregnancy with a validated tool is performed suboptimally.

  • There are known disparities in biologic testing for substance use by race and socioeconomic status.

  • We evaluated an obstetric substance use screening protocol pre- and postintervention.

  • The protocol was associated with validated tool use, patient assent, and screening documentation.

  • Racial disparities in substance use screening were reduced postintervention.



Publication History

Received: 15 October 2025

Accepted: 04 December 2025

Article published online:
29 December 2025

© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Thieme Medical Publishers, Inc.
333 Seventh Avenue, 18th Floor, New York, NY 10001, USA