Does Information Available at Admission for Delivery Improve Prediction of Vaginal Birth after Cesarean?

ABSTRACT

We sought to construct a predictive model for vaginal birth after cesarean (VBAC) that combines factors that can be ascertained only as the pregnancy progresses with those known at initiation of prenatal care. Using multivariable modeling, we constructed a predictive model for VBAC that included patient factors known at the initial prenatal visit as well as those that only become evident as the pregnancy progresses to the admission for delivery. We analyzed 9616 women. The regression equation for VBAC success included multiple factors that could not be known at the first prenatal visit. The area under the curve for this model was significantly greater (p < 0.001) than that of a model that included only factors available at the first prenatal visit. A prediction model for VBAC success, which incorporates factors that can be ascertained only as the pregnancy progresses, adds to the predictive accuracy of a model that uses only factors available at a first prenatal visit.

KEYWORDS

Trial of labor - vaginal birth after cesarean - prediction

REFERENCES

• 1 Grobman W A, Lai Y, Landon M B et al.. Prediction of uterine rupture associated with attempted vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;  199 1-5
• 2 Macones G A, Cahill A G, Stamilio D M, Odibo A, Peipert J, Stevens E J. Can uterine rupture in patients attempting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery be predicted?.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006;  195 1148-1152
• 3 Grobman W A, Lai Y, Landon M B National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network (MFMU) et al. Development of a nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109 806-812
• 4 Landon M B, Leindecker S, Spong C Y National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  193(3 Pt 2) 1016-1023
• 5 Grobman W A, Gilbert S, Landon M B et al.. Outcomes of induction of labor after one prior cesarean.  Obstet Gynecol. 2007;  109(2 Pt 1) 262-269
• 6 Landon M B, Leindecker S, Spong C Y National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network et al. The MFMU Cesarean Registry: factors affecting the success of trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;  193(3 Pt 2) 1016-1023
• 7 Gong G, Samaniego F J. Pseudo maximum likelihood estimation: theory and applications.  Ann Stat. 1981;  9 861-869
• 8 Hastie T, Tibshirani R, Friedman J. The elements of statistical learning. New York; Springer-Verlag 2001